Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Home About us Editorial Board Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online: 582
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 338-342
Effects of thermal fatigue on shear punch strength of tooth-colored restoratives


1 Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119083, Republic of Singapore
2 Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119083; Department of Dentistry, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital and Jurong Medical Centre, Jurong Health Services, Singapore 609606, Republic of Singapore

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission09-Mar-2016
Date of Decision19-May-2016
Date of Acceptance10-Jun-2016
Date of Web Publication18-Jul-2016
 

   Abstract 

Aims: This study investigated the effect of thermal fatigue on the shear strength of a range of tooth-colored restorative materials including giomers, zirconia-reinforced glass ionomer cement (GIC), nano-particle resin-modified GIC, highly viscous GICs, and composite resin.
Materials and Methods: Twenty specimens of each material were fabricated in standardized washers (17 mm outer diameter, 9 mm internal diameter, 1 mm thick). The specimens were cured, stored in 100% humidity at 37.5°C for 24 h, and randomly divided into two groups of 10. Group A specimens were nonthermocycled (NT) and stored in distilled water at 37°C for 168 h. Group B specimens were thermocycled (TC) for 10,000 cycles (168 h) with baths X, Y, and Z adjusted to 35°C, 15°C, and 45°C, respectively. Each cycle had dwell times of 28 s in X, and 2s in Y/Z in the order XYXZ. Specimens then underwent shear punch testing at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min with a 2 kN load cell. Statistical analysis of shear strength was done using t-test and two-way ANOVA/Scheffe's post hoc test at significance level P< 0.05.
Results: The effect of thermal fatigue on shear strength was material dependent. Except for the “sculptable” giomer (Beautifil II) and a highly viscous GIC (Fuji IX GP Fast), no significant differences in shear strength were generally observed between the NT and TC groups. For both groups, the composite resin (Filtek Z250XT) had the highest shear strength while the zirconia-reinforced (zirconomer) and a highly viscous GIC (Ketac Molar Quick) had the lowest.
Conclusions: The effect of thermocycling on shear strength was material dependent. Thermal fatigue, however, did not significantly influence the shear strength of most materials assessed. The “sculptable” composite and giomer were significantly stronger than the other materials evaluated. Shear strength of the “flowable” injectable hybrid giomer was intermediate between the composite and GICs.

Keywords: Composite; giomer; glass ionomer; shear strength; thermal fatigue

How to cite this article:
Melody FM, U-Jin YA, Natalie TW, Elizabeth TW, Chien JY. Effects of thermal fatigue on shear punch strength of tooth-colored restoratives. J Conserv Dent 2016;19:338-42

How to cite this URL:
Melody FM, U-Jin YA, Natalie TW, Elizabeth TW, Chien JY. Effects of thermal fatigue on shear punch strength of tooth-colored restoratives. J Conserv Dent [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Dec 14];19:338-42. Available from: http://www.jcd.org.in/text.asp?2016/19/4/338/186444

   Introduction Top


Thermal changes in the mouth may affect the clinical longevity of restorations. Intraoral temperature changes are induced during eating, drinking, and even breathing.[1] These thermal changes induce mechanical stresses and can cause gap volume changes leading to marginal leakage, staining as well as secondary caries.[2],[3],[4] Although the effects of thermal fatigue on physicomechanical properties have been investigated, results were equivocal. While some studies have reported that thermal fatigue significantly reduced fracture resistance [5],[6] and impaired marginal adaptation,[7],[8] others have found that it improves physicomechanical properties, including bond strength [9] and hardness.[10],[11] Reasons suggested for the disparity in results include differences in thermocycling regimen, type of restorative material, and the “C” factor.[12] When comparing these studies, it is also important to take into consideration the differences in research design and the mechanical properties investigated.

As new and novel tooth-colored restoratives are introduced to the dental profession, studies on their durability and longevity, especially when subjected to intraoral thermal and other stresses are required. The two ends of the continuum of tooth-colored restoratives are represented by composite resins and glass ionomer cements (GICs), respectively. While composites offer superior strength, excellent esthetics, and high wear resistance, GICs offer sustained fluoride release/recharge and chemical bonding to teeth. In an effort to combine the advantages of these two materials, various hybrid materials have been developed. These hybrid materials include resin-modified GICs (RMGICs), compomers (polyacid-modified composites), and giomers.

Giomer restoratives utilize prereacted glass ionomer (PRG) technology to form its glass ionomer phase. The glass ionomer fillers consist of fluorosilicate particles that are prereacted with polyacrylic acid, and these fillers are incorporated into a resin matrix. The PRG phase is assumed to promote sustained fluoride release via ligand exchanges within the ion-rich hydrogel without disrupting the integrity of the filler–matrix interface that typically occurs in compomer materials.[13]

To improve physicomechanical properties and reduce early moisture sensitivity, novel GIC materials are constantly being developed. Recent improvements in GIC restoratives had been achieved through advances in glass formulations, refinement of glass particle sizes, increasing powder: Liquid ratios, incorporation of resins, and zirconia reinforcement. While thermocycling was reported to enhance the hardness of giomers due to increased postcure maturation on contact with heat,[14] literature pertaining to the effects of thermocycling on the new glass ionomer materials are still scarce. Research is thus warranted to better comprehend the mechanical performance of these innovative restorative materials.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of thermal fatigue on the shear strength of a range of tooth-colored restorative materials including giomers, zirconia-reinforced, and highly viscous GICs, nano-particle RMGICs as well as a composite resin. It was hypothesized that thermal fatigue has no significant effect on the shear strength of these materials.


   Materials and Methods Top


Seven restorative materials were selected from the range of currently available tooth-colored restorative materials. They included giomers (Beautifil II [BF2], Shofu; Beautifil Flow Plus [BFP], Shofu), novel zirconia-reinforced GIC (Zirconomer [ZRM], Shofu), highly viscous GIC (Fuji IX GP Fast [F9F], GC; Ketac Molar Quick [KMQ], 3M-ESPE), nano-particle resin-modified GIC (Ketac Nano [KN], 3M-ESPE), and a composite resin (Filtek Z250XT [Z250], 3M-ESPE). The detailed technical profiles of the materials evaluated are shown in [Table 1]. The materials were mixed according to the manufacturers' instructions where applicable and/or dispensed directly into stainless steel ring washers (17 mm outer diameter, 9 mm inner diameter, and 1 mm thickness), covered with mylar strips and sandwiched between two glass slides. Gentle pressure was applied to the glass slides to extrude excess material. Light-cured specimens were then polymerized using an LED light cure unit (DB-686-Ib, Coxo, Foshan Guangdong, China). The mean intensity of the light source was checked with a commercial radiometer (Light Meter-200, Rolence Enterprise Inc., Chungli, Taiwan) and found to be above 1200 Mw/Cm 2. All light-polymerized materials were light-cured for 40 s and left alone for 15 min. Chemically-cured materials were also allowed to set for 15 min. After the initial setting period, the glass slides and mylar strips were removed, and specimens were then stored in 100% relative humidity at 37°C for 24 h. Thickness of the specimens was measured by a digital caliper to ensure that the specimens were within 1.00 ± 0.01 mm thickness.
Table 1: Technical profiles of the materials evaluated

Click here to view


Twenty specimens were made for each material and randomly divided into two groups of 10. Specimens in Group A formed the nonthermocycled group (NT) and were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 168 h. Specimens in Group B formed the thermocycled group (TC) and were thermal cycled for 10000 cycles. Thermal cycling was conducted using a computer thermal fatigue system (NUS-AMA, Singapore, Singapore) comprising a two-axis computer-controlled robotic gantry system, temperature-controlled baths, and a controller with a software interface. Employing gale and Darvell's advocated thermal cycling regimen,[15] the temperatures of the water in the baths X, Y, and Z were adjusted to 35°C, 15°C, and 45°C, respectively. One thermal cycle consisted of the cycle XYXZ, with dwell time in container X being 28s, and 2s each in containers Y and Z. The total time for each thermal cycle was 1 min leading to a total thermal cycling time of 7 days (168 h in total).

Shear strength testing was conducted using a custom-designed micro-punch apparatus [Figure 1] mounted on an Instron Micro-tester (Model 5848, Instron Corp, Norwood, MA, USA). The specimens were positioned in the apparatus with the cured side facing up, via means of a self-locating recess, which provided a snug fit. The specimens were restrained using a screw clamp to a torque of 2.5 Nm using a torque wrench. A tool steel punch with a flat end 1.95-mm in diameter was used to create shear force by sliding through a punch hole with a radial clearance of 0.01-mm. Prior to testing, the entire experimental setup, including the Instron machine and its 2 kN load cell, was calibrated to ensure minimal frictional force as compared to the force value required to fracture the test specimens. Testing was done at a crosshead speed of 0.5-mm/min, and the maximum load was recorded. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Shear strength data were subjected to t-test and two-way ANOVA/Scheffe's post hoc test at significance level P < 0.05.
Figure 1: Schematic representation of the shear punch test apparatus

Click here to view



   Results Top


The mean shear strength values of the materials after incubation (NT) and thermocycling are shown in [Figure 2] and [Table 2]. The effect of thermal fatigue on shear strength was found to be material dependent. t-test showed no significant differences in shear strength between NT and TC specimens for all materials with the exception of F9F and BF2. Two-way ANOVA showed shear strength to be both material and thermal fatigue dependent. Results of two-way ANOVA and Scheffe's post hoc test for both TC and NT groups are shown in [Table 3]. Z250 and BF2 were found to be significantly stronger while ZRM and KMQ were significantly weaker than the other materials evaluated. The shear strength of the “flowable” injectable hybrid giomer BFP was intermediate between the composite and glass ionomers.
Figure 2: Mean shear strength of materials after incubation and thermocycling

Click here to view
Table 2: Mean shear strength of materials after incubation and thermocycling

Click here to view
Table 3: Results of statistical analysis between materials for both nonthermocycled and thermocycled groups

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The thermal cycling protocol used in this study was based on Gale and Darvell and their suggested estimate of 10,000 cycles. The extremes in temperatures were fixed at 15°C and 45°C as they were the lowest/highest comfortable temperatures reported fromin vivo studies.[15] As the effect of thermal fatigue on shear strength was found to be material dependent, the null hypothesis was rejected. No significant differences in shear strength between TC and NT specimens were found for the majority of materials evaluated. Findings corroborated the work of Mair and Vowles, who concluded that “the effects of cyclic temperature changes likely to be encountered in the mouth are not a significant factor in the reduction of the fracture strength of composite filling materials”. [16] The shear strengths of F9F and BF2 were, however, significantly increased by thermal cycling. Improvements in strength can be attributed to an increase in “bound” water in the glass ionomer components that may be enhanced by thermal fatigue.[17],[18] As the hydration of GICs increases, so will the strength of the GICs. Although BFP, ZRM, KN, and KMQ also contained glass ionomers; their shear strengths were not significantly affected by thermocycling. The discrepancies in findings may be attributed to differences in glass ionomer content and composition and warrants further investigation.

Shear punch test was chosen as the mode of testing in our experiment. Shear punch test has been used for the standard testing of plastics and was advocated as a standard specification test across a broad range of restorative materials.[19],[20],[21] Results are clinically relevant as shear stresses are induced in teeth and restorations during mastication by occlusal or incisal forces.[21],[22] The advantages of the shear punch test have been reported by Nomoto et al. The main advantage, over other tests, is the ease of preparing good quality specimens. The “quality of the edges of the disc around the circumference has no direct influence on the testing outcome” for shear punch testing. On the other hand, the quality of the surfaces and edges of specimens is most critical in flexural, compressive, and diametral testing. The only requirement for shear punch testing is that the two main faces of the disc specimens are flat and parallel.[19] Ensuring parallel faces are greatly facilitated by the use of standard washers for specimen preparation, which was done in this study.

Nomoto et al.[19] reported that shear punch strength values decreased in the order of composite > giomer > amalgam > compomer > RMGIC > GIC > polycarboxylate. In comparison, ranking of shear strength in this study was as follows: Z250 (composite resin) > BF2 (giomer) > F9F (highly viscous GIC) > KN (nano-particle RMGIC) > BFP (injectable hybrid giomer) > ZRM (zirconia-reinforced GIC) = KMQ (highly viscous GIC). Z250, a nano-hybrid composite resin, had the highest shear strength. Composite resins are generally stronger than GICs. Nomoto et al.[19] reported that the higher strength associated with composite materials is consistent with their ability to resist fracture in relatively thin sections when used in adhesive restorations. In addition, the mechanical properties of composite materials are improved in direct relation to the amount of filler added. This is the same for glass ionomers with increasing powder: Liquid ratio up to a critical level. The high shear strength of Z250 can be attributed to not only its high filler content (81.8% weight) but also to the addition of surface-modified zirconia/silica with a median particle size of approximately 3 microns or less as well as nonagglomerated/non-aggregated 20 nanometer surface-modified silica particles. Furthermore, Z250 is a nano-hybrid composite resin, which contains sub-100 nm to micron-sized particles. According to its manufacturer,[23] the wide distribution of particle sizes can lead to high filler loading with resultant high strength and wear resistance.

The second strongest material was shown to be BF2. This can also be attributed to its high filler loading (83.0% weight) obtained by the surface PRG fillers and discrete nano fillers (10–20 nm). The results of this study were consistent with others including that of Yap et al.,[11] who used a microindentation technique and found BF2 to be significantly harder than highly viscous and resin-modified GICs as well as some composites. The significantly lower shear strength of the injectable hybrid composite BFP when compared to BF2 can be attributed to the lower filler loading (67.3% weight).

The GICs in this study were ZRM, F9F, KMQ, and KN. Among the GICs, F9F was the strongest, followed by KN. ZRM and KMQ were significantly weaker than the other materials evaluated. Highly viscous GIC F9F is an improved version of Fuji IX GP. Wang et al.[21] reported that “the shortened maturation time of Fuji IX GP Fast may make it less susceptible to the effect of early water exposure.” This could have contributed to the high strength of F9F. The higher strength of F9F can also be attributed to its higher powder: Liquid ratio (3.6:1). Kanachanavasita et al.[24] has showed that for restorative grade materials, resin-modified cements can absorb water up to 7% by mass. The amount of water uptake by RMGICs is dependent on its poly (HEMA) content. Hence, it is possible that water sorption could have lowered the strength of the RMGIC, KN.

The nano-particle RMGIC, KN was found to be the second strongest GIC. According to the manufacturer, it contains significantly fewer voids than Fuji II LC and Fuji IX as it is dispensed from the Quick Mix Capsule. Nomoto et al. have reported that “the porosity of a cured restorative material may lead to reduced physical properties”. [25] Hence, fewer voids lead to reduced porosity and this may in turn contribute to increased physical properties. An interesting point to note is that unlike most GICs which require a powder and liquid to be mixed, KN uses a paste-paste system to provide faster, easier, less messy and more reproducible dispensing, and mixing compared to powder-liquid systems.[26] The nanotechnology in KN, together with resin modification, could contribute to its higher strength compared to KMQ and ZRM.

KMQ is a “heavy-bodied, metal-free glass ionomer”,[27] with a powder to liquid ratio of 3.4:1. The powder contains Calcium-Lanthanum-Aluminum fluorosilicate glass while the liquid consists of mainly polycarboxylic acid as in conventional GICs. The low shear strength of KMQ may be attributed to the fact that it is not reinforced by resin or nanoparticles (unlike KN) and has a lower powder: Liquid ratio than F9F (3.4:1 vs. 3.6:1). The zirconia-reinforced GIC, ZRM, was noncapsulated and required hand-mixing. A capsulated version of this material was recently introduced into the market. When compared to the other capsulated and triturated materials, an even mix and consistent texture was difficult to achieve with ZRM. This could be a contributing factor to its lower shear strength. No significant difference in shear strength was observed between ZRM and KMQ.


   Conclusion Top


The effect of thermocycling on shear strength was found to be material dependent. While the shear strengths of most materials were not affected by thermal fatigue, strength of the “sculptable” giomer (BF2), and a highly viscous GIC (F9F) were significantly increased by thermocycling. The regular “sculptable” composite (Z250) had the highest shear punch strength while another highly viscous GIC (KMQ) and zirconia-reinforced GIC (ZRM) had the lowest. The shear strength of the “flowable” injectable hybrid giomer (BFP) was intermediate between the composite and GICs.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the manufacturers for their materials support.

Financial support and sponsorship

NUS UROP grant.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Boehm RF. Thermal environment of teeth during open-mouth respiration. J Dent Res 1972;51:75-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Nelsen RJ, Wolcott RB, Paffenbarger GC. Fluid exchange at the margins of dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1952;44:288-95.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Torstenson B, Brännström M. Contraction gap under composite resin restorations: Effect of hygroscopic expansion and thermal stress. Oper Dent 1988;13:24-31.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Brown WS, Jacobs HR, Thompson RE. Thermal fatigue in teeth. J Dent Res 1972;51:461-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Bonilla E, White SN. Fatigue of resin-bonded amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1996;21:122-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Medina Tirado JI, Nagy WW, Dhuru VB, Ziebert AJ. The effect of thermocycling on the fracture toughness and hardness of core buildup materials. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:474-80.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Coelho-De-Souza FH, Camacho GB, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Fracture resistance and gap formation of MOD restorations: Influence of restorative technique, bevel preparation and water storage. Oper Dent 2008;33:37-43.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
de Paula AB, Duque C, Correr-Sobrinho L, Puppin-Rontani RM. Effect of restorative technique and thermal/mechanical treatment on marginal adaptation and compressive strength of esthetic restorations. Oper Dent 2008;33:434-40.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Bedran-De-Castro AK, Pereira PN, Pimenta LA. Long-term bond strength of restorations subjected to thermo-mechanical stresses over time. Am J Dent 2004;17:337-41.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Yap AU, Wee KE, Teoh SH. Effects of cyclic temperature changes on hardness of composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2002;27:25-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Yap AU, Wang X, Wu X, Chung SM. Comparative hardness and modulus of tooth-colored restoratives: A depth-sensing microindentation study. Biomaterials 2004;25:2179-85.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Hakimeh S, Vaidyanathan J, Houpt ML, Vaidyanathan TK, Von Hagen S. Microleakage of compomer class V restorations: Effect of load cycling, thermal cycling, and cavity shape differences. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:194-203.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Roberts TA, Miyai K, Ikemura K, Fuchigami K, Kitamura T. Fluoride ion sustained release pre-formed glass ionomer filler and dental compositions containing the same. US Patent No. 5883153; 1999.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Harris JS, Jacobsen PH, O'Doherty DM. The effect of curing light intensity and test temperature on the dynamic mechanical properties of two polymer composites. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:635-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89-99.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mair LH, Vowles R. The effect of thermal cycling on the fracture toughness of seven composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 1989;5:23-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.
Wilson AD, Paddon JM, Crisp S. The hydration of dental cements. J Dent Res 1979;58:1065-71.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.
Wilson AD, Crisp S, Paddon JM. The hydration of a glass ionomer (APSA) cement. Br Polym J 1981;13:66-70.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Nomoto R, Carrick TE, McCabe JF. Suitability of a shear punch test for dental restorative materials. Dent Mater 2001;17:415-21.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
American Society for Testing and Materials Standards. Standard Test Method for Shear Strength of Plastics by Punch Tool. ASTM D732-6. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 1993.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Wang XY, Yap AU, Ngo HC. Effect of early water exposure on the strength of glass ionomer restoratives. Oper Dent 2006;31:584-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Roydhouse RH. Punch-shear test for dental purposes. J Dent Res 1970;49:131-6.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]    
23.
Filtek™ Z350 XT Universal Restorative Technical Product Profile. 3M-ESPE; 2010. Available from: http://www.multimedia. 3m.com/mws/mediawebserver?mwsId=66666UuZjcFSLXTtnXMtNxTcEVuQEcuZgVs6EVs6E666666-- and fn=z350xt_tpp.pdf. [Last cited on 2012 Sep 20].  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Kanchanavasita W, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. Water sorption characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Biomaterials 1997;18:343-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Nomoto R, Komoriyama M, McCabe JF, Hirano S. Effect of mixing method on the porosity of encapsulated glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater 2004;20:972-8.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Ketac™ Nano Technical Data Sheet. 3M-ESPE; 2007. Available from: http://www.multimedia. 3m.com/mws/mediawebserver?mwsId=66666UF6EVsSyXTtnxTclxMEEVtQEVs6EVs6EVs6E666666--&fn=ketac_nano_tds.pdf. [Last cited on 2012 Sep 20].  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Product Dossier Ketac Molar Quick. 3M-ESPE; 2000. Available from: http://www.multimedia. 3m.com/mws/mediawebserver?mwsId=SSSSSu7zK1fslxtUMx_GMx2Zev7qe17zHvTSevTSeSSSSSS--&fn=ketac_molar_tp_en.pdf. [Last cited on 2012 Sep 20].  Back to cited text no. 27
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Tan Wei Min Natalie
Department of Dentistry, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital and Jurong Medical Centre, Jurong Health Services, 1 Jurong East Street 21, Singapore 609606
Republic of Singapore
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.186444

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1404    
    Printed17    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded160    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal