Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Home About us Editorial Board Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online: 77
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 250-254
Cyclic fatigue resistance of OneShape, Reciproc, and WaveOne: An in vitro comparative study


1 Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences-Section of Dentistry, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
2 Department of Occupational Medicine, Ergonomy and Disability, Laboratory of Nanotechnology, Salvatore Maugeri Foundation IRCCS, Pavia, Italy

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission08-Oct-2013
Date of Decision03-Feb-2014
Date of Acceptance16-Feb-2014
Date of Web Publication2-May-2014
 

   Abstract 

Aims: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the cyclic fatigue resistance of three single-use nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments.
Materials and Methods: Forty files each of OneShape (OS), Reciproc R25 (R25), WaveOne Primary (WO) file, and ProTaper (PT) F2 (as control) were tested in four curved artificial canals with different angles and radii of curvature. The number of cycles to fracture (NCF) was determined and the data were compared for differences by using two-way analysis of variance (P < 0.05).
Results: In general, all single-use instruments were more resistant than traditional rotary instrument used as control. R25 showed the highest cyclic fatigue resistance. One Shape and WO files showed similar cyclic fatigue resistance values, higher than PT F2.
Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that R25 was the most fatigue resistant. OS rotary instruments seem to have good mechanical resistance, similar to NiTi files developed for reciprocating motion.

Keywords: Cyclic fatigue; NiTi; reciprocating motion; rotary files; single-use instruments

How to cite this article:
Dagna A, Poggio C, Beltrami R, Colombo M, Chiesa M, Bianchi S. Cyclic fatigue resistance of OneShape, Reciproc, and WaveOne: An in vitro comparative study. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:250-4

How to cite this URL:
Dagna A, Poggio C, Beltrami R, Colombo M, Chiesa M, Bianchi S. Cyclic fatigue resistance of OneShape, Reciproc, and WaveOne: An in vitro comparative study. J Conserv Dent [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Dec 11];17:250-4. Available from: http://www.jcd.org.in/text.asp?2014/17/3/250/131788

   Introduction Top


Nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments are commonly used for endodontic practice nowadays. [1] They offer many advantages over conventional stainless steel files because they are more flexible and have increased cutting efficiency. [2],[3] The superelasticity of NiTi rotary files allows to produce the desirable tapered root canal form with a reduced tendency to canal transportation. [2],[3],[4] Despite these advantages, NiTi instruments appear to have a high risk of separation, [5],[6] mainly because of fatigue and torsional shear stresses. [7] Torsional fatigue occurs when the tip of the instrument binds in the root canal while the file continues turning. Cyclic fatigue failure is reported to occur unexpectedly without any sign of previous permanent deformation. [8],[9] This happens when the instrument rotates inside a curved root canal and is subjected to an excessive number of tension-compression strain cycles in the region of maximum root canal curvature. [10] Many variables such as the rotational speed, the metal surface treatments, multiple autoclaving, and the metallurgic characterization of the NiTi alloys that could possibly influence the fatigue resistance of NiTi rotary files have been investigated. [11],[12]

Canal curvature is suspected to be the predominant risk factor for instrument failure because of flexural stresses and cyclic fatigue [2],[13],[14] that involve the NiTi core of the files while shaping the root canal walls. Thereby, even if it is possible to try to maintain the original canal configuration and optimal form while shaping, [15] little can be done to prevent or reduce these stresses on the files. [16] In the past years, the reciprocating motion of the NiTi rotary instrument has been shown to decrease the impact of cyclic fatigue compared with rotational motion. [9],[17] Therefore, it has been recently proposed that the single-file shaping technique may simplify instrumentation protocols and avoid the risk of cross-contamination. [16],[17]

Endodontic files in a reciprocating motion along with new alloys and new manufacturing processes have been introduced recently to improve fracture resistance. [11],[18] M-wire is an NiTi alloy prepared by a special thermal process that is claimed to increase flexibility and resistance to cyclic fatigue. [19] Reciprocation was shown to extend the life-span of a NiTi instrument, hence resistance to fatigue, in comparison with continuous rotation. [18],[20] Recently, two M-wire NiTi endodontic file systems were introduced for use in reciprocating motion: Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany) and WaveOne (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). [21] These instruments are single-use files, avoiding metal weakening through prolonged clinical use; however, single-use means that the same instrument can be used in 3-4 root canals, which could be complex and tortuous. [22] The reciprocating working motion consists of a counterclockwise (cutting direction) and a clockwise motion (release of the instrument), whereas the angle of the counterclockwise cutting direction is greater than the angle of the reverse direction. As the counterclockwise angle is greater than the clockwise one, it is claimed that the instrument continuously progresses toward the terminus of the root canal. Reciproc and WaveOne have been evaluated in preliminary studies [7],[17],[21],[22],[23] and the results regarding lifespan, cyclic fatigue resistance, shaping ability, and cleaning efficiency were satisfactory.

A new concept of single-use instrumentation is that a single file is to be used in a full clockwise rotation. OneShape (OS) (Micro Mega, Besancon, France) belongs to this group of single-file systems. This instrument is made of a conventional austenite 55-NiTi alloy. In the tip region, the cross section represents three cutting edges while in the middle of the cross-sectional design progressively changes from a three-cutting-edge design to two cutting edges. At the shank, the S-shaped cross section shows two cutting edges, resembling the cross-sectional design of Reciproc instruments. This design is alleged to eliminate threading and binding of the instrument in continuous rotation. [24]

The purpose of this study is to evaluate in vitro the cyclic fatigue resistance of these single-use Ni-Ti instruments and to compare them with a traditional NiTi instrument (ProTaper (PT) F2). The null hypothesis is that the cyclic fatigue resistance of the different instruments is similar when evaluated in the same canal.


   Materials and methods Top


Grouping

Group 1 (n = 40)

OS (Micro Mega, Besancon, France), constant 0.06 taper, 25-mm length, and tip diameter 25.

Group 2 (n = 40)

Reciproc R25 (R25) (VDW, Munich, Germany), 0.08 taper in the apical part that decreases to the shank, 25-mm length, and tip diameter 25.

Group 3 (n = 40)

WaveOne Primary (WO) (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), 0.08 taper in the apical part that decreases to the shank, 25-mm length, and tip diameter 25.

Group 4 (n = 40)

PT F2 (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) as control, 0.08 taper in the apical part that decreases to the shank, 25-mm length, and tip diameter 25.

Cyclic fatigue testing

According to Castello-Escriva et al., [25] the fatigue testing device consists of four curved stainless steel canals with different angles and radii of curvature, which are stuck on an acrylic surface where the handpiece is also fixed. The four canals are 20 mm in length with a tip of 0.40 mm and 09 taper. Canal 1 has 60° angle and 8-mm radius, canal 2 has 45° angle and 8-mm radius, canal 3 has 60° angle and 5-mm radius, and canal 4 has 45° angle and 5-mm radius.

The diameter of the simulated canals is larger than the instruments, allowing free rotation. To reduce friction as the instruments contacted the metal canal walls, synthetic lubricant oil filled the canal space after each use. Each instrument was used according to manufacturer's instructions. OS was mounted on the Endo Mate DT motor (NSK, Kanuma, Japan) set to 350 rpm and a 4 N/cm torque with a 16:1 contra-angle in clockwise rotation. R25 was mounted on the dedicated reciprocating motor (Silver Reciproc, VDW) used with the manufacturer configuration setup at the preset program "Reciproc ALL" specific to the Reciproc instruments. WO was mounted on the same reciprocating motor (Silver Reciproc, VDW) used with the preset program "WaveOne ALL" specific to the WaveOne instruments. PT F2 was mounted on the Endo Mate DT motor (NSK, Kanuma, Japan) set to 300 rpm and a 2 N/cm torque with a 16:1 contra-angle in clockwise rotation.

Each instrument was allowed to rotate/reciprocate until fracture. The time to fracture was recorded with a 1/100-s chronometer and timing was stopped as fracture is detected visually and/or audibly. The number of cycles to fracture (NCF) was calculated by multiplying the time (seconds) to fracture by the number of rotations or cycles per minute, regardless of the rotation direction. [25] The manufacturers claim that the Reciproc mode has 300 rpm and WaveOne mode has 350 rpm. [22]

Data were analyzed by using two-way analysis of variance in software (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 15.0, Chicago, IL). Post hoc Bonferroni test was applied to identify the groups that were significantly different from others. Statistical significance was set at P-value less than 5%.


   Results Top


The NCF's means for each file in each canal are presented in [Table 1]. The means and the standard deviations for each instrument type in each canal are graphically represented in [Figure 1]. A higher NCF is caused by a higher resistance to cyclic fatigue of the tested instruments. The two-way analysis of variance showed a statistically significant difference among the NCF's means of the instruments when used in the same canal (P < 0.05). Significantly differences between the instruments are presented in [Table 1].
Figure 1: Mean NCF ± standard deviations for each instrument type in each canal. The most diffi cult curvature (canal 1) generated the least NCF in all the instruments compared; the easiest canal (canal 4) showed the highest NCF in all instruments (OS: OneShape, R25: Reciproc R25, WO: WaveOne Primary, PT: Protaper). NCF: Number of cycles to fracture

Click here to view
Table 1: Mean and standard deviation of cyclic fatigue of tested NiTi instruments in each canal

Click here to view


The cyclic fatigue resistance was the highest for R25, followed by OS, WO, and PT in that order. Comparing the results between the canals, R25 had the best fatigue resistance in canals 1, 2, 3, and 4 (P < 0.05). WO and OS had similar cyclic fatigue resistance values in all the canals (P > 0,05): OS exhibited the highest mean in canals 1 and 3, WO in canals 2 and 4, although there was no statistical difference between them. PT exhibited the lowest mean NCF in all the canals (P < 0,05).

The results of the present study showed that the most difficult curvature (canal 1) generated the lowest NCF and the easiest curvature (canal 4) showed the highest NCF values in all systems.


   Discussion Top


The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cyclic fatigue resistance of three new different single-use NiTi instruments in four different artificial canals: Reciproc and WaveOne were designed for use in reciprocating motion, OS for use in continuous rotation.

These new single-use systems have been introduced to shape root canals with only one file: this technique simplification allows saving time and cost for endodontic treatment. [21] However, to shape root canals with only one file, the instrument will be subject to a great deal of stresses, both torsional and cyclic (bending) fatigue. The instrument is not used for further canals and does not require thermal sterilization in autoclave, so it will be not exposed to other stresses. But there are varied reports on autoclaving conditions as to either improving or degrading both the performance and physical properties of different rotary NiTi systems. For example, Sundaram et al., [12] tested cyclic fatigue resistance of NiTi files after autoclaving cycles and concluded that multiple sterilization did not compromise the mechanical behavior of modern rotary NiTi endodontic instruments. Even if autoclaving cycles do not result in deleterious effects that could reduce their mechanical resistance, after multiple usage surface defects like pitting, strip formation, microfractures/microcrack formation, and disruption of cutting edges are evident on the instrument surface and if the instrument is used further, it may result in cyclic fracture. [12]

Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating file systems are made by the same new M-wire NiTi alloy but have different cross sections, S-shape, and concave triangular shape for Reciproc and WaveOne, respectively. [21] It was reported that the larger cross-sectional area (CSA) would have a higher flexural and torsional stiffness, [26] and thus the file design (cross-sectional shape, diameters of core, etc) would have a significant influence on the torsional and bending (hence, fatigue) resistance. [21] Instruments made from M-wire or R-phase NiTi were reported to offer greater flexibility and resistance to cyclic fatigue than the files from traditional alloys. [19],[20],[21],[22] PT F2 had a similar CSA compared with WaveOne [21] but succumbed at a lower NCF and with a lower torsional strength. This might be related to the mechanical characteristics of the NiTi alloy. In addition, PT F2 has a greater number of spiraling flutes (i.e. smaller pitch) than the other brands. This would have the effect of increasing the stiffness along the shaft and, consequently, resulting in a lower value of torsional strength. [26]

Kim et al., [21] assessed the cyclic fatigue resistance and torsional resistance of two reciprocating motion systems, R25 and WO file, compared with PT F2 in a continuous rotation. Both reciprocating files demonstrated higher cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance than PT. They observed higher cyclic fatigue but lower torsional resistance in Reciproc than WaveOne. It implies that R25 possesses lower flexural stiffness and smaller polar moment of inertia than WaveOne. In other words, WaveOne had a higher torsional stiffness than Reciproc.

No studies about cyclic fatigue of OS are available. A reciprocating motion may decrease the impact of cyclic fatigue on NiTi rotary instrument life compared with rotational motion. [25] But Oh et al., [27] verified that the instrument design, particularly the CSA, can also affect the fatigue behavior when subjected to torsion or bending. Sections with a larger CSA are more susceptible to fatigue fracture than smaller sections when rotating at the same curvature. Moreover, an electro-polishing procedure has been attempted during the manufacturing process to reduce the number of machining defects and residual stress of ground NiTi rotary instruments: [27] the grinding of file blanks during the manufacture of NiTi rotary instruments causes many machining defects. This procedure removes the outer layer of a metal, leaving the surface free of contaminants, microcracks, and work-induced residual stress. This means that the resistance to fatigue failure can be enhanced by a smooth defect-free surface. [25]

In the present study, R25 exhibited significantly higher cyclic fatigue resistance than other instruments in all canals, probably because of the NiTi alloy, its geometry, and the reciprocating movement. But all single-use NiTi files were more resistant than traditional rotary instrument used as control. The results obtained for PT were comparable with the previous studies conducted under similar experimental conditions. [21],[25] OS showed better results than PT F2: it is made by the same conventional austenite 55-NiTi alloy, but the design is really different. OS is characterized by different cross-sectional designs over the entire length of the working part and its design is alleged to guarantee more flexibility. [24] So, within the limitations of this study, OS instruments showed cyclic fatigue resistance similar to WaveOne used in reciprocating motion, much higher than PT F2. Variable cross section with small residual core and electro-polished surfaces of OS could explain these good results.


   Conclusion Top


Within the limitation of this study, it can be concluded that single-use instruments were the most fatigue resistant compared with a conventional instrument. R25, exhibited the better results, but OS showed good mechanical resistance, even if it is developed for use in continuous rotation.

 
   References Top

1.Torabinejad M, Walton RE. Endodontics: Principles and Practice. 4 th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Saunders Elsevier; 2009.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: A review. J Endod 2004;30:559-67.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Schafer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: A clinical study. J Endod 2004;30:432-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Chen JL, Messer HH. A comparison of stainless steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique. Aust Dent J 2002;47:12-20.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Arens FC, Hoen MM, Steiman HR, Dietz GC Jr. Evaluation of single-use rotary nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2003;29:664-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000;26:161-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Berutti E, Paolino DS, Chiandussi G, Alovisi M, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, Pasqualini D. Root canal anatomy preservation of WaveOne reciprocating files with or without glide path. J Endod 2012;38:101-4.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Peters OA, Barbakow F. Dynamic torque and apical forces of ProFile 0.04 rotary instruments during preparation of curved canals. Int Endod J 2002;35:379-89.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Varela-Patino P, Ibanez-Parraga A, Rivas-Mundina B, Cantatore G, Otero XL, Martin-Biedma B. Alternating versus continuous rotation: A comparative study of the effect on instrument life. J Endod 2010;36:157-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Lopes HP, Moreira EJ, Elias CN, de Almeida RA, Neves MS. Cyclic fatigue of ProTaper instruments. J Endod 2007;33:55-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Gambarini G, Grande NM, Plotino G, Somma F, Garala M, De Luca M, Testarelli L. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods. J Endod 2008;34:1003-5.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Sundaram KM, Ebenezar RA, Ghani MF, Martina L, Narayanan A, Mony B. Comparative evaluation of the effects of multiple autoclaving on cyclic fatigue resistance of three different rotary Ni-Ti instruments: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2013;16:323-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
13.Hulsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PM. Mechanical preparation of root canals: Shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Top 2005;10:30-76.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Peters OA, Peters CI, Schonenberger K, Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: Assessment of torque and force in relation to canal anatomy. Int Endod J 2003;36:93-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Arora A, Taneja S, Kumar M. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of different rotary NiTi instruments in curved canals using CBCT. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:35-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
16.Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Paolino DS, Scotti N, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, et al. Canal shaping with WaveOne reciprocating files and Pro Taper system: A comparative study. J Endod 2012;38:505-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.De-Deus G, Moreira EJ, Lopes HP, Elias CN. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement. Int Endod J 2010;43:1063-8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Franco V, Fabiani C, Taschieri S, Malentacca A, Bortolin M, Del Fabbro M. Investigation on the shaping ability of nickel-titanium files when used with a reciprocating motion. J Endod 2011;37:1398-401.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Al-Hadlaq SM, Aljarbou FA, AlThumairy RI. Evaluation of cyclic flexural fatigue of M-wire nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2010;36:305-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.You SY, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY, Shon WJ, Lee W. Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals. J Endod 2010;36:1991-4.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Kim HC, Kwak SW, Cheung GS, Ko DH, Chung SM, Lee W. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod 2012;38:541-4.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Plotino G, Grande NM, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. Int Endod J 2012;45:614-8.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Kim HC, Hwang YJ, Jung DW, You SY, Kim HC, Lee W. Micro-computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy comparisons of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments used with reciprocating motion. Scanning 2013;35:112-8.  Back to cited text no. 23
[PUBMED]    
24.Burklein S, Hiller C, Huda M, Schafer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of Mtwo versus coated and uncoated EasyShape instruments in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J 2011;44:447-57.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Castello-Escrivà R, Alegre-Domingo T, Faus-Matoses V, Roman-Richon S, Faus-Llacer VJ. In vitro comparison o cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper. WaveOne, and Twisted Files. J Endod 2012;38:1521-4.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Baek SH, Lee CJ, Versluis A, Kim BM, Lee W, Kim HC. Comparison of torsional stiffness of nickel-titanium rotary files with different geometric characteristics. J Endod 2011;37:1283-6.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Oh SR, Chang SW, Lee Y, Gu Y, Son WJ, Lee W, et al. A comparison of nickel-titanium rotary instruments manufactured using different methods and cross-sectional areas: Ability to resist cyclic fatigue. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Endod 2010;109:622-8.  Back to cited text no. 27
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Claudio Poggio
Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences - Section of Dentistry, Policlinico "San Matteo", Piazzale Golgi 3, 27100 Pavia
Italy
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.131788

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3276    
    Printed88    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded268    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal