Journal of Conservative Dentistry

CASE REPORT
Year
: 2015  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 168--171

Single C-shaped canal in mandibular first molar: A case report


Srinidhi Surya Raghavendra, Bandu D Napte, Niranjan N Desai, Ajit N Hindlekar 
 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Srinidhi Surya Raghavendra
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune - 411 041, Maharashtra
India

Abstract

The variability of root canal system morphology presents a continuous challenge to endodontic diagnosis and therapeutics. There have been reports of teeth with multiple roots and canals as also those with lesser number of root and root canals. Variations of root canal systems need not always be in the form of extra canals. Clinicians should be aware that there is a possibility of existence of fewer numbers of roots and root canals than normal, which presents varied canal anatomy and poses a challenge to the clinician«SQ»s expertise. This case report deals with the management of an unusual case of C-shaped canal in mandibular molar with two buccally fused roots. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was employed to confirm the extension of the unusual anatomy. The Self Adjusting File (SAF) system was used to ensure complete cleaning of the canal system. One-year follow-up of the case showed good healing. The clinician should expect to encounter unusual features when performing endodontic treatment. Use of diagnostic aids like CBCT, improved magnification with dental operating microscope, and the use of novel file systems like SAF ensure success.



How to cite this article:
Raghavendra SS, Napte BD, Desai NN, Hindlekar AN. Single C-shaped canal in mandibular first molar: A case report .J Conserv Dent 2015;18:168-171


How to cite this URL:
Raghavendra SS, Napte BD, Desai NN, Hindlekar AN. Single C-shaped canal in mandibular first molar: A case report . J Conserv Dent [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Sep 22 ];18:168-171
Available from: http://www.jcd.org.in/text.asp?2015/18/2/168/153060


Full Text

 INTRODUCTION



A thorough knowledge of root canal anatomy is necessary to achieve appropriate cleaning and shaping of the root canal system and ensure success of endodontic treatment. [1] Very often, the mandibular first molars require endodontic treatment as they are the first permanent posterior teeth to erupt and are commonly affected by caries. [2] The mandibular first molar presents with two well-defined roots: A mesial root with two canals and a distal root with one or two canals. Variations in the form, configuration, and number of root canals in mandibular molars have been discussed extensively in endodontic literature. [3],[4] These include five, [5] six, [6] and seven root canals; [7] middle mesial canal; [8] middle distal canal; [9] four canals in mesial root; [10] four canals in distal root; [11] radix entomolaris [12] and paramolaris; and C-shaped canal. [13] These reports include cases with more number of canals than normal.

However, the clinician should be aware of the possibility of the existence of lesser number of roots or canals. Gopikrishna et al., published a case of single root with a single canal in a maxillary first molar. [14] Recently, Krithikadatta et al., have reported a case of a mandibular first molar with two roots and two root canals. [15]

The purpose of this paper is to report the management of the uncommon anatomy of a mandibular first molar with two fused roots and single C-shaped canal. This case report details the use of the Self Adjusting File (SAF) system which is particularly useful in cleaning of such C-shaped canals.

 CASE REPORT



A 39-year-old female patient reported to the Department of Endodontics with the chief complaint of spontaneous pain in the lower left posterior region. History revealed intermittent pain with the left mandibular first molar for the past 2 months, which had increased in intensity for the past 3 days. Subjective symptoms included sensitivity to thermal stimuli and an increase in intensity of pain. The patient's medical history was noncontributory. Previous dental history included extraction of the mandibular left second molar 3-4 years ago due to caries. Clinical examination of the left mandibular first molar revealed the presence of a large distoocclusal carious lesion which was sensitive to percussion. Periodontal probing around the tooth showed normal alveolar bone morphology, normal sulcular depth, absence of pockets, and mobility within physiological limits. Sensibility testing with dry ice (RC Ice, Prime Dental Products Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India) caused an intense lingering pain; whereas, electric pulp testing (Parkell Electronics Division, Farmingdale, NY) showed exaggerated response. Preoperative radiographs revealed a distoocclusal radiolucency approaching the pulp space with a widened periodontal ligament space adjacent to the root apex [Figure 1]a]. Multiple angulated radiographs confirmed the presence of fused roots. From the sensibility tests and clinical and radiographic examination, a diagnosis of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with symptomatic apical periodontitis was made and routine nonsurgical endodontic treatment was planned. Treatment plan was explained to the patient and consent obtained.{Figure 1}

Local anesthesia was induced using 1.8 ml 2% lidocaine with 1: 200,000 epinephrine (Xylocaine, AstraZeneca Pharma India Ltd, Bangalore, India). Following caries excavation, the distal surface of the tooth was restored with Intermediate Restorative Material (IRM; L. D. Caulk Co., Milford, DE, USA). Rubber dam was placed and a conventional endodontic access opening was established with an Endo Access Bur (Dentsply Tulsa, Tulsa, OK). On access opening, a single large C-shaped canal was located in the center of the pulp chamber [Figure 1]b]. After clinical examination with dental operating microscope (Moller Wedel, Germany), it was found that the tooth had two root canals which were fused buccally and had single C-shaped canal. It was decided to confirm the extension of the C-shaped canal with a CBCT scan (Carestream CS9300, 85kV, 8mA, 19.96s). This confirmed the fusion of the two buccal roots, and a single C-shaped canal clearly visible in the coronal section which extended all the way till the apex [Figure 1]c].

Working length was determined using an apex locator (Root ZX II, Morita, Tokyo, Japan) and confirmed with radiographs. Cleaning and shaping was done using circumferential filing technique with ISO 2% taper files up to size 25 (Mani Inc, Tochigi-Ken, Japan) and further cleaning and shaping done with SAF (ReDent Nova, Israel) of 2mm diameter and 21mm length with pecking motion having 0.4mm amplitude and 5,000 oscillations per minute [Figure 1]d]. Irrigation was performed using normal saline (Nirma Pvt limited, Gujarat, India), 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution (Vishal Dental Products, Mumbai, India), and 17% ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA; Prime Dental Products Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India) as final flush. Final rinsing of the canal was performed using normal saline. The canal was dried with absorbent points (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and obturation was performed using sectional method for the apical third [Figure 2]a], followed by backfill with thermoplasticized gutta-percha using Obtura II (Obtura Spartan, Wendt Street Algonquin, IL, US) and AH Plus resin sealer (Maillefer Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) [Figure 2]b]. After completion of root canal treatment, the access cavity was restored using resin composite (3M ESPE Dental Products, St Paul, MN), followed by full coverage crown. One-year follow-up showed good healing [Figure 2]c].{Figure 2}

 DISCUSSION



The mandibular first molars erupt at an age of 6-7 years and apical closure is usually completed by 8-9 years. The completion of canal differentiation commences about 3-6 years after root completion. [15] Any disturbances in this differentiation can result in variations in canal anatomy. Sabala et al., [16] has stated that the rarer the aberration is, the greater the probability of it being bilateral. In this case, the contralateral mandibular posterior was extracted, and hence, the morphology could not be determined. Fava et al., [17] had identified the existence of such anatomical variations in second molars in all the maxillary and mandibular second molars. Majority of the permanent mandibular first molars typically present with two well-defined roots, a mesial root with two canals and a distal root with a wide oval canal or two round canals. [3] Apart from these presentations, wide variations of root and canal configuration of the mandibular first molars have been reported in the literature. [5],[13]

Systematic review of literature on canal morphology of the mandibular first molar by De Pablo et al., [18] and Ballulaya et al., [19] has not found cases of single root and single canal. This morphological variation has been documented in an in vitro study done by Reuben et al. [20] Out of 125 samples of mandibular first molars from an Indian population, only one sample had a single root and single canal (0.85%). Further, C-shaped canal was found in only one sample. Demirbuga et al., [21] evaluated the root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second molars in Turkish population and reported an incidence of 0.12% for single root and canal and 0.85% for C-shaped canals in mandibular first molars. Sooriaprakas et al., have reported the incidence of a single root and single canal in mandibular first molar. [22] [Table 1] illustrates variations in mandibular first molars according to different authors.{Table 1}

Radiographic examination is an essential component in endodontic treatment. The use of multiple preoperative radiographs or an additional radiographic view from a 20-degree mesial or distal projection increases the chances of detecting unusual root canal morphology. [23]

Kottoor et al., [24],[25] and La et al., [26] have suggested the use of CBCT for the purpose of determining the root canal morphology in cases with aberrations. In this particular case CBCT was advised to determine the root canal morphology and also extension of C-shaped canal towards the apex. CBCT interpretation clearly showed that this tooth had a single C-shaped canal which was beginning from the pulp chamber to apex without any furcation.

Melton et al., [27] in 1991 had proposed a classification of C-shaped canals based on their cross-sectional shape. Fan et al., [28],[29] in 2004 modified Melton's classification into the following categories:

Category I (C1): The shape was an interrupted "C" with no separation or division.Category II (C2): The canal shape resembled a semicolon resulting from a discontinuation of the 'C' outline.Category III (C3): Two or three separate canals (highest incidence).Category IV (C4): Only one round or oval canal in that cross-section.Category V (C5): No canal lumen could be observed (which is usually seen near the apex only).

In this case, the root canal would fall into category C1. The anatomic feature of such a canal is the presence of a fin or web which connects the individual canals. There is a large amount of debris seen in instrumented C-shaped canals which could lead to endodontic failure. [27] Use of hand or rotary endodontic files alone would not result in proper cleaning of such canal systems. The SAF system has a hollow core with interlocking lattice design. Since the file accommodates itself according to the shape of the canal, it is ideally suited for large, oval, or C-shaped canals. The constant irrigant flow is an added advantage. In this case, the enlargement was done initially using ISO taper files and finished with the SAF. Thermoplasticized obturation technique was chosen here due to the oval C-shaped canal outline. In combination with vertical compaction, this technique enables complete filling of the canal anatomy.

 CONCLUSION



This case report presents the uncommon anatomy of mandibular first molar with two fused roots and single C-shaped canal. Careful inspection of the tooth under dental operating microscope and the correct choice of cleaning and shaping technique suitable for this uncommon root canal anatomy helps achieve success in such aberrant cases.

References

1Cleghorn BM, Goodacre CJ, Christie WH. Morphology of teeth and their root canal systems. In: Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner JC. Ingle's Endodontics, 6 th ed., B C Decker Inc., Hamilton, 2008. p. 151-220.
2Vertucci FJ, Haddix JE. Tooth morphology and access cavity preparation. In: Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. Pathways of the pulp. 10 th ed., Mosby: St Louis, Missouri, 2010. p. 136-222.
3Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path 1984;58:589-99.
4Skidmore AE, Bjorndal AM. Root canal morphology of the human mandibular first molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:778-84.
5Beatty RG, Interian CM. A mandibular first molar with five canals: Report of a case. J Am Dent Assoc 1985;111:769-71.
6Martínez A-Berná, Badanelli P. Mandibular first molars with six root canals. J Endod 1985;11:348-52.
7Reeh ES. Seven canals in a lower first molar. J Endod 1998;24:497-9.
8Baugh D, Wallace J. Middle mesial canal of the mandibular first molar: A case report and literature review. J Endod 2004;30:185-6.
9Kottoor J, Sudha R, Velmurugan N. Middle distal canal of the mandibular first molar: A case report and literature review. Int Endod J 2010;43:714-22.
10Subbiya A, Kumar KS, Vivekanandhan P, Prakash V. Management of mandibular first molar with four canals in mesial root. J Conserv Dent 2013;16:471-3.
11Ghoddusi J, Naghavi N, Zarei M, Rohani E. Mandibular first molar with four distal canals. J Endod 2007;33:1481-3.
12Attam K, Nawa RR, Utneja S, Talwar S. Radix entomolaris in mandibular first molars in Indian population: A review and case reports. Case Rep Dent 2012.
13Bolger WL, Schindler WG. A mandibular first molar with a C-shaped root configuration. J Endod 1988;14:515-9.
14Gopikrishna V, Bhargavi N, Kandaswamy D. Endodontic management of a maxillary first molar with a single root and a single canal diagnosed with the aid of spiral CT: Aa case report. J Endod 2006;32:687-91.
15Krithikadatta J, Kottoor J, Karumaran CS, Rajan G. Mandibular first molar having unusual mesial root canal morphology with contradictory cone-beam computed tomography findings: A case report. J Endod 2010;36:1712-6.
16Sabala CL, Benenati FW, Neas BR. Bilateral root or root canal aberrations in a dental school patient population. J Endod 1994;20:38-42.
17Fava LR, Weinfeld I, Fabri FP, Pais CR. Four second molars with single roots and single canals in the same patient. Int Endod J 2000;33:138-42.
18De Pablo OV, Estevez R, Péix Sánchez M, Heilborn C, Cohenca N. Root anatomy and canal configuration of the permanent mandibular first molar: A systematic review. J Endod 2010;36:1919-31.
19Ballulaya SV, Vemuri S, Kumar PR. Variable permanent mandibular first molar: Review of literature. J Cons Dent 2013;16:99-110.
20Reuben J, Velmurugan J, Kandaswamy D. The evaluation of root canal morphology of the mandibular first molar in an Indian population using spiral computed tomography scan: An in vitro study. J Endod 2008;34:212-5.
21Demirbuga S, Sekerci AE, Dincar AN, Cayabatmaz M, Zorba YO. Use of cone beam computed tomography to evaluate root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second molars in Turkish individuals. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013;18:e737-44.
22Sooriaprakas C, Ballal S, Velmurugan N. Mandibular first molar with a single root and single canal. Case Rep Dent 2014.
23Fava LG, Dummer PM. Periapical radiographic techniques during endodontic diagnosis and treatment. Int Endod J 1997;30:250-61.
24Kottoor J, Velmurugan N, Sudha R, Hemamalathi S. Maxillary first molar with seven root canals diagnosed with cone-beam computed tomography scanning: A case report. J Endod 2010;36:915-21.
25Kottoor J, Velmurugan S, Surendran S. Endodontic management of a maxillary first molar with eight root canal systems evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography scanning: A case report. J Endod 2011;37:715-9.
26La SH, Jung H, Kim EC, Min KS. Identification of independent middle mesial canal in mandibular first molar using cone-beam computed tomography imaging. J Endod 2010;36:542-5.
27Melton DC, Krell KV, Fuller MW. Anatomical and histological features of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars. J Endod 1991;17:384-8.
28Fan B, Cheung GS, Fan M, Gutmann JL, Bian Z. C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars: Part I-Anatomical features. J Endod 2004;30:899-903.
29Fan B, Cheung GS, Fan M, Gutmann JL, Fan W. C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars: Part II-Radiographic features. J Endod 2004;30:904-8.