| Abstract|| |
Aim: To compare the vitality of Enterococcus faecalis within dentinal tubules after subjected to five root canal disinfection methods.
Materials and Methods: Dentin blocks (n = 60) were colonized with E. faecalis. After 4 weeks of incubation, the dentin blocks were divided into one control and five test groups (n = 10 each). The root canals of test groups were subjected to one of the disinfection methods, namely, normal saline (NS), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX), neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd: YAG) laser, and diode laser. The effect of disinfection methods was assessed by LIVE/DEAD BacLight stain under the confocal laser scanning microscopy to determine the “zone of dead bacteria” (ZDB). Mean values were calculated for ZDB and the difference between groups was established.
Results: Penetration of E. faecalis was seen to a depth of >1000 μm. Viable bacteria were detected with NS irrigation. NaOCl and CHX showed partial ZDB. When the root canals were disinfected with Nd: YAG and diode lasers, no viable bacteria were found.
Conclusion: E. faecalis has the ability to colonize inside dentinal tubules to a depth of >1000 μm. In contrast to conventional irrigants, both Nd: YAG and diode lasers were effective in eliminating the vitality of E. faecalis. NS, NaOCl, and CHX showed viable bacteria remaining in dentinal tubules.
Keywords: Chlorhexidine digluconate; confocal laser scanning microscopy; Enterococcus faecalis; neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser and diode laser; normal saline; sodium hypochlorite
|How to cite this article:|
Vatkar NA, Hegde V, Sathe S. Vitality of Enterococcus faecalis inside dentinal tubules after five root canal disinfection methods. J Conserv Dent 2016;19:445-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Vatkar NA, Hegde V, Sathe S. Vitality of Enterococcus faecalis inside dentinal tubules after five root canal disinfection methods. J Conserv Dent [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Apr 8];19:445-9. Available from: http://www.jcd.org.in/text.asp?2016/19/5/445/190019
| Introduction|| |
The mechanical preparation and chemical disinfection of the root canal of the diseased tooth remain the most important procedures in endodontics. Unfortunately, it is difficult to eliminate all microorganisms and organic debris from the root canal system regardless of the irrigant used and instrumentation , because of the existence of accessory canals, anastomoses, and fins. The reasons for flare-ups are numerous, but surely, one of the critical factors is viable bacteria still remaining within the root canal system. Mechanical instrumentation reduces bacteria from human root canals by approximately 50%. However, auxiliary substances may be necessary to aid the removal of the microbiota in areas where instruments cannot reach. The aim of the study was to compare the vitality of Enterococcus faecalis within dentinal tubules after subjected to five root canal disinfection methods by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM).
| Materials and Methods|| |
Preparation of specimens
The method used in this study was a modification of one previously described by Haapasalo and Orstavik and Gomes et al., Sixty freshly, extracted, single-rooted, single canal mandibular premolars free of any pathology were chosen for the study. These teeth were cleaned of hard tissues debris using ultrasonic scaler under water irrigation, and soft tissue attached to the root was cleaned by immersion in 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) for 24 h. The teeth were then washed in running water and stored in normal saline (NS) until further use. A dentin block of 10 mm was prepared by decoronation and apical resection of 5 mm. The root canal was negotiated with a 10# K-file (Mani Inc., Nakaakutsu, Japan), and shaping was carried out using Gates Glidden drills (Mani Inc., Nakaakutsu, Japan) in sequence from number 1 to 3. Following this, the dentin blocks were ultrasonically activated with aqueous ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid for 4 min. The dentin blocks were washed with sterile water.
Cultivation of bacteria
E. faecalis, ATCC 29212 bacteria, was grown in a Petri dish on a brain–heart infusion (BHI) agar for 24 h. For the colonization of the tooth specimens, BHI liquid media were prepared and the bacteria were then inoculated in these media. The turbidity of the prepared media was adjusted to McFarland's 0.5 using a filter colorimeter. Five milliliters test tubes were chosen for the colonization of tooth specimens.
Inoculation of bacteria
The tooth specimens and the test tubes were autoclaved at 121°C for 15 min at 15 psi pressure. The sterility of the tooth and the test tubes was confirmed by inoculation in agar media, followed by incubation for 24 h to confirm negative culture.
These tooth specimens were then individually transferred to each test tube. Three milliliters BHI liquid medium was added to each of the test tubes. The teeth were incubated at 37°C for 4 weeks in an incubator. The BHI medium was changed twice a week.
Preparation of samples for experimental groups
After 28 days, the teeth were removed from the BHI media and were washed with 1010× phosphate buffered saline (PBS) on the external root surface and inside the root canal. Following this, the tooth specimens were divided into six groups as follows:
- Group I served as a control group, in which only the depth of penetration of the E. faecalis inside the dentinal tubules was evaluated. It was not subjected to any of the disinfection methods
- Group II, 0.9% NS (Baxter, Haryana, India) irrigation
- Group III, 5.25% NaOCl (Hyposept, UPS Hygienes Pvt. Ltd., India) irrigation
- Group IV, 2% chlorhexidine digluconate solution (CHX, Asep-RC, Stedman Pharmaceuticals, India) irrigationThe irrigation for the above groups was done for 1 min with the help of 23-gauge hypodermic needle and syringe (Dispovan, Hindustan Syringes and Medical Devices Ltd, India)
- Group V, neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser (Fotona Fidelis III, Slovenia, Europe) with fiber size of 200 µm was used with NS at setting of 1.5 W, 15 Hz, at very short pulse for 5 s in a continuous mode
- Group VI, diode laser (Sunny) with fiber size of 200 µm was used with NS at setting of 2.5 W for 10 s in a continuous mode.
For both the lasers, the fiber tip was inserted into the root canal at a distance of 1 mm from the apical foramen and moved in three consecutive cycles from apical to coronal at a constant speed of approximately 1.5 mm/s.
The tooth specimens were then washed with PBS to remove any of residual irrigating solutions. Two longitudinal grooves were prepared on the buccal and lingual surface with a diamond disc. Using a chisel and mallet, the tooth specimens were split longitudinally into two halves.
Staining of samples for confocal laser scanning microscopy imaging
After the tooth specimens had been split, the halves were again washed with 100 µl PBS using a micropipette to remove any debris.
For the examination of tooth specimens under the CLSM, a microscope slide was customized. The tooth specimens were then stabilized using elastomeric impression material (Express XT VPS, 3M ESPE, Germany).
After the stabilization of dentin blocks, 100 µl of prepared fluorescent stain (LIVE/DEAD BacLight stain, Invitrogen Detection Technologies, California, USA) according to the manufacturer's instruction was applied and the blocks were incubated with the stain at room temperature for 15 min in a dark environment so that the bacteria take up the stain. After 15 min, the sample was washed with PBS to remove any residual fluorescent stain.
Following this, an antifade mountant (Dakocytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) was applied over the sample. A coverslip was placed and the samples were then subjected to CLSM imaging.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy imaging
The dentin segments were examined under CLSM (LSM 510, Carl Zeiss). The respective absorption and emission wavelengths were 480/500 nm for SYTO 9 and 490/635 nm for propidium iodide. The mounted specimens were observed using a 10× oil lens and a 63× oil lens with an additional zoom of 3×.
| Results|| |
Group I showed bacteria present in dentinal tubules to a depth in a range of 965.45–1175.78 µm [Figure 1]a. For the experimental groups, the zone of dead bacteria (ZDB) was measured for each sample. It is observed from [Figure 1]b,[Figure 1]c,[Figure 1]d,[Figure 1]e,[Figure 1]f and [Table 1]; Group II did not show any dead bacteria for all the samples. Group III had a partial ZDB that measured in a range of 88.45–110.43 µm. Group IV also had a partial ZDB that measured in a range of 109.89–194.14 µm. Group V did not show any viable bacterium in dentinal tubules. In fact, the ZDB was equal to the entire thickness of dentin that measured in a range of 897.89–1145.10 µm. Similarly, Group VI had ZDB which measured in a range of 760.93–1110.12 µm. The results were subjected to statistical analysis using the one-way ANOVA test using Bonferroni corrections with value of P < 0.05 considered as statistically significant. Viable bacteria inside dentinal tubules are significantly higher with NS when compared to all other groups. The ZDB is not significant when NaOCl is compared to CHX. There are viable bacteria present with NaOCl and CHX when compared to lasers. There are no viable bacteria present with Nd:YAG and diode lasers. The ZDB is not significant when Nd:YAG is compared to diode laser [Figure 2].
|Figure 1: Representative confocal images (a) Enterococcus faecalis colonized inside dentinal tubules. (b) No zone of dead bacteria seen with normal saline. (c and d) Partial zone of dead bacteria observed with sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine digluconate respectively. (e and f) Total zone of dead bacteria observed with neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet and diode laser|
Click here to view
|Table 1: Measurement of zone of dead bacteria for the respective disinfection methods|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Average values of zone of dead bacteria for the disinfection groups|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
E. faecalis was chosen because it has been shown to be associated with failed endodontic cases , and has the ability to invade whole length of dentinal tubules to 1100 µm or close to the cementum.,,,,,,, It is also important to validate the bactericidal action of different disinfection methods using a resistant microorganism such as E. faecalis.,,,,,,
CLSM can be used as an alternative to other method of evaluation, for evaluating the penetration depth inside dentinal tubules. The fluorescent stain used in the present study utilizes a mixture of SYTO 9 and propidium iodide. An appropriate mixture of the SYTO 9 and propidium iodide stains bacteria with intact cell membranes (live bacteria) as fluorescent green whereas bacteria with damaged membranes (dead bacteria) as fluorescent red. Bacteria are capable of invading the periluminal dentin to a depth of 1100 µm. The present study has also proved the same with bacteria invading the dentinal tubules nearing to a depth of 1200 µm.
Total elimination of bacteria from dentinal tubules cannot be achieved by irrigants alone. It has also been demonstrated that the penetration of irrigants inside dentinal tubules is not more than 160 µm.,,, NS did not show any dead bacterium. Previous studies have also shown that NaOCl and CHX were more effective than NS in killing bacteria.,,
NaOCl and CHX showed limited ZDB. The reason for the limited ZDB by NaOCl is its inactivation caused by dentin. The limited ZDB by CHX is because of its inability to dissolve necrotic tissue remnants and it is less effectiveness on Gram-negative than on Gram-positive bacteria.,,
The Nd: YAG as well as diode laser showed no viable bacteria, and its effectiveness reaches to a depth of more than 1000 µm inside dentinal tubules. These findings are accordance with previous studies.,,,,,,,, A possible explanation for the greater antibacterial action of lasers is that the light emitted by the laser creates a “light fog” in the dentin and does not have the characteristics of a concentrated beam anymore. The enamel prisms and dentin tubules act as optical fibers that propagate this laser light to the dentinal periphery of the root.,,
| Conclusion|| |
Conventional root canal irrigants have a limited action inside dentinal tubules beyond which viable bacteria are present. This can be a reason for failure postendodontic treatment. In such cases, lasers prove to be a valuable adjunct in elimination of bacteria  and can help reduce the incidence of postendodontic treatment failures.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Grossman L. Endodontic Practice. 9th
ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1978.
Baumgartner JC, Brown CM, Mader CL, Peters DD, Shulman JD. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root canal debridement using saline, sodium hypochlorite, and citric acid. J Endod 1984;10:525-31.
Siqueira JF Jr., de Uzeda M. Intracanal medicaments: Evaluation of the antibacterial effects of chlorhexidine, metronidazole, and calcium hydroxide associated with three vehicles. J Endod 1997;23:167-9.
Bloomfield SF, Miles GA. The antibacterial properties of sodium dichloroisocyanurate and sodium hypochlorite formulations. J Appl Bacteriol 1979;46:65-73.
Lee LW, Lan WH, Wang GY. A evaluation of chlorhexidine as an endosonic irrigan. J Formos Med Assoc 1990;89:491-7.
Haapasalo M, Orstavik D.In vitro
infection and disinfection of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res 1987;66:1375-9.
Gomes BP, Souza SF, Ferraz CC, Teixeira FB, Zaia AA, Valdrighi L, et al.
Effectiveness of 2% chlorhexidine gel and calcium hydroxide against Enterococcus faecalis
in bovine root dentine in vitro
. Int Endod J 2003;36:267-75.
Möller AJ. Microbiological examination of root canals and periapical tissues of human teeth. Methodological studies. Odontol Tidskr 1966;74:1-380.
Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjögren U. Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:86-93.
Dametto FR, Ferraz CC, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, de Souza-Filho FJ.In vitro
assessment of the immediate and prolonged antimicrobial action of chlorhexidine gel as an endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis
. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:768-72.
Horiba N, Maekawa Y, Matsumoto T, Nakamura H. A study of the distribution of endotoxin in the dentinal wall of infected root canals. J Endod 1990;16:331-4.
Kouchi Y, Ninomiya J, Yasuda H, Fukui K, Moriyama T, Okamoto H. Location of Streptococcus mutans
in the dentinal tubules of open infected root canals. J Dent Res 1980;59:2038-46.
Orstavik D, Haapasalo M. Disinfection by endodontic irrigants and dressings of experimentally infected dentinal tubules. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990;6:142-9.
Peters LB, Wesselink PR, Moorer WR. Penetration of bacteria in bovine root dentine in vitro
. Int Endod J 2000;33:28-36.
Peters LB, Wesselink PR, Buijs JF, van Winkelhoff AJ. Viable bacteria in root dentinal tubules of teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 2001;27:76-81.
Weiger R, de Lucena J, Decker HE, Löst C. Vitality status of microorganisms in infected human root dentine. Int Endod J 2002;35:166-71.
Komorowski R, Grad H, Wu XY, Friedman S. Antimicrobial substantivity of chlorhexidine-treated bovine root dentin. J Endod 2000;26:315-7.
Ramsköld LO, Fong CD, Strömberg T. Thermal effects and antibacterial properties of energy levels required to sterilize stained root canals with an Nd:YAG laser. J Endod 1997;23:96-100.
Schoop U, Kluger W, Moritz A, Nedjelik N, Georgopoulos A, Sperr W. Bactericidal effect of different laser systems in the deep layers of dentin. Lasers Surg Med 2004;35:111-6.
Tanriverdi F, Esener T, Erganis O, Belli S. Anin vitro
test model for investigation of disinfection of dentinal tubules infected with Enterococcus faecalis
. Braz Dent J 1997;8:67-72.
Zapata RO, Bramante CM, de Moraes IG, Bernardineli N, Gasparoto TH, Graeff MS, et al.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy is appropriate to detect viability of Enterococcus faecalis
in infected dentin. J Endod 2008;34:1198-201.
Wong DT, Cheung GS. Extension of bactericidal effect of sodium hypochlorite into dentinal tubules. J Endod 2014;40:825-9.
Berutti E, Marini R, Angeretti A. Penetration ability of different irrigants into dentinal tubules. J Endod 1997;23:725-7.
Safavi KE, Spangberg LS, Langeland K. Root canal dentinal tubule disinfection. J Endod 1990;16:207-10.
Vahdaty A, Pitt Ford TR, Wilson RF. Efficacy of chlorhexidine in disinfecting dentinal tubules in vitro
. Endod Dent Traumatol 1993;9:243-8.
Heling I, Chandler NP. Antimicrobial effect of irrigant combinations within dentinal tubules. Int Endod J 1998;31:8-14.
Byström A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res 1981;89:321-8.
Delany GM, Patterson SS, Miller CH, Newton CW. The effect of chlorhexidine gluconate irrigation on the root canal flora of freshly extracted necrotic teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982;53:518-23.
Haapasalo HK, Sirén EK, Waltimo TM, Ørstavik D, Haapasalo MP. Inactivation of local root canal medicaments by dentine: Anin vitro
study. Int Endod J 2000;33:126-31.
Emilson CG. Susceptibility of various microorganisms to chlorhexidine. Scand J Dent Res 1977;85:255-65.
Davies GE, Francis J, Martin AR, Rose FL, Swain G. 1:6-Di-4'-chlorophenyldiguanidohexane (hibitane); laboratory investigation of a new antibacterial agent of high potency. Br J Pharmacol Chemother 1954;9:192-6.
Hennessey TS. Some antibacterial properties of chlorhexidine. J Periodontal Res Suppl 1973;12:61-7.
Mohammed AN, Reddy KN, Raj KS. An assessment of bactericidal effect of two different types of lasers on Enterococcus faecalis
: Anin vitro
study. J Dent Lasers 2012;6:2-6.
Gutknecht N, Franzen R, Schippers M, Lampert F. Bactericidal effect of a 980-nm diode laser in the root canal wall dentin of bovine teeth. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2004;22:9-13.
Gutknecht N, Moritz A, Conrads G, Sievert T, Lampert F. Bactericidal effect of the Nd:YAG laser inin vitro
root canals. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1996;14:77-80.
Gutknecht N, van Gogswaardt D, Conrads G, Apel C, Schubert C, Lampert F. Diode laser radiation and its bactericidal effect in root canal wall dentin. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2000;18:57-60.
Stevanovic MP, Stevanovic M, Mirceva M, Mila M. Bactericidal effects of Er: YAG laser irriradiation in root canals. J Oral Laser Appl 2004;4:43-6.
Klinke T, Klimm W, Gutknecht N. Antibacterial effects of Nd:YAG laser irradiation within root canal dentin. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1997;15:29-31.
Moshonov J, Orstavik D, Yamauchi S, Pettiette M, Trope M. Nd:YAG laser irradiation in root canal disinfection. Endod Dent Traumatol 1995;11:220-4.
Fegan SE, Steiman HR. Comparative evaluation of the antibacterial effects of intracanal Nd:YAG laser irradiation: Anin vitro
study. J Endod 1995;21:415-7.
Moritz A, Schoop U, Goharkhay K, Jakolitsch S, Kluger W, Wernisch J, et al.
The bactericidal effect of Nd:YAG, Ho:YAG, and Er:YAG laser irradiation in the root canal: Anin vitro
comparison. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1999;17:161-4.
Vaarkamp J, ten Bosch JJ, Verdonschot EH. Propagation of light through human dental enamel and dentine. Caries Res 1995;29:8-13.
Odor TM, Chandler NP, Watson TF, Ford TR, McDonald F. Laser light transmission in teeth: A study of the patterns in different species. Int Endod J 1999;32:296-302.
Moritz A. Oral Laser Application. Vienna, Austria: Quintessence Publishing Company; 2006.
Garcez AS, Nuñez SC, Hamblin MR, Ribeiro MS. Antimicrobial effects of photodynamic therapy on patients with necrotic pulps and periapical lesion. J Endod 2008;34:138-42.
Niranjan Ashok Vatkar
Shram Safalya, Sector 24, Plot 71, Pradhikaran, Nigdi, Pune - 411 044, Maharashtra
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]