Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Home About us Editorial Board Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online: 622
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 138-141
Comparative evaluation of the canal curvature modifications after instrumentation with One Shape rotary and Wave One reciprocating files


1 Departments of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, D.J College of Dental Sciences & Research, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Departments of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, I.T.S. Dental College, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission30-Sep-2013
Date of Decision10-Dec-2013
Date of Acceptance23-Dec-2013
Date of Web Publication1-Mar-2014
 

   Abstract 

Aims: This study compared the canal curvature modifications after instrumentation with One Shape (Micro Mega) rotary file and Wave One primary reciprocating file (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland).
Materials and Methods: Thirty International Organization for Standardization 15, 0.02 taper, Endo Training Blocks (Dentsply Maillefer) were used. In all specimens working length (WL) was established at the reference point 0. Glide path was achieved with Path-File 1, 2 and 3 (Dentsply Maillefer) at the WL. Group 1 were shaped with One Shape file and group 2 with Wave One files. Pre and post-digital images were superimposed, processed with Corel draw Graphic Suite X5 (Corel Corporation, Ottawa, Canada), Adobe Photoshop CS3 (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA) and Solid works student Edition software (Dassault Systems Solid Works Corp, S.A., Velizy, France).
Statistical Analysis: It was done with mean, standard deviation, one-way ANOVA, (P < 0.05) t-test and Karl Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Results: Mean was more for Wave One compared with One Shape. One-way ANOVA and t-test showed a significant difference between One Shape and Wave One at 5% level of significance (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Canals prepared with Wave One file preserved canal shape, respected the anatomical shape of J-shaped canal and produced a continuously tapered funnel.

Keywords: Canal shaping; One Shape; reciprocating motion; Wave One

How to cite this article:
Dhingra A, Kochar R, Banerjee S, Srivastava P. Comparative evaluation of the canal curvature modifications after instrumentation with One Shape rotary and Wave One reciprocating files. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:138-41

How to cite this URL:
Dhingra A, Kochar R, Banerjee S, Srivastava P. Comparative evaluation of the canal curvature modifications after instrumentation with One Shape rotary and Wave One reciprocating files. J Conserv Dent [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Jul 21];17:138-41. Available from: http://www.jcd.org.in/text.asp?2014/17/2/138/128049

   Introduction Top


Root canal shaping is one of the most important steps in canal treatment. [1] It is essential in determining the efficacy of all subsequent procedures, including chemical disinfection and root canal obturation. [2] This "ideal" preparation can be a difficult task to achieve in severely curved root canals or S-shaped canals, especially with traditional stainless steel hand instruments. [3],[4] Nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments have been marked as a way to overcome these shortcomings. NiTi-alloy has the advantages of super elasticity and the shape memory effect, [5] which can maintain the original canal curvature and create a tapered root canal shape. Root canal working length (WL) may be defined as the distance from a coronal reference point to the point of which canal preparation and obturation should terminate. Success has been found to be greatest in teeth in which the obturation material extended to within 2 mm of the radiographic apex but did not extend beyond the radiographic apex. [6]

Canal curvature is suspected to be the predominant risk factor for instrument failure because of flexural stresses and cyclic fatigue. [1],[2],[7] The clinician can do very little to prevent or reduce such stresses. The reciprocating motion of the NiTi rotary instrument has been shown to decrease the impact of cyclic fatigue compared with rotational motion. [8],[9],[10] Therefore, it has been recently proposed that the single-file shaping technique may simplify instrumentation protocols and avoid the risk of cross contamination. Moreover, the use of only one NiTi instrument is more cost-effective and the learning curve is considerably reduced. [10]

Now-a-days simplifying endodontic procedures with complete safety and effectiveness is our primary concern. Micro-Mega now offers One Shape, the one and only NiTi instrument in continuous rotation for quality root canal preparations. One Shape allows for curved canal negotiation with an instrumental and easy dynamic. Its non-working (safety) tip ensures an effective apical progression avoiding obstructions which are often preceded by instrument separation. Quality root canal shaping can be achieved with one single instrument with remarkable design. A root canal treatment is approximately 4 times faster than a conventional treatment with One Shape file. Overall duration of treatment is shortened. Simplification of the endodontic instrument sequence is possible.

The new Wave One NiTi single-file system has been recently introduced by Dentsply Maillefer (Ballaigues, Switzerland). [11] The system is designed to be used with a dedicated reciprocating motion motor. It consists of 3 single-use files: Small (International Organization for Standardization [ISO] 21 tip and 6% taper) for fine canals, primary (ISO 25 tip and 8% taper) for the majority of canals and large (ISO 40 and 8% taper) for large canals. The files are manufactured with M-Wire (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) NiTi alloy. [12]

The purpose of this study was to compare the canal curvature modification of the Wave One Primary file with One Shape file system.


   Materials and Methods Top


Thirty ISO 15, 0.02 taper, J shaped Endo Training Blocks (Dentsply Maillefer) were used. The canal in the blocks were marked from 0 to 11 at an interval of 1 mm taking 0 as the termination/reference point for the WL. Each simulated canal was colored with Indian ink injected with a syringe. Each specimen was mounted on a stable support consisting of a rectangular slot the size of the specimen (30 mm × 10 mm) and a support for a digital camera (Nikon D70; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) positioned centrally and at 900 to the specimen. Digital images of all specimens before instrumentation were obtained and saved as JPEG files. Specimens were then randomly assigned to 2 different groups (n = 15 each). WL was established in the canals until reference point 0 with a #10-K file (Dentsply Maillefer).

In group 1, the glide path was created with PathFile 1, 2 and 3 (Dentsply Maillefer) at the full WL until reference point 0 using Glyde (Dentsply Maillefer) as the lubricating agent. Each canal was shaped using OneShape rotary file till the WL (reference point 0) with the X-Smart Plus motor (Micro mega) set to 350 rpm and a 5-Ncm torque with a 16:1 contraangle. Canal patency was checked with a #10 K-file (Dentsply Maillefer) before the glide path, after the glidepath, before using OneShape rotary file and after OneShape rotary file.

In group 2, the glidepath was created with PathFile 1, 2 and 3 at the full WL till reference point 0 by using Glyde as the lubricating agent. Canals were shaped with Wave One Primary reciprocating files using a pecking motion till WL.

The reciprocating motor X-Smart Plus (Dentsply Maillefer) of the Wave One file was used with the manufacturer configuration setup. Canal patency was checked with a #10 K file (Dentsply Maillefer) before the glidepath, after the glidepath and before using WaveOne Primary and after shaping with WaveOne Primary.

New instruments were used in each specimen. After instrumentation, all specimens in each group were repositioned in the slot and photographed as described previously. By using digital imaging software Corel draw Graphic Suite X5 (Corel Corporation, Ottawa, Canada), Adobe Photoshop CS3 (Adobe Systems Inc. San Jose, CA) and Solid works student Edition software (Dassault Systems Solid Works Corp, S.A., Velizy, France) the pre and post-instrumentation images were processed and superimposed.

The processing of the images was done in the following steps:

Step 1 - Alignment and auto color: Alignment of the axis of blocks done with reference to the scales in the toolbox of Corel draw Graphic Suite X5 (Corel Corporation, Ottawa, Canada). Then, auto color is performed which is an image correction tool which provides better visibility and maintains the color gamut difference per pixel.

Step 2 - Inversion of images: One image is set to inversion mode to differentiate the properties of both images from each other while overlapping using Adobe Photoshop CS3 (Adobe Systems Inc. San Jose, CA).

Step 3 - Orbit shifting and superimposition with respect to the reference line: Superimposition is the placement of an image on top of an already-existing image (inversion mode) to add to the overall image effect. During the development of images, a reference measurement was undertaken into consideration for the experimental analysis based on the perpectual analysis with respect to the reference line. This is known as orbit shifting.

Step 4 - Degree of angle of curvature-One shape: Two reference points were assumed to precisely calculate the angle of curvature. Two intersection points were defined for OneShape and the angles for the same were calculated via solid works student Edition software (Dassault Systems Solid Works Corp, S.A., Velizy, France). The Angular calculation was based on the principle of geometry. Furthermore, the angles were confirmed using the trigonometric formulas for each block.

Step 5 - Degree of angle of curvature-Wave One: This is calculated in a similar manner as step 4.

Pre and post-digital images were superimposed, processed with Corel draw Graphic Suite X5 (Corel Corporation, Ottawa, Canada), Adobe Photoshop CS3 (Adobe Systems Inc. San Jose, CA) and solid works student Edition software (Dassault Systems Solid Works Corp, S.A., Velizy, France). Statistical analysis was performed with mean, standard deviation, one way ANOVA, (P < 0.05) t-test and Karl Pearson's correlation coefficient.


   Results Top


Mean for the angle of curvature was more for wave-one when compared to OneShape. Mean value for WaveOne was 62.227 when compared with 61.68 for OneShape. Standard deviation for WaveOne was 0.5922 and for OneShape 0.8273 respectively [Table 1].
Table 1: Comparison between one shape and wave one


Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of 2 NiTi instruments, the WaveOne primary and OneShape, in canal curvature modification after instrumentation. In the present study, simulated canals were chosen to standardize the conditions. Much care should be taken in the extrapolation of the results to the use of real roots due to the difference between resin and dentin. [13],[14] In this study, geometric variations of canal curvature in the middle plane of standardized resin blocks were analyzed through a 2-dimensional photographic method. Simulated root canals have been widely used to allow a direct analysis of post instrumentation changes in canal curvature and thus to evaluate the tendency of these techniques to maintain the original canal anatomy under standardized conditions. [15]

Ni-Ti alloys have been found to be 2-3 times more elastic than similarly manufactured stainless steel files. This property may allow Ni-Ti files to negotiate curved canals with less lateral stress but do not allow the precurving of Ni-Ti files. Whether the physical tendency of Ni-Ti files to remain straight, prevents ideal instrumentation or whether their high flexibility allows a better negotiation of curved canals despite the inability to precurve, still remains questionable. [16]

Previous studies have shown that preserving the original canal shape with a less invasive approach minimizes the risk of canal transportation with a subsequently lower incidence of canal curvature straightening, the formation of ledges and irregular apical enlargement. [17],[18] The prevention of apical transportation and irregular foramen widening may also lead to a well-sealed root filling with less extrusion of debris and reduced post-operative discomfort. [19],[20],[21] Preservation of the original canal shape and the lack of canal aberrations are associated with increased antimicrobial and sealing efficiency [22] and reduced weakening of the tooth structure. Besides canal anatomy, other factors contribute to optimal mechanical instrumentation outcomes, such as instrument design, instrumentation sequence, rotational speed, operator's experience and the use of irrigants. [1],[23] Recently, a new WaveOne NiTi single-file reciprocating system has been introduced to simplify root canal preparation. Only one single shaping file is required to provide the canal with an adequate size and taper. The main characteristics of this system are single use, a reciprocating action and M-Wire technology alloy manufacturing.

Even more recently, One Shape file has been introduced in which complete canal shaping is possible with only one single file in continuous rotation. The main advantages of this file are unique, sterile, economic and innovative. As a result of clinical use and extensive publication, continuous rotation is a principle known and recognized for almost 20 years. The advantages of the reciprocating motion are based on the physics law of action and reaction applied to root canal instrumentation, which results in a balanced force, as theorized by Roane et al. [24] The reciprocating movement minimizes torsional and flexural stresses, increases the canal centering ability and reduces the taper lock within the number of instrument cycles within the root canal. Recent studies showed that an alternating rotary movement is a valid option to optimize endodontic instrumentation by reducing the risk of instrument fracture and root canal deformity. [8] The use of the reciprocating motion instead of the continuous rotation method could be advantageous in terms of stresses and the time required for the preparation of curved root canals with a single use of a NiTi file. [10] In our study, the single-file technique used with the reciprocating motion enhanced the canal centering ability, leading to less invasive root canal preparation. Deviation from the original curvature can lead to excessive or inappropriate dentine removal, straightening of the canal and creation of a ledge in the dentinal wall, a biomechanical defect known as elbow, which forms the coronal to the elliptical-shaped apical seal, canals with hourglass appearance in cross-section, which requires stripping and over-preparation that weakens the tooth, resulting in fracture of the root.

The single use of endodontic instruments was recently recommended to decrease instrument fatigue and possible cross contamination, reducing the number of NiTi rotary instruments required for canal preparation. The single-file technique was also suggested as being cost-effective. The WaveOne technique is both a single-file and single-use concept. As stated, it is a single-file concept given that one single file is able to transition a secured canal to a well-shaped canal, in most instances. Further, appreciate that a single WaveOne file is frequently used to prepare multiple canals in a single furcated tooth, performing a significant amount of work. The WaveOne concept must be considered a single-use concept due to the obvious stress and wear on the active portion of the file. In conclusion, within the limits of this study, the new WaveOne NiTi Primary reciprocating single-file better maintained the original canal anatomy, with less modification of the canal curvature compared with OneShape continuous rotation file. Further investigations are needed to understand whether the better performance of the instrument may be attributed to the reciprocating motion, the variable section design, the Wire alloy or the reverse cutting blades, or a combination of these variables. [25]

 
   References Top

1.Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: A review. J Endod 2004;30:559-67.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Hulsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PM. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Top 2005;10:30-76.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Yun HH, Kim SK. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:228-33.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Schäfer E, Florek H. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 2003;36:199-207.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Walia HM, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 1988;14:346-51.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Khurana P, Nainan MT, Sodhi KK, Padda BK. Change of working length in curved molar root canals after preparation with different rotary nickel-titanium instruments. J Conserv Dent 2011;14:264-8.   Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
7.Peters OA, Peters CI, Schönenberger K, Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: Assessment of torque and force in relation to canal anatomy. Int Endod J 2003;36:93-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.You SY, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY, Shon WJ, Lee W. Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals. J Endod 2010;36:1991-4.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Varela-Patiño P, Ibañez-Párraga A, Rivas-Mundiña B, Cantatore G, Otero XL, Martin-Biedma B. Alternating versus continuous rotation: A comparative study of the effect on instrument life. J Endod 2010;36:157-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.De-Deus G, Moreira EJ, Lopes HP, Elias CN. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement. Int Endod J 2010;43:1063-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Webber J, Machtou P, Pertot W, Kuttler S, Ruddle C, West J. The wave one single-file reciprocating system. Roots 2011;1:28-33.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S, Namerow K. Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of ProFile 25/.04 rotary instruments. J Endod 2008;34:1406-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Yoshimine Y, Ono M, Akamine A. The shaping effects of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals. J Endod 2005;31:373-5.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Ozgur Uyanik M, Cehreli ZC, Ozgen Mocan B, Tasman Dagli F. Comparative evaluation of three nickel-titanium instrumentation systems in human teeth using computed tomography. J Endod 2006;32:668-71.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Merrett SJ, Bryant ST, Dummer PM. Comparison of the shaping ability of race and flexmaster rotary nickel-titanium systems in simulated canals. J Endod 2006;32:960-2.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N, Porkodi I, Pradeep G. Canal-centering ability: An endodontic challenge. J Conserv Dent 2009;12:3-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
17.Loizides AL, Kakavetsos VD, Tzanetakis GN, Kontakiotis EG, Eliades G. A comparative study of the effects of two nickel-titanium preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by microcomputed tomography. J Endod 2007;33:1455-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV. Ledge formation: Review of a great challenge in endodontics. J Endod 2007;33:1155-62.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Pak JG, White SN. Pain prevalence and severity before, during, and after root canal treatment: A systematic review. J Endod 2011;37:429-38.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Favieri A, Machado AG, Gahyva SM, Oliveira JC, et al. Incidence of postoperative pain after intracanal procedures based on an antimicrobial strategy. J Endod 2002;28:457-60.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Wu MK, Fan B, Wesselink PR. Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part I: Effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings. J Endod 2000;26:210-6.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Moore J, Fitz-Walter P, Parashos P. A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of apical root canal preparation using three instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J 2009;42:1057-64.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Karabucak B, Gatan AJ, Hsiao C, Iqbal MK. A comparison of apical transportation and length control between EndoSequence and Guidance rotary instruments. J Endod 2010;36:123-5.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson MG Jr. The "balanced force" concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 1985;11:203-11.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]    
25.Maitin N, Arunagiri D, Brave D, Maitin SN, Kaushik S, Roy S. An ex vivo comparative analysis on shaping ability of four NiTi rotary endodontic instruments using spiral computed tomography. J Conserv Dent 2013;16:219-23.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  

Top
Correspondence Address:
Anil Dhingra
B-3, New Multan Nagar, New Delhi - 110 056
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.128049

Rights and Permissions



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2966    
    Printed50    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded312    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal