Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Home About us Editorial Board Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online: 1478
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 240-243
Need for an alternative method to cement fiber-reinforced posts - A pushout bond strength analysis


1 Private Practitioner, Sapru's Denal Clinic, New Delhi, India
2 Professor and Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Studies, Manav Rachna Dental College, MRIIRS, Faridabad, Haryana, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission18-Jul-2020
Date of Decision20-Jul-2020
Date of Acceptance25-Aug-2020
Date of Web Publication04-Dec-2020
 

   Abstract 

Background: The use of dissimilar materials used as posts, luting agents, and the core often makes the restorative procedure quite complicated, as each material demands its own technical process. Furthermore, it may not necessarily result in better collective physical properties.
Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze the pushout bond strength of a zirconia-based core buildup material in cementing two fiber posts.
Methods: Eighty single-rooted mandibular premolars were decoronated, endodontically treated, post space prepared, and randomly assigned to one of the following four groups: carbon fiber post luted with PermaCem 2.0, carbon fiber post luted with LuxaCore Z Dual, glass fiber post luted with PermaCem 2.0, and glass fiber post luted with LuxaCore Z Dual. Pushout bond strength was evaluated in a universal testing machine for each of the 2 ± 0.5 mm sections obtained from the samples (total 160 sections)
Statistical Analysis: One-way ANOVA and post hoc tests were used for statistical analysis.
Results: The glass fiber posts cemented with LuxaCore Z showed significantly higher pushout bond strength (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: LuxaCore Z Dual-core build material was more effective as a luting agent for glass fiber post cementation.

Keywords: Carbon fiber posts; dual-cure resin cement; etch and rinse; glass fiber posts; self-adhesive resin cement

How to cite this article:
Dax S, Abraham D. Need for an alternative method to cement fiber-reinforced posts - A pushout bond strength analysis. J Conserv Dent 2020;23:240-3

How to cite this URL:
Dax S, Abraham D. Need for an alternative method to cement fiber-reinforced posts - A pushout bond strength analysis. J Conserv Dent [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 16];23:240-3. Available from: https://www.jcd.org.in/text.asp?2020/23/3/240/302296

   Introduction Top


Tooth-colored posts such as zirconium-coated fiber posts, fiber-reinforced light posts, and various glass fiber posts are available today to aid in the retention of the final restoration as well as the distribution of torquing forces within the radicular dentin along the length of the root.[1],[2] Fiber posts have similar modulus of elasticity to dentin thus absorbing the stresses and preventing root fracture.[3],[4]

Retention of fiber posts relies on the strength of the bond between dentin-cement interface on one hand and post-cement interface on the other. In addition to this, minimizing the number of steps in post cementation followed by core buildup may enhance the longevity of the restoration. Hence, this study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of a zirconia-based core buildup material (LuxaCore Z dual) on the pushout bond strength of glass fiber and carbon posts and further check the viability of using a core buildup material to cement posts.

The mode of analyzing the bond strength still remains the pushout bond strength test, and hence, the same was used in this study.[5]


   Methods Top


Eighty, single-rooted mandibular human premolars, which were extracted for orthodontic reasons were used in this study. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee (MRDC/IEC/2013/10). These teeth had completely formed roots and closed apices, with no cracks or structural anomalies. The presence of a single-root canal was confirmed by taking radiographs in two angulations (mesiodistal and labiolingual). The teeth were then stored in deionized water after autoclaving until further use. According to the ISO standards, the teeth were used within 1–6 months after extraction. Teeth were decoronated 1.5–2.0 mm coronal to the cementoenamel junction with a diamond disc to obtain standardized length of 15 + 1 mm.

Canal shaping was done using ProTaper Gold rotary files (Dentsply International Inc., TN, USA) up to size F3 as the master apical file with intermittent copious irrigation using 3% sodium hypochlorite (Prime Dental Products, Maharashtra, India), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and normal saline. The warm vertical technique for obturation was carried out using F3 gutta percha master cone with AH plus sealer (Dentsply Maillefer, Switzerland). The access cavity was sealed and samples were stored in distilled water at 100% humidity and 37°C for 24 h.

Gutta percha was retrieved using gates-glidden no.2 (MANI, Inc., Tochigi, Japan) and further refined using the corresponding drill for the post size 2 (1.3 mm) leaving 5 mm of gutta percha at the apex. The specimens were randomly distributed into four study groups (n = 20) using a computer program (www.random.org).

In the two groups, where LuxaCore Z (DMG, Hamburg, Germany), a dual-cure adhesive cement was used as the luting agent, the walls of the post space were etched for 15 s with 37% phosphoric acid. Bonding agent was applied as per manufacturer instructions, and roots were polymerized using a light-curing unit for 20 s with the tip directed toward the post space opening. Carbon fiber-reinforced posts were luted in one of the subgroups, while glass fiber-reinforced posts were cemented in the other subgroup using gentle finger pressure, and the excess was immediately removed. The samples were subjected to an additional light curing for 20 s, with the tip of the light cure unit in close proximity to the coronal end of the posts.

In the two groups, where PermaCem 2.0 (DMG, Hamburg, Germany) dual-cure self-adhesive resin was used as a luting agent, the post space was dried and both the subgroups of carbon fiber post and glass fiber posts were cemented and further light cured for 20 s.

The samples were then mounted in customized steel rings using self-cure acrylic and immersed in distilled water for 1 week at 37°C. Two sections measuring 2 ± 0.5 mm were prepared from each sample using low-speed precision IsoMet cutter (Buehler Ltd, IL, USA) at a speed of 200 rpm with continuous water cooling resulting in a total of 160 sections. The sections were then subjected to the universal testing machine to analyze the pushout bond strength.

A customized jig was assembled, and the pin head was placed directly in the center of the sample. Pushout tests were performed with a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min with a pin diameter of 1 mm being attached to a universal testing machine. Care was taken to center the pushout pin on the post surface without causing stress on the post space walls. The load was then applied to the apical side of the root slice to avoid resistance to movement of the post due to post space taper [Figure 1].
Figure 1: posts cemented with LuxaCore Z Dual (a) and PermaCem 2.0 (b). Samples were mounted in self-cure acrylic (c) and a digital Vernier caliper was used to verify the thickness of the sample after sectioning (d). The universal testing machine (e) on which the samples were mounted for pushout bond strength testing (f)

Click here to view


Statistics

The data were subjected to statistical analysis for the calculation of mean and standard deviation and percentages. To find the significance of study parameters, one-way ANOVA test was used to compare the mean values between the groups, followed by post hoc tests for group-wise comparison. P ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant at 95% confidence interval.


   Results Top


Summarized data are presented in [Table 1] and [Figure 2]. The glass fiber post cemented with LuxaCore Z dual group showed the maximum pushout bond strength of 19.50 ± 6.68 MPa, which was statistically significant compared to the other groups. The lowest mean pushout bond strength of 8.38 ± 3.41 was exhibited by the carbon fiber posts cemented with PermaCem 2.0.
Table 1: Mean pushout bond strength values (MPa) for different groups

Click here to view
Figure 2: Box plot depicting the mean pushout bond strength of all the four groups

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The present study clearly showed that glass fiber posts cemented with LuxaCore Dual Z using the etch and rinse technique yielded higher bond strength values. Parallel-sided serrated posts which were used in this study resist tensile, shear, and torquing forces better.[6],[7] The findings concur with the results in a recent study by Mayya et al.[8] The type of glass fiber selected in this study is known to chemically bond with the adhesive resin matrix.[9],[10] The results of this study are in concurrence with those of Allabban et al.,[11] Vadavadagi et al.,[2] Abduljawad et al.,[3] Turker et al.,[4] and Alnaqbi et al.[12]

A statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in bond strength values between carbon fiber and glass fiber-reinforced posts probably suggests that the amount of light transmitted by the glass fiber-reinforced post permitted more efficient curing of the luting cement throughout the tooth. Another contributing factor could be the type of core material used. In this study, LuxaCore Z, a dual-cure core buildup material used to cement the glass fiber posts and carbon fiber posts showed higher bond strength values thus reinforcing the fact that low viscosity core materials which minimize the occurrence of voids make it easier to lute the posts.[8],[13]

The etch and rinse technique followed during the cementation with the LuxaCore Z groups yielded higher bond strength and is in agreement with the findings of Malyk et al.,[14] Goracci et al.,[15] and more recently by Shafiei et al.[16] Furthermore, the bond strength between a different core buildup material and luting agent affects the retention significantly.[17] Hence, this study was carried out to check the viability of using a core buildup material to cement the posts and thus create a true monobloc effect.

The sections were taken in the coronal third as there is no significant difference in pushout bond strength results in different sections of the root as aptly shown by Bazzo et al.[18] The pushout bond strength testing continues to be the preferred mode for evaluation as is clearly evident in the systemic review of literature by El Mourad.[5]

Comparison to other available core buildup materials could be considered. Methodologically, static loading was used, and hence, dynamic loading along with thermocycling should be considered. Furthermore, in vivo studies with substantial follow-up could be done to validate the findings of this study.


   Conclusion Top


Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that glass fiber posts cemented using the etch and rinse technique yielded the best results.

LuxaCore Z Dual, primarily a core buildup material, can be used for post cementation. It represents a promising alternative to the resin cements provided by the post system manufactures because of simplifying the clinical procedure.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Sulaiman E, Alarami N, Wong YI, Lee WH, Al-Haddad A. The effect of fiber post location on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Dent Med Probl 2018;55:275-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Vadavadagi SV, Dhananjaya KM, Yadahalli RP, Lahari M, Shetty SR, Bhavana BL. Comparison of different post systems for fracture resistance: An in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18:205-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Abduljawad M, Samran A, Kadour J, Al-Afandi M, Ghazal M, Kern M. Effect of fiber posts on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth with cervical cavities: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:80-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Turker SB, Alkumru HN, Akalin B. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated canines restored with different sizes of fiber post and all-ceramic crowns. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:158-66.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
El Mourad AM. Assessment of bonding effectiveness of adhesive materials to tooth structure using bond strength test methods: A review of literature. Open Dent J 2018;12:664-78.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Stockton LW. Factors affecting retention of post systems: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:380-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: A review. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:355-63.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Mayya A, Naik R, Mayya SS, Paul MP. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars with a longer single post and Shorter double posts of different sizes: An in vitro study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2020;10:183-4.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandin S, Geppi S. Influence of micro brush on the efficacy of bonding into root canals. Am J Dent 2002;15:227-231.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Vichi A, Grandini S, Ferrari M. Comparison between two clinical procedures for bonding fiber posts into a root canal: A microscopic investigation. J Endod 2002;28:355-60.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Allabban MN, Youssef SA, Nejri AA, Qudaih MA. Evaluation of bond strength of aesthetic type of posts at different regions of root canal after application of adhesive resin cement. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2019;7:2167-72.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Alnaqbi IO, Elbishari H, Elsubeihi ES. Effect of fiber post-resin matrix composition on bond strength of post-cement interface. Int J Dent 2018;2018:4751627.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Panitiwat P, Salimee P. Effect of different composite core materials on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with FRC posts. J Appl Oral Sci 2017;25:203-10.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Malyk Y, Kaaden C, Hickel R, Ilie N. Analysis of resin tags formation in root canal dentine: A cross sectional study. Int Endod J 2010;43:47-56.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Goracci C, Sadek FT, Fabianelli A, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent 2005;30:627-35.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Shafiei F, Yousefipour B, MohammadiBassir M. Effect of carbodiimide on bonding durability of adhesivecemented fiber posts in root canals. Oper Dent 2016;41:43240.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kadam A, Pujar M, Patil C. Evaluation of pushout bond strength of two fiberreinforced composite posts systems using two luting cements in vitro. J Conserv Dent 2013;16:4448.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
18.
Bazzo JF, Pedriali MB, Guiraldo RD, Berger SB, Moura SK, de de Carvalho RV. Push-out bond strength of different translucent fiber posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. J Conserv Dent 2016;19:583-6.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Dax Abraham
Manav Rachna Dental College Faridabd, Haryana-121003
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_345_20

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed276    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded40    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal