Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Home About us Editorial Board Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online: 359
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 391-395
Comparative evaluation of microleakage after root-end resection by erbium, chromium: Yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er, Cr:YSGG) laser and carbide bur with or without placement of mineral trioxide aggregate: An in vitro study


1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, Baddi, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India
2 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr. R. Ahmed Dental College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
3 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, North Bengal Medical College and Hospital, Darjeeling, West Bengal, India
4 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Rayat and Bahra Dental College and Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission18-Feb-2019
Date of Decision16-May-2019
Date of Acceptance24-Jun-2019
Date of Web Publication07-Nov-2019
 

   Abstract 

Background: Root-end resection followed by retrofilling is one of the prime requisites to avoid apical microleakage.
Aim: It comparatively evaluated the microleakage after root-end resection by erbium, chromium:yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet laser and carbide bur with or without placement of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA).
Materials and Methods: In this study, 60 maxillary central incisors were decoronated and biomechanically prepared. Out of 60 samples, 48 were included in the experimental group while the rest 12 were in the control group. The samples in the experimental group were obturated, whereas the samples in the control group were not obturated. The experimental group samples were divided into two: one group resected with the laser and the other half resected with carbide bur. These groups were further subdivided into two – one group retrofilled with MTA and the other half without MTA. The control group had both laser- and carbide bur-resected samples with positive and negative controls. All the samples were dyed, decalcified, and cleared. Digital photograph of each sample was taken, and the area of dye penetration was measured with the help of ImageJ software.
Statistical Analysis: Analysis of variance and Tukey's test were done.
Results: The highest microleakage was seen in carbide without MTA and the least was seen with laser with MTA.
Conclusion: Laser-resected MTA-retrofilled samples showed minimum leakage.

Keywords: Carbide bur; dye; erbium, chromium:yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet; microleakage; mineral trioxide aggregate; retrofilling; root resection

How to cite this article:
Negi S, Adhikari HD, Mazumder D, Lakiang R D, Bhardwaj S. Comparative evaluation of microleakage after root-end resection by erbium, chromium: Yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er, Cr:YSGG) laser and carbide bur with or without placement of mineral trioxide aggregate: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2019;22:391-5

How to cite this URL:
Negi S, Adhikari HD, Mazumder D, Lakiang R D, Bhardwaj S. Comparative evaluation of microleakage after root-end resection by erbium, chromium: Yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er, Cr:YSGG) laser and carbide bur with or without placement of mineral trioxide aggregate: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 20];22:391-5. Available from: http://www.jcd.org.in/text.asp?2019/22/4/391/270499

   Introduction Top


Periradicular surgery involves surgical removal of pathological tissue along with root resection, followed by preparation of root-end cavity and filling the cavity to seal the root canal apically.[1],[2] Majority of root resections are done with burs at slow or fast rotations, but other equipment can also be used such as ultrasonics and lasers.[3]

In recent years, erbium, chromium: yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet (Er, Cr:YSGG) laser has been found to be useful in endodontic surgery for root-end resection and root-end cavity preparation with an additional advantage of hemostasis and sterilized environment. This laser cuts hard tissue with highly energized water particles and soft tissue directly with laser energy.[4]

Root-end resection is followed by root-end preparation with filling of root-end cavity with an adequate retrograde filling material to prevent the invasion of bacteria and its products into the root canal. Due to its promising results, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) has received crescent interest as a retrograde material.[5]

Hence, considering the advantages of laser and MTA and limited study related to it in the field of surgery, it was decided to comparatively evaluate in vitro, the microleakage after root-end resection by Er, Cr:YSGG, and carbide bur with or without placement of MTA with the help of dye penetration method.


   Materials and Methods Top


This study protocol has been approved by local institutional ethical committee. This study consisted of sixty freshly extracted human maxillary central incisors. Teeth were decoronated, and root canal preparation was done with ProTaper rotary file system till the size #F5 (Dentsply) using X-Smart endodontic motor (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). During each filing, Glyde (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) was used as a lubricating agent. After every filing, each canal was irrigated with 2 ml of 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) (PDP, India), and final irrigation was carried out with 2 ml of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (PDP, India), followed by 2 ml of 5% NaOCl. Out of 60 samples, 48 were included in the experimental group and 12 were included in the control group. The samples in the experimental group were obturated with thermoplasticized gutta-percha (GP) using E and Q Plus (META BIOMED CO. LTD, Mochung-Dong, Heungduk-Gu, Cheongju City, Chungbuk, Korea) which consists of a heat-carrying unit (pen) and thermoplasticized gutta-percha dispensing gun and AH Plus sealer (Dentsply) and condensed vertically. The access cavities were filled with glass ionomer cement (GC Fuji II). While the samples in the control group were not obturated, the samples in the experimental group were divided into two: one group (n = 24) was resected with Er, Cr:YSGG (Waterlase MD, Biolase Technology, Inc., San Clemente, CA, USA) laser and a G6 laser tip, with the following parameters: 4.5w, 20pps, 20% water, and 50% air. Laser beam was collimated through a flat-ended cylindrical tip (sapphire tip diameter: 600 μm). This tip was placed perpendicular to the long axis of the root, 3 mm from the apex, to obtain root-end resection without a bevel. After resection, the gutta-percha was burnished and the other (n = 24) was resected with surgical carbide bur #701 (SS White, Lakewood, New Jersey, USA). From the apex 3 mm was marked and by placing the bur at 90° to the long axis, resection was done under water flow. After resection, the gutta-percha was burnished. The laser- and bur-resected groups were further subdivided into two – the first group (n = 12) was retrofilled with MTA (ProRoot MTA Dentsply/Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK, USA). This subgroup which received MTA, retrocavity of 3mm was made with S” series diamond-coated retro micro-tip (S 12-90 ND) (Satelec) set at medium power, moving the microtip in feather like back and forth motion under constant water spray. MTA was mixed according to manufacturer's instructions, and the root-end cavities were filled with MTA. In the second group, no root-end cavity was prepared (n = 12), which means that there were four experimental subgroups:

  1. Root resection with laser and MTA retrograde restoration (laser with MTA)
  2. Root resection with laser without MTA retrograde restoration (laser without MTA)
  3. Root resection with carbide bur and MTA retrograde restoration (carbide with MTA)
  4. Root resection with carbide bur without MTA retrograde restoration (carbide without MTA).


In the control group, half of the samples were laser resected (n = 6) and another half were carbide bur (n = 6) resected. Both the laser- and bur-resected groups were retroprepared but not retrofilled, were divided into positive (n = 3) and negative (n = 3) control subgroups. The samples from all groups were left in 100% humidity for 72 h. All the samples of the experimental and positive control groups were coated with nail polish keeping the root-end resected surfaces exposed while the entire surface of the negative control group was coated with nail polish and was immersed overnight (18 h) in 1% methylene blue dye (pH: 7) at room temperature. Before clearing procedures, the roots were carefully cleaned, and the nail polish was removed with the aid of periodontal curettes and nail polish remover. They were decalcified at room temperature in the following way: the samples were dipped in 7% formic acid for 3 days, rinsed under running tap water and then dipped into 3% hydrochloric acid for 3 days, and again rinsed and dipped into 8% sodium citrate for another 3 days; thereafter, the samples were rinsed under running water for 2 h. They were thereafter placed in 99% acetic acid for 12 h. The samples were then taken out and were rinsed with distilled water. After this, the samples were immersed in gradually increasing concentration of ethyl alcohol for dehydration in 70%, 80%, 95%, and 100% for 30 min each and thereafter dried. The samples were then rendered transparent by dipping in methyl salicylate (NICE) for 2 days. Digital photographs were obtained from the mesial and distal aspects of each sample [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b. Thereafter, areas of dye penetration were measured in photograph taken from mesial and distal sides for each sample by two evaluators, who were unaware about sample grouping with the help of ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). The measurements from two evaluators were averaged and statistically analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey's test, and t-test was used to test the means. P < 0.05 was taken to be statistically significant.
Figure 1: (a and b) Digital photographs of cleared samples showing leakage penetration with the help of ImageJ software (a) Mesial (b) Distal

Click here to view



   Results Top


When the mean of dye penetration of two evaluators was compared, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) [Figure 2]. The positive control subgroup showed total dye penetration, whereas the negative control subgroup showed no dye penetration.
Figure 2: Diagrammatic representation of comparison of mean of the area (mm2) measured by the two evaluators. t-test showed that there was no significant difference in measurements between two evaluators (P > 0.05)

Click here to view


The highest microleakage was seen in carbide without MTA (0.88 ± 0.39), followed by laser without MTA (0.75 ± 0.32) and then carbide with MTA (0.42 ± 0.23), and the least was seen with laser with MTA (0.20 ± 0.16) [Table 1] and [Figure 3].
Table 1: Mean±standard deviation, median, and range of microleakage in the experimental subgroups

Click here to view
Figure 3: Diagrammatic representation of comparison of mean area of microleakage in the experimental subgroups

Click here to view


ANOVA depicted that this difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01) [Table 2].
Table 2: Analysis of variance table for experimental subgroups

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Under the condition of this study, the highest microleakage was seen in carbide without MTA and the least was seen with laser with MTA. These findings were supported by the study of Camargo Villela Berbert et al.[6] where leakage was less in laser resection because of its vibration-free procedure which ultimately preserved the apical seal of GP and dentinal wall. However, Sullivan et al.[7] found a higher mean dye leakage in the Er, Cr:YSGG group as compared to the carbide-resected group. This may be attributable to fault in laser resection and not achieving a smooth surface. Furthermore, cut ends were not seen under scanning electron microscope (SEM). Ayranci et al.[8] in their study also reported that the erbium: yttrium–aluminum–garnet (Er:YAG) laser produced a rougher resected root surface than the carbide burs; however, the diamond-coated tip provoked many dentinal crack formations compared to the Er:YAG laser and tungsten carbide bur.

Laser resection is better than that of carbide resection, and it is possibly attributed to the fact that laser produces smoother surface than bur resection. This was supported by the study of Kinoshita et al.[9] who proved in their SEM study that Er, Cr:YSGG laser-treated dentin surface had no smear layer or debris and no thermal destruction and there was a minimum gap between dentin and GP while the bur-resected surfaces were rough with cracks and there was a significant difference between dentin and GP interface. A similar study was performed by Babar and Adhikari [10] who confirmed that Er, Cr:YSGG-lased root surface provided better surface morphology and more conducive surface for the regeneration of periodontium as compared to bur root resection.

Gouw-Soares et al.[11] also conducted a study with human teeth where apicoectomies were performed with Er:YAG laser along with other devices. The use of lasers resulted in smoother surfaces, and Paghdiwala [12] also found that thermal ablation with Er:YAG laser causes the breakdown of mineral components and binding of amorphous particles, without crystallization, thus resulting in clean and even surface.

The subgroup which received MTA as root-end filling material demonstrated less amount of microleakage, which is in agreement to in vitro studies of Fischer et al.,[13] Saini et al.,[14] and Rosales-Leal et al.[15] who indicated MTA to be the most effective and gold standard root-end filling material. Even Biodentine which is considered to be a replacement for MTA has poorer marginal adaptation when compared to MTA.[16]

In the present study, several factors may have influenced the difference in mean dye leakage between retrofilled MTA groups and the groups without it. The ultrasonic instrumentation in the MTA group included preparation of isthmuses and removal of these areas that might retain bacteria and their by-products.

In the GP group, the root tip with the apical delta was resected; however, no cleaning of isthmus areas was performed. Furthermore, in the MTA group, the prepared cavity was thoroughly packed with MTA in an attempt to obtain a good seal. However, it is questionable whether the smoothing of GP with the burnisher improved the apical seal. Furthermore, the GP material was often fragile and tended to break into pieces when trying to improve the apical seal.

The selection of tooth sample may affect the extent of microleakage. Kontakiotis et al.[17] in their in vitro study reported that maxillary incisors showed less microleakage as compared to mandibular incisors and premolars. Therefore, in the present study, maxillary incisors were used.

Methylene blue dye was used in this study because it easily allows quantitative measurement of the amount of dye penetration. Methylene blue and butyric acid which is a cytotoxic bacterial metabolite with low molecular weight (88) have been shown to have similar leakage configuration.[18] Thus, methylene blue can serve as a guideline of leakage.

Methylene blue (acidic) may get reacted with dentin and be converted into leucomethylene, a resulting substance that modify the tonality of dye making it troublesome to be visualized. Variation in pH from 1 to 5 may lead to mineral loss in the apical area, when compared to a neutral pH. To avoid such problem in the present study, methylene blue with pH 7 was used.[19]

The Er, Cr:YSGG laser set at 5.0 W and 20 Hz has fine-cutting capacity without inducing carbonization of the root-end surface.[20] Camargo Villela Berbert et al.[6] experienced carbonization at this setting, so they reduced it to 3.5 W. However, Sullivan et al.[7] used 4.5 W as power setting and got an acceptable result. Therefore, in this study, the power setting of 4.5 W was used to prevent overheating and other unwanted effects on dental tissue, and also, air percentage was chosen as 50% as the previous study by Shinkai et al.[21] concluded that lower percentage of air has a better dentin-cutting efficacy than higher percentage of air, when the percentage of air was between 50% and 70%.

Root-end resection was performed at 90° and at 3 mm from apical end because such angle and distance resulted in less microleakage than when apical resection was beveled.[22],[23]

Clearing technique was chosen because it provides a three-dimensional view of root canal filling which in turn assures the possibility to locate atypical anatomical configurations as well as technical standard of root canal filling and sealer. In addition, clearing technique has an advantage of not hampering root morphology.[24]

Dye penetration was not uniform around the margins of the root-end filling material. Therefore, in the present study, instead of linear measurements, the total area of dye penetration from mesial as well as distal aspects of the root was considered.

Another aspect cannot be overlooked that according to Wu et al.,[25] MTA provokes a 73% reduction in the optical density of methylene blue, which can give imprecise results in microleakage studies. The reduction of the staining capacity of methylene blue in contact with MTA may have occurred in this study also, resulting in variation in the observed dye penetration.


   Conclusion Top


Within the limitations and parameters of the present study, it can be concluded that Er, Cr:YSGG laser resection is better than bur resection, and apical microleakage may be better prevented when MTA is used as retrofilling material in laser resected roots. However, still, there is a need for further in vitro and clinical studies with increased number of parameters and sample size to arrive at a conclusion.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Gondim E, Zaia AA, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. Investigation of the marginal adaptation of root-end filling materials in root-end cavities prepared with ultrasonic tips. Int Endod J 2003;36:491-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Froughreyhani M, Milani AS, Rahimi S, Shakouie S, Fateh S. Comparison of apical sealing ability of resected mineral trioxide aggregate, gutta-percha and a resin-based rootcanal filling material (resilon). Afr J Biotechnol 2011;10:10516-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Lustosa-Pereira AC, Pozza DH, Cunha A, Dedavid BA, Duarte-de Moraes JF, Gerhardt-de Oliveira M. Analysis of the morphology and composition of tooth apices apicectomized using three different ablation techniques. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16:e225-30.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Wallace JA. Effect of waterlase laser retrograde root-end cavity preparation on the integrity of root apices of extracted teeth as demonstrated by light microscopy. Aust Endod J 2006;32:35-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Costa AT, Post LK, Xavier CB, Weber JB, Gerhardt-Oliveira M. Marginal adaptation and microleakage of five root-end filling materials: An in vitro study. Minerva Stomatol 2008;57:295-300.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Camargo Villela Berbert FL, de Faria-Júnior NB, Tanomaru-Filho M, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Bonetti-Filho I, Leonardo Rde T, et al. An in vitro evaluation of apicoectomies and retropreparations using different methods. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:e57-63.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Sullivan J, Pileggi R, Varella C. Evaluation of root-end resections performed by er, cr: YSGG laser with and without placement of a root-end filling material. Int J Dent 2009;2009:798786.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Ayranci F, Ayranci LB, Arslan H, Omezli MM, Topcu MC. Assessment of root surfaces of apicected teeth: A scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Niger J Clin Pract 2015;18:198-202.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
9.
Kinoshita JI, Watanabe H, Ali MN, Matsuoka E, Suzuki N, Matsumoto K. Laser application in dental apicectomy. J Oral Laser Appl 2003;3:219-27.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Babar PD, Adhikari HD. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of morphological changes in dental hard tissue after root resection in apicoectomy by Erbium, Chromium: YSGG laser and #702TCBur: Part II. J Dent Lasers 2016;10:67-76.  Back to cited text no. 10
  [Full text]  
11.
Gouw-Soares S, Stabholz A, Lage-Marques JL, Zezell DM, Groth EB, Eduardo CP, et al. Comparative study of dentine permeability after apicectomy and surface treatment with 9.6 microm TEA CO2 and er: YAG laser irradiation. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2004;22:129-39.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Paghdiwala AF. Root resection of endodontically treated teeth by erbium: YAG laser radiation. J Endod 1993;19:91-4.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Fischer EJ, Arens DE, Miller CH. Bacterial leakage of mineral trioxide aggregate as compared with zinc-free amalgam, intermediate restorative material, and super-EBA as a root-end filling material. J Endod 1998;24:176-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Saini D, Nadig G, Saini RA. Comparative analysis of microleakage of three root end filling materials – An in vitro study. Arch Oral Sci 2008;3:43-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Rosales-Leal JI, Olmedo-Gaya V, Vallecillo-Capilla M, Luna-del Castillo JD. Influence of cavity preparation technique (rotary vs. ultrasonic) on microleakage and marginal fit of six end-root filling materials. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16:e185-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Soundappan S, Sundaramurthy JL, Raghu S, Natanasabapathy V. Biodentine versus mineral trioxide aggregate versus intermediate restorative material for retrograde root end filling: An in vitro study. J Dent (Tehran) 2014;11:143-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kontakiotis EG, Lagoudakos TA, Georgopoulou MK. The influence of root-end resection and root-end cavity preparation on microleakage of root filled teeth in vitro. Int Endod J 2004;37:403-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Kersten HW, Moorer WR. Particles and molecules in endodontic leakage. Int Endod J 1989;22:118-24.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Starkey DL, Anderson RW, Pashley DH. An evaluation of the effect of methylene blue dye pH on apical leakage. J Endod 1993;19:435-9.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Kimura Y, Yu DG, Kinoshita J, Hossain M, Yokoyama K, Murakami Y, et al. Effects of erbium, chromium: YSGG laser irradiation on root surface: Morphological and atomic analytical studies. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2001;19:69-72.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Shinkai K, Takada M, Kawashima S, Suzuki M, Suzuki S. Effects of the percentage of air/water in spray on the efficiency of tooth ablation with erbium, chromium: Yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er, Cr:YSGG) laser irradiation. Lasers Med Sci 2019;34:99-105.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Gagliani M, Taschieri S, Molinari R. Ultrasonic root-end preparation: Influence of cutting angle on the apical seal. J Endod 1998;24:726-30.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Peters CI, Peters OA, Barbakow F. An in vitro study comparing root-end cavities prepared by diamond-coated and stainless steel ultrasonic retrotips. Int Endod J 2001;34:142-8.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Oliver CM, Abbott PV. Correlation between clinical success and apical dye penetration. Int Endod J 2001;34:637-44.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Wu MK, Kontakiotis EG, Wesselink PR. Decoloration of 1% methylene blue solution in contact with dental filling materials. J Dent 1998;26:585-9.  Back to cited text no. 25
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Shabnam Negi
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, Baddi, Solan, Himachal Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_48_19

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed34    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded15    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal