Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Home About us Editorial Board Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online: 146
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 


 
Table of Contents   
REVIEW ARTICLE  
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 312-319
C-shaped root canal configuration: A review of literature


1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Goa Dental College and Hospital, Bambolim, India
2 Consulting Endodontist, Goa, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission23-Oct-2013
Date of Decision08-Dec-2013
Date of Acceptance23-Feb-2014
Date of Web Publication10-Jul-2014
 

   Abstract 

The aim is to review and discuss the etiology, incidence, anatomic features, classification, diagnosis and management of the C-shaped canal configuration. C-shaped canal configuration is a variation that has a racial predilection and is commonly seen in mandibular second molars. The intricacies present in this variation of canal morphology can pose a challenge to the clinician during negotiation, debridement and obturation. Manual and electronic searches of literature were performed from 1979 to 2012, in Pub Med by crossing the keywords: C-shaped canals, mandibular second molar, mandibular first premolar, root canal morphology. Knowledge of the C-shaped canal configuration is essential to achieve success in endodontic therapy. Radiographic and clinical diagnoses can aid in identification and negotiation of the fan-shaped areas and intricacies of the C-shaped anatomy. Effective management of this anomalous canal configuration can be achieved with rotary and hand instrumentation assisted with sonics and ultrasonics. Modifications in the obturation techniques will ensure a 3-dimensional fill of the canal system and chamber retained restorations like amalgam or composites, serve as satisfactory post endodontic restorations.

Keywords: C-shaped canals; mandibular second molar; root canal configuration

How to cite this article:
Fernandes M, de Ataide I, Wagle R. C-shaped root canal configuration: A review of literature. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:312-9

How to cite this URL:
Fernandes M, de Ataide I, Wagle R. C-shaped root canal configuration: A review of literature. J Conserv Dent [serial online] 2014 [cited 2017 Jul 26];17:312-9. Available from: http://www.jcd.org.in/text.asp?2014/17/4/312/136437

   Introduction Top


A thorough knowledge of the root canal anatomy and its variations is required for achieving success in root canal therapy, along with diagnosis, treatment planning and clinical expertise. [1],[2],[3],[4] One such variation of the root canal system is the C-shaped canal configuration. It is termed so because of the C-shaped cross-sectional anatomical configuration of the root and root canal. [5] This condition was described for the first time in literature by Cooke and Cox [6] in 1979, though Weine et al., [7] reported that several clinicians had suggested its presence in lectures earlier. Manning in his description of root canal anatomy of mandibular second molars, stated that C-shaped roots and root canals were first documented in 1908 and 1911, after examination of the skeletal remains of members of the Neanderthal race, which were predecessors of the Mongoloid race that includes Asian populations. [8] Numerous incidence studies prove the racial predilection of this variation. [1],[5],[7],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29] Though most commonly found in mandibular second molars, [1],[5],[7],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[30],[31],[32] the C-shaped canal configuration may also occur in mandibular premolars, [24],[25],[26],[27],[28],[33] maxillary molars, [3],[34] and mandibular third molars. [3],[29] The C-shaped canal configuration presents with variations in both the number and location of the canal(s), as the canal(s) courses from the coronal to the apical third. [2] The complexity of this canal configuration proves to be a challenge with respect to debridement and obturation and possibly the prognosis during root canal therapy. [2],[4] Recognition of a C-shaped canal configuration before treatment can facilitate effective management, which will prevent irreparable damage that may put the tooth in severe jeopardy. [7],[35] The aim of this article is to discuss the etiology, incidence, anatomic features, classification, diagnosis and management of the C-shaped canal configuration. Manual and electronic searches of literature were performed from 1979 to 2012, in PubMed by crossing the keywords: C-shaped canals, mandibular second molar, mandibular first premolar, root canal morphology.


   Etiology Top


Ever since the identification of the C-shaped canal anatomy, various causes have been postulated for its formation. Earlier, teeth with C-shaped roots were likened to taurodents; however, the definition of teeth that fit this description has been changed. [8] Manning [8] also conjectured that the C-shaped anatomy with separate canals could be the result of age changes due to deposition of dentin on the walls of the canal. However, this theory was refuted as separate canals in roots with C-shaped anatomy were observed even in patients under 40 years of age. [12] The failure of fusion of Hertwig's epithelial sheath is the most lucid explanation for the formation of the C-shaped canal configuration. [36] Failure of the Hertwig's epithelial sheath to fuse on the buccal side will result in the formation of a lingual groove, and failure to fuse on the lingual would result in a buccal groove. [8] Hence, this fusion is not uniform and a thin interradicular ribbon connects the two roots together. [10],[37] Failure of the sheath to fuse on both the buccal and lingual sides will result in the formation of a conical or prism-shaped root. [8] Fusion is most likely to occur if the distance between the root canals is small. [32] Earlier, the irregular fusion of the Hertwig's epithelial sheath was attributed to trauma, such as radiation or chemical interference, but following the documentation of racial predilection, it is more likely to be of genetic origin. [8],[38] The root canals in such teeth merge in a very wide, slot-like, single, continuous root canal morphology, which can assume the shape of a letter C. [39]


   Incidence Top


The C-shaped canal configuration shows an ethnic predilection. As can be evidenced from [Table 1], it has frequently been reported in countries belonging to the Asian continent. East Asian population groups like Chinese (0.6%-41.27%) and Koreans (31.3%-45.5%) display a high prevalence of this variant. [9],[14],[15],[21],[22],[23],[27],[28] Among the South Asian countries, Burmese population showed a prevalence of 22.4%, which was much higher than the Indian, Thai or Sri Lankan population. [11],[13],[17],[18],[20],[24],[26] Higher incidence of C-shaped anatomy was documented in Lebanese population (19.1%) as compared to the other West Asian population groups (Iranian, Jordanian, Saudi Arabian). [5],[10],[12],[19] An incidence of 10% was reported in Sudanese population from the African continent. [16]
Table 1: Incidence of C-shaped root canal configuration

Click here to view


Canal configuration has been shown to have a high prevalence in mandibular second molars with a percentage ranging between 2.7%-45.5%. [1],[5],[7],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[30],[31],[32] Incidence studies in mandibular premolars have been reported in Chinese, Indian and Iranian population, with the highest frequency being reported in the Chinese population (29.7%). [24],[25],[26],[27],[33] The C-shaped variation in canal anatomy has also been reported in maxillary first molars (0.12%), maxillary third molars (4.7%), mandibular third molars (3.5%-4%) and mandibular second premolars (1%). [3],[28],[29],[34] Singla & Aggarwal [40] reported finding a C-shaped canal configuration in the palatal canal of a maxillary second molar. The possibility of finding C-shaped canal anatomy in maxillary lateral incisors with type III radicular groove has also been documented. [41] There is no correlation of C-shaped canal configuration with gender and also with age and tooth position. Bilateral occurrence of C-shaped canals has been reported in a percentage of 70%-81%. [22],[42]


   Anatomic features Top


The following are the pertinent features in relation to the external root anatomy and configuration of the pulp chamber and the root canal system usually found in C-shaped mandibular molars, though similar features may be found in C-shaped maxillary molars and mandibular premolars.

Roots

A conical or square configuration is characteristic of roots having a C-shaped canal. [8],[43] The root configuration of molars having this canal shape may be represented by fusion of either the facial or lingual aspect of the mesial and distal roots. The roots display an occluso-apical groove on the buccal or lingual surface, which represent the line of fusion between mesial and distal roots. The surface opposite this radicular groove is convex. [2] Peiris et al., [22] referred to the C-shaped roots of mandibular second molars as being 'gutter-shaped'.

Pulp chamber

The pulp chambers of teeth with C-shaped canals mostly have greater apico-occlusal width with a low bifurcation. [13] This results in a deep pulp chamber floor, which has uncommon anatomical configuration. [37] The connecting slit that gives the tooth its name of "C-shaped" may have closure to the buccal or lingual. If the buccal portion of the mesial and distal roots is fused, the slit goes through the area of fusion, and so the "C" is closed to the lingual. If the lingual portion of the roots is fused, then the "C" is closed to the buccal. [7]

Root canal system

The root canal system of C-shaped canals shows broad, fan-shaped communications from the coronal to the apical third of the canal. The canal(s) change shape from the coronal aspect of the root. For example: A continuous C-shaped canal would change to a semicolon configuration in the midroot and then becomes continuous C-shape in the apical third of the root or vice versa. [2] Accessory and lateral canals, inter-canal communications and apical delta can be found in a prevalence of 11-41%, in the apical region of C-shaped canals. [44] Cross-sectional C-shaped canal morphology reveals thinner lingual walls than buccal with the lowest value measured being 0.26 mm. [4] The varied intricacies in the C-shaped canal anatomy are outlined in the section on classification.

Mandibular premolars

All C-shaped premolars have shallow or deep radicular grooves located on the external mesiolingual surface of the root. [27],[45],[46] These grooves usually start 3 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and may or not extend to the apex. The mean depth of the grooves at some areas on the root can be around 1.5 mm. [46] This must be taken into consideration during cleaning and shaping. The morphology of C-shaped canals in mandibular first premolars may present one of the following four features: Continuous C-shaped canal only, semilunar buccal canal only, combination of continuous C-shape and semilunarbuccal canal or C-shaped canal interrupted by non-C-shaped canal. [27]


   Classification Top


The clinician should not assume a fixed spatial relationship, if a C-shape is identified, but rather be aware of other possibilities. [7] To facilitate a better understanding of the root canal anatomy of C-shaped canals the numerous classifications were proposed. The earliest classification were proposed by Manning [1] and Melton et al. [2] However, there was no clear distinction between the categories in Melton's classification. [47] Besides, Melton's and Manning's classifications describe only the appearances of the canal orifices, but fail to describe how the C-shaped configuration may vary along the root length. [4],[47],[48] . Various other classifications were then proposed by Al-Fouzan [12] , Fan et al., [35] Fan et al., [47] Gao et al., [49] and Min et al. [50]


   Diagnosis Top


Preoperative radiographic diagnosis

A preoperative radiograph usually provides various clues in the identification of any variation in root canal morphology. However, there are differences in opinions on the value of a preoperative radiograph in diagnosing a C-shaped case. Cooke & Cox [6] were of the opinion that it is not possible to diagnose C-shaped canals on preoperative radiographs. Conversely, some investigators described four radiographic characteristics that can allow prediction of the existence of this anatomical condition: radicular fusion, radicular proximity, a large distal canal or a blurred image of a third canal in between. [10],[12] Hence, a C-shaped root in a mandibular second molar may present radiographically as a single-fused root or as two distinct roots with a communication. [11],[13] When the communication or fin connecting the two roots is very thin, it is not visible on the radiograph and may thus give the appearance of two distinct roots. [10] The radiograph may also reveal a large and deep pulp chamber, usually found in C-shaped molars. [10],[13] Fan et al., [35] divided the radiographic appearance that the C-shaped teeth are present with three types [Figure 1]a]. In type I, the C-shaped canal system actually appears as two distinct canals, because the isthmus that links the mesial and distal "main" canals is very thin and hence is not detected radiographically. In the radiographic type II, the mesial and distal canals assume their own individual course to the apex. Thus, there are apparently two distinct canals on the radiograph. In type III, one canal continues its course to the apex giving the image of a distinct canal whereas the other(s) proceeds very close to or within the fused area, that is, the "web" between the two main roots in the apical third. Hence, the canal may seem to exit into the groove radiographically. Wang et al., [23] reported a higher incidence in the recognition of C-shaped canals using a combination of radiography and clinical examination under the microscope (41.27%) than using the radiography (34.64%) or clinical examination (39.18%) alone.
Figure 1: (a) Radiographic classifi cation of C-shaped canal configuration. (b) Classifi cation of pulp chamber fl oor of teeth with C-shaped canal confi guration

Click here to view


Preoperative clinical diagnosis

The crown morphology of teeth with C-shaped anatomy does not present with any special features that can aid in the diagnosis. A longitudinal groove on lingual or buccal surface of the root with a C-shaped anatomy may be present. [47] Such narrow grooves may predispose the tooth to localized periodontal disease, which may be the first diagnostic indication. [13]

Clinical diagnosis following access cavity preparation

Some investigators asserted that since radiographic diagnosis is difficult, clinical diagnosis of C-shaped canals can be established only following access to the pulp chamber. [2],[31] The pulpal floor in C-shaped teeth can vary from peninsula like with a continuous C-shaped orifice to non C-shaped floors as per the classification given by Min et al., [Figure 1]b]. [50] However, when a C-shaped canal orifice is observed, say, under the operating microscope, one cannot assume that such a shape continues throughout its length. [47] Fan et al., [47] stated that for mandibular second molar to qualify as having a C-shaped canal system, it has to exhibit all the following three features:

  1. Fused roots;
  2. A longitudinal groove on lingual or buccal surface of the root;
  3. At least one cross-section of the canal should belong to the C1, C2, or C3 configuration, as per Fan's anatomic classification [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Fan et al.,'s anatomic classifi cation of C-shaped canal configuration

Click here to view


Clinical and radiographic diagnoses during working length determination

Working length radiographs are more helpful than preoperative and final radiographs in diagnosing C-shaped canals. [31] In a true C-shaped canal, (single canal running from the orifice to the apex) it is possible to pass an instrument from the mesial to the distal aspect without obstruction. [13] In the semicolon type, (one distinct canal and a buccal or lingual C-shaped canal) whenever an instrument was inserted into any side of the C-shaped canal, it always ends in the distal foramen of the tooth and a file introduced in this canal could probe the whole extension of the C. [51] When negotiating the C-shaped canal, instruments may be clinically centered. [2] Radiographically, the instruments may either converge at the apex or may appear to be exiting the furcation, thus adding to the confusion and troublesome task of determining whether a perforation has occurred. [2],[4],[7],[51]


   Management Top


The high percentage of canal irregularities, such as accessory to lateral canals, and apical delta in a C-shaped canal makes it difficult to clean and seal the entire canal system adequately. [8],[44] The wide fins and small surface area of these canals preclude complete debridement using traditional hand instrumentation techniques, which can lead to failure of root canal therapy. [2] Therefore, careful location and negotiation of the canals and the meticulous mechanical and chemical debridement of the pulp tissue should be carried out in order to successfully treat a C-shaped canal. [15]

Location and negotiation of canals

Modifications in the access cavity designs may be required for teeth with C-shape configuration to facilitate location and negotiation of the complete canal system. [52] When the orifice is continuous C-shape or arc like Mesiobuccal-Distal (MB-D), the number of canals can vary from one to three; when the orifice is oval or flat, the number of canals may be one or two; and when the orifice is round, there is usually only one canal below the orifice. [50] Hence, for continuous C-shape orifice, 3 initial files are inserted, one at either end and one in the middle. When the orifice is oval, two files are inserted, that is, one file at each end of the orifice and when the orifice is round, one initial file is inserted. [53] Calcifications present in the pulp chamber may disguise the C-shape of the canal system. In such cases, several orifices may be probed that link up on further instrumentation. [13] There are also chances of missing out on canals because of bifurcation, dentin fusion, and curvatures. [53] Exploration should be carried out with small size endodontic files, such as a no. 8, 10, 15 K-file with a small, abrupt apically placed curve, to ensure that these irregularities are not missed. [50]

Cleaning and shaping

In order to access all the irregularities in the C-shaped canal system, the orifice portion of the slit can be widened with Gates Glidden drills. [54] However, C1 (continuous C type) and C2 (semicolon type) configurations always have a narrow isthmus and care should be taken to avoid perforation during their preparation. [35] It has been suggested that for such narrow, interconnecting isthmus areas, Gates Glidden drills should not be used and cleaning should be carried out by using a size 25 instrument or smaller. [43],[55] There is a high risk of root perforation at the thinner lingual walls of C-shaped canals during cleaning and shaping. The Abou-Rass et al.,'s anti-curvature filing technique has been recommended to avoid danger zones that are frequently present at mesiolingual walls. [4] However, Jin et al., [15] reported that the tooth structure of the groove area in C-shaped canal was thicker than that of the danger zone of normal second mandibular molar and hence, the C-shaped canals were as safe from strip perforation as other teeth in the limitation of this study. Extreme caution must be taken to prevent strip perforation during cleaning and shaping of C-shaped mandibular premolars, which display thin dentinal walls in the radicular groove area. [27]

Very few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of cleaning procedures in relation to C-shaped root canals [Table 2]. Though nickel-titanium rotary instruments seem to be safe in such canals, further enlargement to an apical dimension greater than size 30 (0.06 taper) is not recommended. [56] After instrumentation by NiTi rotary instruments, K-files or H-files could be passively introduced into the canal, and filling could be specifically directed towards the isthmus areas to obtain better debridement in clinical practice. [57] The recently developed self-adjusting file (SAF) system has been reported to be more efficacious than the protaper system for shaping of C-shaped canals. [58]
Table 2: Studies evaluating the effectiveness of cleaning procedures in C-shaped canals

Click here to view


Because of the large area of canal space, it is doubtful that intracanal instruments can reach and debride the entire portion of the continuum, making irrigation procedures more significant. [7] It is recommended that cleaning of the C-shaped canal system with rotary instruments should be assisted by ultrasonic irrigation. [56] Besides the use of sonication and ultrasonication, the use of chemical agents for disinfection cannot be over emphasized in the treatment of C-shaped root canal system. [57] Some authors have advocated the use of calcium hydroxide as an intracanal medicament for a period of 7-10 days. [51],[54]

With regard to the management of C-shaped canal configuration in mandibular premolars, many complicating factors make them difficult to treat. Anatomically the diameter and width of mandibular first premolar is much smaller than mandibular second molars. The small size of mandibular first premolar limits the coronal access to the complex root canal system, which unlike the mandibular second molar, is found apically. [45]

Obturation

Obtaining a three dimensional fill of a C-shaped canal may prove to be a problem due to the various intricacies present within the root canal system. If a cold condensation technique is adopted for obturation, deeper penetration of condensation instruments in several sites will be necessary. [7] To ensure proper placement of the master cones in C-shaped canals, Barnett [37] recommended placing a large diameter file in the most distal portion of the canal, before seating the master cone in the mesial canal. The file is then withdrawn and the master cone of the distal canal is seated, followed by placement of accessory cones in the middle portion of the C-shaped canal. Studies have shown that following the cleaning and shaping, the remaining dentin thickness around the canals is usually 0.2 to 0.3 mm. The resultant forces of compaction during obturation can exceed the dentin canal resistance, which may result in root fracture and perforation of the root. [49],[54],[55] In this regard, the thermoplasticized gutta-percha technique may prove to be more beneficial. The aim of this technique is to move the gutta-percha and sealer into the root canal system under a hydraulic force. [59] But in C-shaped canals the hydraulic forces can dramatically decrease and can seriously compromise the obturation quality due to the following reasons: (a) there are divergent areas that are frequently unshaped, which may offer resistance to obturating material flow (b) communications exist between the main canals of the C-shape through which the entrapped filling materials that should be captured between the apical tug back area and the level of condensation may pass from one canal to another. Walid's technique [54] aimed to overcome these problems. This technique involves placing the master points simultaneously in the C-shaped canal. A large plugger is placed on one of the seared master points while the other master point is down packed with a smaller plugger. This increases the resistance towards the passage of obturating material from one canal to another. The smaller plugger is then held in place while the other point is down packed. This offers backpressure on entrapped filling materials and enhances the seal. Ordinola- Zapata et al., [60] analyzed gutta-percha filled area of C-shaped canals filled with Maggiore's modified MicroSeal technique with reference to the radiographic features. They found that the apical third was less accurately filled and concluded that C2 canals with a 60° angle could be less difficult to fill than a 120° or 150° C2 canal.

Post endodontic restorations

Post endodontic restoration of teeth with a C-shaped canal configuration may also be compromised due to the relatively small amount of dentin between the external surface of the root and the internal canal system. [2] In the study by Cheung & Cheung, none of the prepared canals had a canal wall greater than 1 mm on the furcal aspect after instrumentation. [56] At least 1 mm of sound tooth structure should be present around a post if needed, for resistance to root fracture. [61] Hence, prefabricated or cast posts increase the risk of creating a strip perforation. [2] Besides, no prefabricated post (circular or conical i.e. of a circular cross section) would fit the C-shaped canals. [54],[56] Since the floor of the pulp chamber is deep it can provide ample retention from the available undercuts. [37],[43] Chamber-retained, bonded amalgam or composite is a better choice as the core or as the final restoration in these teeth. [54],[56]


   Conclusion Top


The C-shaped root canal configuration has an ethnic predilection and a high prevalence rate in mandibular second molars. Understanding the anatomical presentations of this variation will enable the clinician to manage these cases effectively.

 
   References Top

1.Manning SA. Root canal anatomy of mandibular second molars. Part I: Int Endod J 1990;23:34-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Melton DC, Krell KV, Fuller MW. Anatomical and histological features of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars. J Endod 1991;17:384-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Sidow SJ, West LA, Liewehr FR, Loushine RJ. Root canal morphology of human maxillary and mandibular third molars. J Endod 2000;26:675-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Chai WL, Thong YL. Cross-sectional morphology and minimum canal wall widths in C-shaped roots of mandibular molars. J Endod 2004;30:509-12.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Rahimi S, Shahi S, Lotfi M, Zand V, Abdolrahimi M, Es'haghi R. Root canal configuration and the prevalence of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars in an Iranian population. J Oral Sci 2008;50:9-13.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Cooke HG 3rd, Cox FL. C-shapedcanal configurations in mandibular molars. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;99:836-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Weine FS. The C-shaped mandibular second molar: Incidence and other considerations. Members of the Arizona Endodontic Association. J Endod 1998;24:372-5.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Manning SA. Root canal anatomy of mandibular second molars. Part II: C-shaped canals. Int Endod J 1990;23:40-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Yang ZP, Yang SF, Lin YC, Shay JC, Chi CY. C-shaped root canals in mandibular second molars in a Chinese population. Endod Dent Traumatol 1988;4:160-3.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Haddad GY, Nehme WB, Ounsi HF. Diagnosis, classification, and frequency of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars in the Lebanese population. J Endod 1999;25:268-71.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Gulabivala K, Aung TH, Alavi A, Ng YL. Root and canal morphology of Burmese mandibular molars. Int Endod J 2001;34:359-70.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Al-Fouzan KS. C-shaped root canals in mandibular second molars in a Saudi Arabian population. Int Endod J 2002;35:499-504.   Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.Gulabivala K, Opasanon A, Ng YL, Alavi A. Root and canal morphology of Thai mandibular molars. Int Endod J 2002;35:56-62.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Seo MS, Park DS. C-shaped root canals of mandibular second molars in a Korean population: Clinical observation and in vitro analysis. Int Endod J 2004;37:139-44.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Jin GC, Lee SJ, Roh BD. Anatomical study of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars by analysis of computed tomography. J Endod 2006;32:10-3.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Ahmed HA, Abu-bakr NH, Yahia NA, Ibrahim YE. Root and canal morphology of permanent mandibular molars in a Sudanese population. Int Endod J 2007;40:766-71.   Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Peiris R, Takahashi M, Sasaki K, Kanazawa E. Root and canal morphology of permanent mandibular molars in a Sri Lankan population. Odontology 2007;95:16-23.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Peiris HR, Pitakotuwage TN, Takahashi M, Sasaki K, Kanazawa E. Root canal morphology of mandibular permanent molars at different ages. Int Endod J 2008;41:828-35.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Al-Qudah AA, Awawdeh LA. Root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second molar teeth in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J 2009;42:775-84.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV, Ravindranath M. Root and canal morphology of mandibular second molars in an Indian population. J Endod 2010;36:1319-22.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Zhang R, Wang H, Tian YY, Yu X, Hu T, Dummer PM. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate root and canal morphology of mandibular molars in Chinese individuals. Int Endod J 2011;44:990-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Zheng Q, Zhang L, Zhou X, Wang Q, Wang Y, Tang L, et al. C-shaped root canal system in mandibular second molars in a Chinese population evaluated by cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2011;44:857-62.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Wang Y, Guo J, Yang HB, Han X, Yu Y. Incidence of C-shaped root canal systems in mandibular second molars in the native Chinese population by analysis of clinical methods. Int J Oral Sci 2012;4:161-5.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Velmurugan N, Sandhya R. Root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars in an Indian population: A laboratory study. Int Endod J 2009;42:54-8.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Khedmat S, Assadian H, Saravani AA. Root canal morphology of the mandibular first premolar in an Iranian population using cross-sections and radiography. J Endod 2010;36:214-7.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Sandhya R, Velmurugan N, Kandaswamy D. Assessment of root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars in the Indian population using spiral computed tomography: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2010;21:169-73.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
27.Fan B, Ye W, Xie E, Wu H, Gutmann JL. Three-dimensional morphological analysis of C-shaped canals in mandibular first premolars in a Chinese population. Int Endod J 2012;45:1035-41.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Yu X, Guo B, Li KZ, Zhang R, Tian YY, Wang H, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a western Chinese population. BMC Med Imaging 2012;12:18.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Kuzekanani M, Haghani J, Nosrati H. Root and canal morphology of mandibular third molars in an Iranian population. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2012;6:85-8.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Weine FS, Pasiewicz RA, Rice RT. Canal configuration of the mandibular second molar using a clinically oriented in vitro method. J Endod 1988;14:207-13.  Back to cited text no. 30
[PUBMED]    
31.Lambrianidis T, Lyroudia K, Pandelidou O, Nicolaou A. Evaluation of periapical radiographs in the recognition of C-shaped mandibular second molars. Int Endod J 2001;34:458-62.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Jung HJ, Lee SS, Huh KH, Yi WJ, Heo MS, Choi SC. Predicting the configuration of a C-shaped canal system from panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:e37-41.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Baisden MK, Kulild JC, Weller RN. Root canal configuration of the mandibular first premolar. J Endod 1992;18:505-8.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. Root and root canal morphology of the human permanent maxillary first molar: A literature review. J Endod 2006;32:813-21.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.Fan B, Cheung GS, Fan M, Gutmann JL, Fan W. C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars: Part II: Radiographic features. J Endod 2004;30:904-8.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.Orban B, Mueller E. The development of bifurcation of multirooted teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1929;16:297-319.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.Barnett F. Mandibular molars with C-shaped canal. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986;2:79-81.  Back to cited text no. 37
[PUBMED]    
38.Fischlschweiger W, Clausnitzer E. Root formation in molar teeth of the CD-1 mouse. J Endod 1988;14:163-8.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.Carlsen O, Alexandersen V, Heitmann T, Jakobsen P. Root canals in one-rooted maxillary second molars. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100:249-56.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.Singla M, Aggarwal V. C-Shaped palatal canal in maxillary second molar mimicking two palatal canals diagnosed with the aid of spiral computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:e92-5.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.Gu Y. A micro-computed tomographic analysis of maxillary lateral incisors with radicular grooves. J Endod 2011;37:789-92.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.Sabala CL, Benenati FW, Neas BR. Bilateral root or root canal aberrations in a dental school patient population. J Endod 1994;20:38-42.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.Jerome CE. C-shaped root canal system: Diagnosis, treatment and restoration. Gen Dent 1994;42:424-7.  Back to cited text no. 43
[PUBMED]    
44.Cheung GS, Yang J, Fan B. Morphometric study of the apical anatomy of C-shaped root canal systems in mandibular second molars. Int Endod J 2007;40:239-46.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.Lu TY, Yang SF, Pai SF. Complicated root canal morphology of mandibular first premolar in a Chinese population using the cross section method. J Endod 2006;32:932-6.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.Fan B, Yang J, Gutmann JL, Fan M. Root canal systems in mandibular first premolars with C-shaped root configurations. Part I: Microcomputed tomography mapping of the radicular groove and associated root canal cross-sections. J Endod 2008;34:1337-41.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.Fan B, Cheung GS, Fan M, Gutmann JL, Bian Z. C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars: Part I: Anatomical features. J Endod 2004;30:899-903.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.Fan B, Chen WX, Fan MW. Configuration of C-shaped canals in mandibular molars in Chinese population. J Dent Res 2001;80:704.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.Gao Y, Fan B, Cheung GS, Gutmann JL, Fan M. C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars part IV: 3-D morphological analysis and transverse measurement. J Endod 2006;32:1062-5.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.Min Y, Fan B, Cheung GS, Gutmann JL, Fan M. C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars Part III: The morphology of the pulp chamber floor. J Endod 2006;32:1155-9.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.Ricucci D, Pascon EA, Langeland K. Long-term follow-up on C-shaped mandibular molars. J Endod 1996;22:185-7.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.Kottoor J, Velmurugan N, Ballal S, Roy A. Four-rooted maxillary first molar having C-shaped palatal root canal morphology evaluated using cone-beam computerized tomography: A case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;111:e41-5.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.Fan B, Min Y, Lu G, Yang J, Cheung GS, Gutmann JL. Negotiation of C-shaped canal systems in mandibular second molars. J Endod 2009;35:1003-8.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.Walid N. The use of two pluggers for the obturation of an uncommon C-shaped canal. J Endod 2000;26:422-4.  Back to cited text no. 54
[PUBMED]    
55.Jafarzadeh H, Wu YN. The C-shaped root canal configuration: A review. J Endod 2007;33:517-23.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.Cheung LH, Cheung GS. Evaluation of a rotary instrumentation method for C-shaped canals with micro-computed tomography. J Endod 2008;34:1233-8.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.Yin X, Cheung GS, Zhang C, Masuda YM, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K. Micro-computed tomographic comparison of nickel-titanium rotary versus traditional instruments in C-shaped root canal system. J Endod 2010;36:708-12.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.Solomonov M, Paqué F, Fan B, Eilat Y, Berman LH. The challenge of C-shaped canal systems: A comparative study of the self-adjusting file and ProTaper. J Endod 2012;38:209-14.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.Ruddle JC. Three-dimensional obturation of the root canal system. Dent Today 1992;11:28, 30-3, 39.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, de Moraes IG, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, Gutmann JL. Analysis of the gutta-percha filled area in C-shaped mandibular molars obturated with a modified MicroSeal technique. Int Endod J 2009;42:186-97.  Back to cited text no. 60
    
61.Caputo AA, Standlee JP. Pins and posts: Why, when and how. Dent Clin North Am 1976;20:299-311.  Back to cited text no. 61
[PUBMED]    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Marina Fernandes
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Goa Dental College and Hospital, Bambolim - 403 202, Goa
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.136437

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Etiology
   Incidence
   Anatomic features
   Classification
   Diagnosis
   Management
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed11527    
    Printed214    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded868    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal