Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Home About us Editorial Board Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online: 271
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 309-313
Synchrotron radiation-based micro-computed tomographic analysis of dentinal microcracks using rotary and reciprocating file systems: An in vitro study


1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Nalgonda, Telangana, India
2 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
3 RRCAT, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission11-Sep-2020
Date of Decision21-Sep-2020
Date of Acceptance20-Oct-2020
Date of Web Publication04-Dec-2020
 

   Abstract 

Background: Advances in both X-ray sources and X-ray optics have dramatically improved the feasibility of these techniques in various fields.
Aims: We aimed to evaluate the frequency of dentinal microcracks observed after root canal preparation with ProTaper Gold (PTG), Hyflex electrodischarge machining (HEDM), Reciproc (RPC), and WaveOne Gold (WOG) using synchrotron radiation-based micro-computed tomographic (SR-μCT) analysis.
Subjects and Methods: Forty mandibular molars were assigned to 4 experimental groups (n = 10) according to the file system used for the root canal preparation: Group 1: PTG (25/0.08), Group 2: HEDM (25/0.08), Group 3: RPC (25/0.08), and Group 4: WOG (25/0.07). The specimens were scanned on SR-μCT system before and after root canal preparation. The pre- and postoperative cross-sectional images (N = 183,200) of the mesial roots were screened to identify the presence of dentinal microcracks. The number of microcracks was determined as a percentage for each group.
Statistical Analysis: There was no necessity of statistical analysis in the present study. The number of microcracks was determined as a percentage for each group.
Results: Among the four file systems tested, HEDM (0.9%) has shown a fewer number of new dentinal microcracks.
Conclusions: SR-μCT can be used as a reliable diagnostic tool for further implications.

Keywords: Dentinal microcracks; root canal preparation; synchrotron

How to cite this article:
Vemisetty H, Priya N T, Singh B, Yenubary P, Agarwal AK, Surakanti JR. Synchrotron radiation-based micro-computed tomographic analysis of dentinal microcracks using rotary and reciprocating file systems: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2020;23:309-13

How to cite this URL:
Vemisetty H, Priya N T, Singh B, Yenubary P, Agarwal AK, Surakanti JR. Synchrotron radiation-based micro-computed tomographic analysis of dentinal microcracks using rotary and reciprocating file systems: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Sep 17];23:309-13. Available from: https://www.jcd.org.in/text.asp?2020/23/3/309/302303

   Introduction Top


Endodontically treated teeth are more susceptible to vertical root fractures which eventually lead to tooth or root extraction.[1] The biomechanical preparation of root canals causes stress concentration in the root dentin, which creates a gateway to dentinal microcracks, leading to failure of treatment.[2],[3] Complexities in canal preparation may be attributed to variation in design of cutting instruments, taper, and composition from which it is made.[4] With the inception of nickel–titanium (NiTi) rotary instrumentation, root canal treatment has transfigured to a more convenient and time-saving procedure which also minimizes the procedural errors as compared to hand instrumentation.[5]

The nondestructive imaging techniques such as cone-beam computed tomography (CT) and microtomography (micro-CT) provide three-dimensional (3D) images with isotropic voxels which are more appropriate to investigate the structure of dentine and its alterations.[6] In contrast to conventional micro-CT, synchrotron-generated X-rays used in this study are particularly powerful for several reasons. The narrow bandwidth of the X ray energy permits quantitative CT imaging with high accuracy of the measured attenuation coefficients along with element selective imaging.[7] Another advantage is that the scans use a parallel-beam geometry, which allows the reconstruction of different regions of the sample at a higher spatial resolution. Furthermore, the artifacts (beam hardening) are reduced with respect to the use of polychromatic conventional sources with an increased signal-to-noise ratio.[8] With high brilliance, coherence, and energy tunability, synchrotron sources allow faster image acquisition, better sensitivity, and higher resolution.[9]

Controversy still remains on the best motion of action for NiTi rotary file. Till date, no studies have compared the incidence of dentinal microcracks of ProTaper Gold (PTG; Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, OK, USA), Hyflex electrodischarge machining ([HEDM; Coltene/Whaledent AG, Altstatten, Switzerland), WaveOne Gold (WOG; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), and Reciproc (RPC; VDW, Munich, Germany) file systems in root canals using a synchrotron radiation-based micro-CT (SR-μCT).


   Subjects and Methods Top


Sample selection

Forty freshly extracted human mandibular first and second molars from patients of 40 to 60 years which were selected for different clinical reasons were used in the present study. Teeth were extracted by an experienced oral surgeon using an atraumatic technique. In brief, an intrasulcular incision was used to separate the mucoperiosteum from the root and bone. Periotomes were used to sever the periodontal ligament from the root surface. Extraction was completed with luxators and forceps.[10] All roots were initially inspected with digital radiographs to detect and exclude teeth with any visible preexisting craze lines, cracks, and root canal obstructions. Only teeth with fully formed roots, closed apices, and two mesial root canals with independent foramina having moderate curvature (10°–20° curvature angle) analyzed through Schneider’s technique were selected.[11] The specimens were decoronated to remove the distal roots using a low-speed saw (Isomet; Buehler Ltd., Lake Bluff, NY, USA) with water cooling, leaving mesial roots with approximately 12 ± 1 mm in length to prevent the introduction of any confounding variables. All the roots were inspected with a dental operating microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) at ×24 magnification to detect any new cracks formed. Four teeth with such findings were excluded and replaced. Canal patency was established with a size 10 K-file in the presence of Glyde (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). All teeth in which canal patency could not be established were excluded from the study and replaced with similar patent teeth. The specimens selected were then stored in 0.1% thymol solution at 5°C.

Experimental setup

To attain an overall outline of the mesial roots and structural variations in pre- and postprocessing conditions with different file systems, micro-CT experiments have been performed at X-ray Imaging Beamline (BL-04), Indus-2 Synchrotron Source, Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology, Indore, India. Indus-2 is a third-generation synchrotron source operating at 200 mA current and 2.5GeV energy which provide broad radiation extending from infrared to hard X-ray. This beamline extracts a hard X-ray monochromatic beam using a silicon Si (111) double-crystal monochromator to expose the teeth samples. The projection images were acquired at 25 keV X-ray-beam energy with a rotation step of 0.2°. The bright- and dark-field images were also acquired to correct the image noise. A very high-resolution (pixel size: 4.5 mm) photonic science charge-coupled device camera having field of view 18 mm × 12 mm is used to acquire the X-ray projection images. The sample was mounted on two high precision linear stages along with one angular stage on the top to rotate the sample. The detector was mounted on three linear translation stage systems to align and optimize the imaging system. The acquired projection images were preprocessed, normalized, and reconstructed using a filtered back-projection algorithm to get the 3D slice images. Further quantitative analysis of all slice images was done using the ImageJ software.[12]

Root canal preparation

The surface of the roots was coated with a thin film of polyvinyl siloxane impression material to simulate the periodontal ligament and placed corono-apically inside a custom-made jig to further streamline the coregistration process. Apical patency was determined by inserting a size 10 K-file into the root canal until its tip was visible at the apical foramen, and the working length (WL) was set 1.0 mm shorter of this measurement. After glide paths were established with a size 15 K-file (Dentsply Maillefer) up to the WL, the specimens were randomly assigned to 4 experimental groups (n = 10):

  • Group 1 – PTG (25/0.08): Root canals were prepared in a crown-down fashion with the aid of an X-Smart Plus electric motor with torque control (Dentsply Maillefer) at 300 rpm. The PTG shaping SX, S1, and S2 and finishing F1 and F2 files were sequentially used with a continuous in-and-out movement until the WL was reached. Torque and other parameters for each file were set as per the manufacturer’s recommendation
  • Group 2 – HEDM (25/0.08): The canals in this group were shaped using X-Smart Plus electric motor with torque control (Dentsply Maillefer) with HEDM file at 500 rpm and 2.5 Ncm torque in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions up to the WL
  • Group 3 – RPC (25/0.08): The R25 instrument was used with X-Smart Plus electric motor with torque control (Dentsply Maillefer) using in-and-out pecking motion in the “RECIPROC ALL” mode until reaching the WL of the canals. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, gentle apical pressure was applied to the file
  • Group 4 – WOG (25/0.07): The canals in this group were shaped with X-Smart Plus electric motor with torque control (Dentsply Maillefer) using the WOG primary NiTi file in the “WAVEONE ALL” mode until reaching the WL. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, gentle apical pressure was applied to the file. In all the four groups, canal irrigation was consistent with 2 ml 2.5% NaOCl and saline alternatively. After preparation, a postoperative micro-CT scan of each specimen was performed using the aforementioned parameters.


Dentinal microcrack evaluation

Octopus 3D imaging reconstruction software was used for superimposition that coregistered the image stacks of the specimens pre and post the canal preparation. The cross-sectional images of the mesial roots were screened (N = 81,747) to identify the presence of dentinal microcracks. To start the analysis, the postoperative images were scanned and the number of the cross sections in which dentinal microcracks had been noticed was recorded as showed in [Figure 1]. This was proceeded by the analysis of preoperative corresponding images to verify the new dentinal microcracks that were observed in the postoperative equivalent. For the present study, dentinal microcracks included all lines and cracks observed, which were extended or not extended to the external root surface.
Figure 1: Representative cross-sectional images of mesial roots of mandibular molars showing the presence of dentinal microcracks before and after preparation with ProTaper Gold, Hyflex electrodischarge machining, Reciproc, and Wave One Gold file systems

Click here to view



   Results Top


On examining the 81,747 cross-sectional images, 11,555 (14%) images showed new dentinal microcracks. The presence of dentinal microcracks was observed in 1.96% (n = 399), 0.90% (n = 200), 1.32% (256), and 1.04% (210) in the PTG, HEDM, RPC, and WOG groups, respectively, as shown in [Table 1]. All dentinal defects identified in the postoperative scans were already present in the corresponding preoperative images, and new microcracks were observed after root canal instrumentation with the tested systems.
Table 1: Tabular representation showing number of microcracks determined as a percentage for each group

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


In the present study, HEDM (Group 2) have shown to induce a fewer number of dentinal microcracks compared to other Groups 1, 3, and 4. All dentinal microcracks identified in the postoperative scans were already present in the corresponding preoperative images, and few new microcracks were observed after root canal instrumentation. A high frequency of defects caused by the mechanical preparation of root canals was analyzed through various previous studies.[13],[14] Yoldas et al.[15] claimed that the tip design of rotary instruments, cross-sectional geometry, constant or variable pitch and taper, and flute form could be related to crack formation. Under the present experimental framework, the increased flexibility of HEDM and WOG may have contributed to less dentinal microcracks compared with the other file systems (RPC and PTG). HEDM is a new generation single-file system with continuous rotation motion. Throughout their entire working part, they have three different horizontal cross sections: a quadratic in the apical region, trapezoidal in the middle, and almost triangular in the coronal region. These files are made of a controlled memory alloy using electrodischarge machining technology, which significantly improved its flexibility.[16],[17] According to the manufacturer, WOG used in reciprocating motion is repeatedly heat treated and cooled, having parallelogram cross section, providing increased flexibility and cyclic fatigue resistance.[18],[19]

Based on the studies reviewed, the reciprocating instruments tend to create less dentinal microcracks than the continuous rotary instruments[20],[21] and vice versa.[5],[22] Few studies reported no significant difference between the motions.[23],[24] The differences between these previous studies could be related to different methodologies such as different sectioning techniques, imaging techniques, selection of the specimens, and different types and sizes of instruments.

Studies on dentinal microcrack formation present some limitations. This research aimed to reduce the influence of many confounding factors. The patients’ age may play an important role in the presence of dentinal microcracks; hence, teeth from a limited age group (40–60 years) were selected in accordance with a previous study.[13] Many previous studies[5] used single-rooted teeth, however, in the present study, mesial canals of mandibular molars were selected. The constricted anatomic configuration of these canals results in more stress on the dentinal surface during canal preparation and eventually increases the potential for crack formation. According to a previous study,[14] root canal irrigation of mature single-rooted premolars with 5.25% NaOCl affected its dentinal properties sufficiently, altering their strain characteristics to induce more brittleness to dentin. Hence, in the present study, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution was used for irrigation. The presence of experimental dentinal microcracks can also be attributed to extraction process and/or the postextraction storage conditions. To minimize this, atraumatic extraction by the trained surgeon was performed, as mentioned.[10] It was reported that crack propagation was continuous in root slices even after 1 month of storage with no further stress over dentin,[25] and thus, the baseline status of the sample is crucial for reliability. Hence, the storage time was minimized. Investigations using human cadaver models[10] with a noninvasive micro-CT imaging method will provide a more profound information regarding the formation of dentinal microcracks. However, in the present study, emphasis was made in using SR-μCT as a research tool for further dental research. In the present study, hundreds of high-resolution slices per tooth for microcracks were analyzed and calculated than the conventional sectioning techniques that allow the evaluation of only a few slices per tooth with the actual possibility of missing various defects along the root, which confirms the reliability of this novel technology for detecting dentin defects.

To date, no SRCT study observed samples pre- and postinstrumentation of PTG, HEDM, RPC, and WOG. We believe that using such method will boost the efficiency on the investigation of tooth-related defects over a large number of specimens. In fact, one of the limitations of this in vitro study is the long duration which is required for series of scans per sample (pre- and postinstrumentation).[9]


   Conclusions Top


Within the limitation of this in vitro study, the few microcracks have been observed which is associated with mechanical instrumentation irrespective of the kinematics used in the study. Further ex vivo investigations should focus on the prevalence of microcracks associated with endodontic failures. Therefore, SR-μCT analysis will help the researchers to investigate the tooth-related defects more effectively and quantitatively.

Acknowledgment

This study was conducted at X-ray Imaging Beamline (BL-04), Indus-2 Synchrotron Source, Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology (RRCAT), Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Tsesis I, Rosen E, Tamse A, Taschieri S, Kfir A. Diagnosis of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth based on clinical and radiographic indices: A systematic review. J Endod 2010;36:1455-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Blum JY, Cohen A, Machtou P, Micallef JP. Analysis of forces developed during mechanical preparation of extracted teeth using profile NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 1999;32:24-31.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Wilcox LR, Roskelley C, Sutton T. The relationship of root canal enlargement to finger spreader induced vertical root fracture. J Endod 1997;23:533-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Beullens M, Wevers M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Smooth flexible versus active tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2002;35:820-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Priya NT, Chandrasekhar V, Anita S, Tummala M, Raj TB, Badami V, et al. “Dentinal microcracks after root canal preparation” a comparative evaluation with hand, rotary and reciprocating instrumentation. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:ZC70-2.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Zaslansky P, Fratzl P, Rack A, Wu MK, Wesselink PR, Shemesh H. Identification of root filling interfaces by microscopy and tomography methods. Int Endod J 2011;44:395-401.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Liu H, Zhang C, Fan X, Duan Y, Xiao T, Du G, et al. Robust phase retrieval based X ray tomography for morphological assessment of early hepatic echinococcosis infection in rats. PLoS One 2017;12:e0183396.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Pop I, Manoharan A, Zanini F, Tromba G, Patel S, Foschi F. Synchrotron light based µCT to analyse the presence of dentinal microcracks post rotary and reciprocating NiTi instrumentation. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:11-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Agrawal AK, Singh B, Kashyap YS, Shukla M, Sarkar PS, Sinha A. Design, development and first experiments on the X ray imaging beamline at Indus 2 synchrotron source RRCAT, India. J Synchrotron Radiat 2015;22:1531-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
PradeepKumar AR, Shemesh H, Chang JW, Bhowmik A, Sibi S, GopikrishnaV, etal. Preexisting dentinal microcracks in nonendodontically treated teeth: An ex vivo micro computed tomographic analysis. J Endod 2017;43:896-900.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Balani P, Niazi F, Rashid H. A brief review of the methods used to determine the curvature of root canals. J Res Dent 2015;3:57-63.  Back to cited text no. 11
  [Full text]  
12.
Li ML, Liao WL, Cai HX. A micro computed tomographic evaluation of dentinal microcrack alterations during root canal preparation using single file Ni Ti systems. Exp Ther Med 2018;15:494-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Bier CA, Shemesh H, Tanomaru Filho M, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. The ability of different nickel titanium rotary instruments to induce dentinal damage during canal preparation. J Endod 2009;35:236-8.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
De Deus G, Belladonna FG, Silva EJ, Marins JR, Souza EM, Perez R, et al. On the casuality between dentinal defects and root canal preparation: A micro CT assessment. Braz Dent J 2016;27:664-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Yoldas O, Yilmaz S, Atakan G, Kuden C, Kasan Z. Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file. J Endod 2012;38(2):232-5.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Das S, Pradhan PK, Lata S, Sinha SP. Comparative evaluation of dentinal crack formation after root canal preparation using ProTaper Next, OneShape, and Hyflex EDM. J Conserv Dent 2018;21:153-6  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Gundogar M, Ozyurek T. Cyclic fatigue resistance of oneShape, Hy Flex EDM, wave one gold, and reciproc blue nickel titanium instruments. J Endod 2017;43:1192-6.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Cassimiro M, Romeiro K, Gominho L, de Almeida A, Silva L, Albuquerque D. Effects of Reciproc, ProTaper Next and WaveOne Gold on Root Canal Walls: A Stereomicroscope Analysis. Iran Endod J. 2018;13(2):228-233.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Pedulla E, Genovesi F, Rapisarda S, La Rosa GR, Grande NM, Plotino G, et al. Effects of 6 single file systems on dentinal crack formation. J Endod 2017;43:456-61.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Monga P, Bajaj N, Mahajan P, Garg S. Comparison of incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation with continuous rotation and reciprocating instrumentation. Singapore Dent J 2015;36:29-33.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Kansal R, Rajput A, Talwar S, Roongta R, Verma M. Assessment of dentinal damage during canal preparation using reciprocating and rotary files. J Endod 2014;40:1443-6.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Saberi EA, Farhad Mollashahi N, Ahmadi M. Comparative evaluation of dentinal microcracks in root canals prepared by Neoniti, Reciproc, and pro taper instruments. Zahedan J Res Med Sci 2020;22:e90772.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Burklein S, Tsotsis P, Schafer E. Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation: Reciprocating versus rotary instrumentation. J Endod 2013;39:501-4.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Karatas E, Gunduz HA, Kirici DO, Arslan H, Topcu MC, Yeter KY. Dentinal crack formation during root canal preparations by the twisted file adaptive, ProTaper Next, ProTaper Universal, and WaveOne instruments. J Endod 2015;41:261-4.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
De Deus G, Cavalcante DM, Belladonna FG, Carvalhal J, Souza EM, Lopes RT, et al. Root dentinal microcracks: A post extraction experimental phenomenon? Int Endod J 2019;52:857-65.  Back to cited text no. 25
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. N Tulasi Priya
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Govt. Dental College, Hyderabad, Telangana Dist
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_465_20

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Subjects and Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed460    
    Printed8    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded48    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal