Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Home About us Editorial Board Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online: 494
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 536-540

A comparative in vitro efficacy of conventional rotatory and chemomechanical caries removal: Influence on cariogenic flora, microhardness, and residual composition


1 Dental and advanced Studies Research Center "Dr. Keisaburo Miyata"; Deparment of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Autonomous University State of Mexico (UAEMex), State of Mexico, Mexico
2 Dental and advanced Studies Research Center "Dr. Keisaburo Miyata"; Deparment of Orthodontics, Autonomous University State of Mexico (UAEMex), State of Mexico, Mexico
3 Dental and advanced Studies Research Center "Dr. Keisaburo Miyata"; Deparment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Autonomous University State of Mexico (UAEMex), State of Mexico, Mexico
4 Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Science, Division of Pharmacology, Meikai University, Saitama, Japan
5 Deparment of Nanomaterials, Center for Research in Sustainable Chemistry (CIQS), School of Chemistry, Autonomous University State of Mexico (UAEMex), State of Mexico, Mexico
6 Biomaterials Science, School of Dentistry, Meikai University, Saitama, Japan

Correspondence Address:
Rogelio Jose Scougall-Vilchis
Department of Orthodontics, Dental and Advanced Studies Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Autonomous University State of Mexico, Tollocan-Jesus Carranza, Colonia Universidad, Toluca
Mexico
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.144588

Rights and Permissions

Background: Chemomechanical caries removal system is part of the minimal invasive dentistry; the aim of the study was to compare the amount of bacteria after caries removal with chemomechanical system and conventional rotatory instruments and to test the Vickers microhardness and micro-RAMAN analysis of residual dentin after excavation. Materials and Methods: Molars were induced for demineralization, confirmed with DIAGNOdent; Streptococcus mutans were inoculated into the cavities and filled. Caries removal was performed with rotatory instruments and chemomechanical system; surviving bacteria were cultured for 24 and 48 hours at 37΀C. Vickers microhardness and micro-RAMAN analysis were tested after excavation. Data were analyzed with Wilcoxon, continuity correction, odds ratio, ANOVA post hoc Tukey test, and Spearman correlation. Results: Demineralization was significantly detectable at 240 hours of incubation; conventional rotatory instruments and chemomechanical caries removal were effective in 19.4%-22.6% and 25.8%-32.3%, respectively. Vickers microhardness of chemomechanical system was higher (P < 0.0001) than conventional rotatory instruments and comparable to healthy dentin. Micro-RAMAN analysis showed that healthy dentin is correlated to chemomechanical system (R 2 = 0.683, P < 0.00001) and drilling with burs (R 2 = 0.139, P < 0.00001). Conclusion: The chemomechanical system is effective for caries elimination, comparable to conventional rotatory instruments; the remaining Vickers microhardness and composition surface tissue are similar to healthy dentin.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed950    
    Printed26    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded179    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal