Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Home About us Editorial Board Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online: 1214
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 124-128
Cut off values of laser fluorescence for different storage methods at different time intervals in comparison to frozen condition: A 1 year in vitro study


1 Departments of Conservative & Endodontics, Institute of Dental Sciences, Jammu and Kashmir, India
2 Departments of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Government Dental College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
3 Departments of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Government Dental College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
4 Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
5 Departments of Conservative & Endodontics, Government Dental College, Jammu and Kashmir, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission17-Oct-2013
Date of Decision04-Dec-2013
Date of Acceptance18-Dec-2014
Date of Web Publication1-Mar-2014
 

   Abstract 

Aims: The aim of the following study is to evaluate the change in laser fluorescence (LF) values for extracted teeth stored in different solutions over 1 year period, to give cut-off values for different storage media at different time intervals to get them at par with the in vivo conditions and to see which medium gives best results with the least change in LF values and while enhancing the validity of DIAGNOdent in research.
Materials and Methods: Ninety extracted teeth selected, from a pool of frozen teeth, were divided into nine groups of 10 each. Specimens in Groups 1-8 were stored in 1% chloramine, 10% formalin, 10% buffered formalin, 0.02% thymol, 0.12% chlorhexidine, 3% sodium hypochlorite, a commercially available saliva substitute-Wet Mouth (ICPA Pharmaceuticals) and normal saline respectively at 4°C. The last group was stored under frozen condition at −20°C without contact with any storage solution. DIAGNOdent was used to measure the change the LF values at day 30, 45, 60, 160 and 365.
Statistical Analysis Used: The mean change in LF values in different storage mediums at different time intervals were compared using two-way ANOVA.
Results: At the end of 1 year, significant decrease in fluorescence (P < 0.05) was observed in Groups 1-8. Maximum drop in LF values occurred between day 1 and 30. Group 9 (frozen specimens) did not significantly change their fluorescence response.
Conclusions: An inevitable change in LF takes place due to various storage media commonly used in dental research at different time intervals. The values obtained from our study can remove the bias caused by the storage media and the values of LF thus obtained can hence be conveniently extrapolated to the in vivo condition.

Keywords: DIAGNOdent; laser fluorescence; storage methods

How to cite this article:
Kaul R, Kaul V, Farooq R, Wazir ND, Khateeb SU, Malik AH, Masoodi AA. Cut off values of laser fluorescence for different storage methods at different time intervals in comparison to frozen condition: A 1 year in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:124-8

How to cite this URL:
Kaul R, Kaul V, Farooq R, Wazir ND, Khateeb SU, Malik AH, Masoodi AA. Cut off values of laser fluorescence for different storage methods at different time intervals in comparison to frozen condition: A 1 year in vitro study. J Conserv Dent [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Oct 22];17:124-8. Available from: http://www.jcd.org.in/text.asp?2014/17/2/124/128043

   Introduction Top


The origin of the fluorescence is not fully clear, [1],[2] though it seems unlikely that apatite is responsible for the basal values associated with healthy enamel. [3] The explanation may be the result of the combination of the inorganic matrix with the absorption of organic molecules. [4] Carious lesions fluoresce more strongly than healthy tissues at an excitation wavelength in the red and infrared part of the spectrum. [3],[5] This increase in observed fluorescence is related to two processes: Demineralization of the tooth and bacteria with their metabolic products (porphyrins). [1],[2] Most of the fluorescence is induced by the organic components, [2],[3],[6] rather than by crystal disintegration and transmission through scantly homogeneous enamel. [7] This hypothesis is based on the fact that laser fluorescence (LF) does not detect lesions caused in the laboratory with acids instead of bacterial activity. [1] Bacteria responsible for caries would produce certain endogenous porphyrins (fluorophores) that fluoresce when excited by red laser light. [8]

The LF-based device for caries diagnosis is equipped with a laser diode providing the excitation light source, wavelength 655 nm, necessary for detection of these fluorophores.

Most studies evaluating LF have been carried out in vitro, [2],[3],[9],[10],[11] though there are also a number of in vivo studies. [12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17] The results of in vitro studies cannot be extrapolated to in vivo conditions and the limitations of these studies are well-known. In order to get the maximal sensitivities and specificities from the LF device and to obtain an appropriate guideline for the practitioner to interpret the results, several cut-off values were presented, [18] thus making the diagnostic decision even more difficult. In many cases, the cut-off values determined in vitro proved to be lesser than the cut-off values obtained from clinical studies. [15],[19],[20],[21],[22] This may be due to the way in which the teeth are preserved, or changes in their organic content after extraction, inducing alterations in dental tissue fluorescence. The mentioned organic matrix begins to degrade with time. These could promote variations in the optical properties of the teeth [23] and consequently in their LF response.

Teeth being the most essential part of the dental research methodologies invariably need to be stored under proper conditions in order for various in vitro studies to be carried out authentically. Tooth storage conditions in studies are yet to be standardized. There is a need to clarify the effect of different storage media on the fluorescence readings during a specified span of time. Hence, the prime objective of this investigation was to evaluate the change in LF for teeth stored in different storage solutions as a function of time and to give cut-off values for different storage media at different time intervals to get them at par with the clinical/in vitro conditions and to see which medium gives best results with the least change in LF values and while enhancing the validity of DIAGNOdent in research.


   Materials and Methods Top


Sample selection

Extracted teeth were collected and subjected to an autoclave cycle for 40 min as per the guidelines of Centers for Disease Control, USA based on the study by Pantera and Schuster. [24] Initially, all the teeth were frozen and stored at −20°C immediately after extraction and had no contact with any storage solution for 7 days. Following this, the teeth were then defrosted to room temperature over a period of 14 h placing them in plastic containers. Nearly 100% humidity was insured by placing a wet blotting paper at the bottom of each container making sure that no contact was made between the teeth and the blotting paper. All teeth were then cleaned with a toothbrush under tap water for 15 s. Only the teeth with an LF ≥30, indicative of requiring definitive restorative procedures, [18] were used. 90 extracted teeth were selected from this pool and a specific site was selected and recorded for measurement. Each specimen had a mean fluorescence value of 92 varying from 85 to 96.

Individual storage of teeth

All 90 samples were then divided randomly into 9 groups of 10 teeth each. Measurements were made for each tooth after which the samples were stored as follows: Group 1 in 1% chloramine, Group 2 in 10% formalin, Group 3 in 10% buffered formalin, Group 4 in 0.02% thymol, Group 5 in 0.12% chlorhexidine, Group 6 in 3% sodium hypochlorite, Group 7 in a commercially available saliva substitute-Wet Mouth (ICPA Pharmaceuticals) and Group 8 in normal saline. The storage temperature was 4°C for these 8 groups. Group 9 was stored without any storage solution at −20°C.

Measurements with LF

LF measurements were performed with the same LF-based device-DIAGNOdent (Kavo, Biberach, Germany) throughout the study.

Prior to each measurement, the LF device was calibrated according to the manufacturer's instructions. Measurements were repeated at 30, 45, 60, 160 and 365 days. In order to repeat the readings at the same site each time, an indentation was marked near the site on the teeth with a round bur [Table 1], [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Laser fluorescence values for Groups 1-9 over t30, t45, t60, t160 and t365

Click here to view
Table 1: Laser fluorescence values of groups at different time intervals


Click here to view


Before each measurement, all teeth were defrosted to room temperature for 14 h. Group 9 (frozen teeth) were kept at 100% humidity while the other groups were kept in their respective storage solutions following which they were rinsed under tap water for 3 min to remove residual solution before carrying out measurements. After measurement, Groups 1-8 was placed in fresh solutions while Group 9 was frozen at −20°C again. All specimens were placed in darkness.

Data analysis

In order to allow comparisons between individual LF measurements with time, the baseline was set at 0.00 and curves were plotted [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Change in laser fluorescence values plotted as a function of time

Click here to view


The mean change in LF values for the eight storage media and frozen condition was calculated. Average change at different time intervals were used as cut-off values as compared to the in vitro condition. Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows®],[ version 20. Statistical significance was set at P = 0.05. The mean change in LF values in different storage mediums at different time intervals were compared using two-way ANOVA.


   Results Top


In all specimens the difference was statistically significant for all groups except for the frozen specimens. All curves dropped dramatically immediately after a storage in solutions in Groups 1-8. Maximum drop occurred between days 1 and 30 after which the drop was gradual. The change in LF values at 30 days as a percentage of total change was evaluated and presented in the form of a bar diagram [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Change in laser fluorescence values at 30 days as a percentage of total change

Click here to view


It was discerned that specimens stored in Wet Mouth, sodium hypochlorite, chloramine and normal saline exhibited a slower initial decline in LF values (up to day 30) as compared to formalin, buffered formalin, thymol and chlorhexidine.

Therefore, it can be clearly discerned from [Figure 2] and [Figure 3] that for short-term storage purposes-Wet Mouth, sodium hypochlorite, chloramines or normal saline should be preferred while for studies requiring long-term storage of teeth as specimens-formalin, buffered formalin, thymol or chlorhexidine should be preferred. However, the best storage condition would undoubtedly be the frozen condition which showed a statistically insignificant change (P > 0.05) in LF values over the entire period of the study.


   Discussion Top


Most of the research studies carried out in dentistry are first evaluated under laboratory or in vitro conditions and only after a hypothesis is tested under these conditions, is the methodology extrapolated onto the clinical or in vivo condition. Various factors such as room temperature, humidity and storage media need to be considered when working under laboratory conditions.

In the in vitro condition, the variable hypothesized to affect differences in cut-off values in different studies [15],[19],[20],[21],[22] has been the storage solutions. Most of the storage solutions, used in dental research for preservation of extracted teeth, are antiseptics or disinfectants which are basically a "protoplasmic poison" for the bacteria. This probably leads to decrease in the concentration of fluorophores in the specimen by dilution ultimately leading to a reduction in the LF signal. Moreover, the chemicals used might even cause a modification of the fluorophores or affect the optical properties of dental hard tissues like dispersion and scattering over time. On the other hand, freezing is known to exert a bacteriostatic effect, as this is commonly used for preservation of bacterial cultures. [25] Furthermore, it is highly unlikely that bacteria or their endogenous products (fluorophores) will undergo a change if no solution is in contact with them, such as in the frozen condition.

Very few studies have dealt with the issue of effect of storage on LF response. In a study [23] spectroscopic changes in human dentine exposed to various storage solutions were measured in the ultraviolet, visible and near-infra-red spectral ranges with an integrating sphere spectrophotometer over a 28 day period. It was concluded that changes in surface chemistry and optical properties of dentine did occur as a function of storage solution and time, which must be considered when studying dentine. Another study [20] had a conflicting finding of increase in fluorescence after formalin fixation. However, in that experiment, the specimens had been stored in thymol saturated saline followed by subsequent storage in neutral-buffered formalin unlike our study where no prior contact was made with any other solution. Hence, the two studies cannot be compared. Few other studies [25],[26],[27] have been conducted in the recent past which concluded that a decrease in LF values takes place when teeth are stored in different storage solutions as functions of time which is in concurrence with our findings.

Our study evaluated a change in LF values for eight different storage solutions in comparison with the frozen condition which has not been previously conducted. In our study, a temporal relationship has been established in the drop in LF values wherein the maximum drop was seen during the first 30 days of storage following which the drop in the readings was found to be gradual. The observed drop in the LF values was significant for each of the eight solutions while it remained insignificant for the frozen condition, which is in agreement with the previous studies of Lussi et al. [11] Since there was little or no change in the LF values for the frozen teeth, hence it may not be wrong to assume that the frozen condition may be comparable to the in vivo condition thus enabling the practitioner to interpret results and extrapolate them with more accuracy to the clinical condition.

The study validates use of DIAGNOdent as a reliable evaluating measure in various researches being conducted globally in the field of dentistry. Recently, many researches have been conducted, utilizing DIAGNOdent as a primary tool for studying mineralization of dental specimens. [28],[29],[30]

It is our study that goes a step ahead in providing cut-off values for each case at different time intervals in an attempt to obtain appropriate guidelines for undertaking such studies in the future.


   Conclusion Top


Only a few studies can be found in the literature dealing with the issue of the influence of storage on LF response.

The inevitable inherent change in LF due to various storage media commonly used, at different time intervals is put forth by the study. The values thus obtained can help remove the bias caused by the storage medium and the values of LF thus obtained can hence be conveniently extrapolated to the in vivo condition.

The study enables better use of DIAGNOdent as an evaluating measure in various in vitro studies.

 
   References Top

1.Pretty IA, Maupomé G. A closer look at diagnosis in clinical dental practice: Part 5. Emerging technologies for caries detection and diagnosis. J Can Dent Assoc 2004;70:540, 540a-540i.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Tranaeus S, Shi XQ, Angmar-Månsson B. Caries risk assessment: Methods available to clinicians for caries detection. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005;33:265-73.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Hibst R, Paulus R, Lussi A. Detection of occlusal caries by laser fluorescence: Basic and clinical investigations. Med Laser Appl 2001;16:205-13.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Hibst R, Paulus R. Caries detection by red excited fluorescence: Investigations on fluorophores. Caries Res 1999;33:295.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Alfano RR, Yao SS. Human teeth with and without dental caries studied by visible luminescent spectroscopy. J Dent Res 1981;60:120-2.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Mendes FM, Pinheiro SL, Bengtson AL. Effect of alteration in organic material of the occlusal caries on DIAGNOdent readings. Braz Oral Res 2004;18:141-4.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Farah RA, Drummond BK, Swain MV, Williams S. Relationship between laser fluorescence and enamel hypomineralisation. J Dent 2008;36:915-21.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.König K, Flemming G, Hibst R. Laser-induced autofluorescence spectroscopy of dental caries. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 1998; 44:1293-300.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Stookey GK, González-Cabezas C. Emerging methods of caries diagnosis. J Dent Educ 2001;65:1001-6.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Bader JD, Shugars DA. A systematic review of the performance of a laser fluorescence device for detecting caries. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:1413-26.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Lussi A, Imwinkelried S, Pitts N, Longbottom C, Reich E. Performance and reproducibility of a laser fluorescence system for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res 1999;33:261-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Anttonen V, Seppä L, Hausen H. Clinical study of the use of the laser fluorescence device DIAGNOdent for detection of occlusal caries in children. Caries Res 2003;37:17-23.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Angnes V, Angnes G, Batisttella M, Grande RH, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Clinical effectiveness of laser fluorescence, visual inspection and radiography in the detection of occlusal caries. Caries Res 2005;39:490-5.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Heinrich-Weltzien R, Weerheijm KL, Kühnisch J, Oehme T, Stösser L. Clinical evaluation of visual, radiographic, and laser fluorescence methods for detection of occlusal caries. ASDC J Dent Child 2002;69:127-32, 123.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Lussi A, Megert B, Longbottom C, Reich E, Francescut P. Clinical performance of a laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 2001;109:14-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Reis A, Mendes FM, Angnes V, Angnes G, Grande RH, Loguercio AD. Performance of methods of occlusal caries detection in permanent teeth under clinical and laboratory conditions. J Dent 2006;34:89-96.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Abalos C, Herrera M, Jiménez-Planas A, Llamas R. Performance of laser fluorescence for detection of occlusal dentinal caries lesions in permanent molars: An in vivo study with total validation of the sample. Caries Res 2009;43:137-41.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Lussi A, Hibst R, Paulus R. DIAGNOdent: An optical method for caries detection. J Dent Res 2004;83 Spec No C:C80-3.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Shi XQ, Tranaeus S, Angmar-Månsson B. Comparison of QLF and DIAGNOdent for quantification of smooth surface caries. Caries Res 2001;35:21-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Shi XQ, Tranaeus S, Angmar-Månsson B. Validation of DIAGNOdent for quantification of smooth-surface caries: An in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 2001;59:74-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Francescut P, Lussi A. Correlation between fissure discoloration, Diagnodent measurements, and caries depth: An in vitro study. Pediatr Dent 2003;25:559-64.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Lussi A, Francescut P. Performance of conventional and new methods for the detection of occlusal caries in deciduous teeth. Caries Res 2003;37:2-7.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Strawn SE, White JM, Marshall GW, Gee L, Goodis HE, Marshall SJ. Spectroscopic changes in human dentine exposed to various storage solutions - Short term. J Dent 1996;24:417-23.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Pantera EA Jr, Schuster GS. Sterilization of extracted human teeth. J Dent Educ 1990;54:283-5.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Nolte WA. Sterilization and disinfection. In: Nolte WA, editor. Oral Microbiology with Basic Microbiology and Immunology. 4 th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Co.; 1982. p. 55-87.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Zhang DQ, Bamzahim M, Yuan Y, Shi XQ. In vivo and in vitro validation of DIAGNOdent for detection and quantification of occlusal caries. In: Bamzahim MS, editor. Evaluation of the DIAGNOdent Method for Detection and Quantification of Carious Lesions - In Vitro and in Vivo Studies. Doctoral Thesis. Solna, Sweden: Karolinska Instituet; 2005.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Francescut P, Zimmerli B, Lussi A. Influence of different storage methods on laser fluorescence values: A two-year study. Caries Res 2006;40:181-5.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Bahrololoomi Z, Musavi SA, Kabudan M. In vitro evaluation of the efficacy of laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent) to detect demineralization and remineralization of smooth enamel lesions. J Conserv Dent 2013;16:362-6.  Back to cited text no. 28
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
29.Patil N, Choudhari S, Kulkarni S, Joshi SR. Comparative evaluation of remineralizing potential of three agents on artificially demineralized human enamel: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2013;16:116-20.  Back to cited text no. 29
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
30.Vashisht R, Indira R, Ramachandran S, Kumar A, Srinivasan MR. Role of casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate in remineralization of white spot lesions and inhibition of Streptococcus mutans? J Conserv Dent 2013;16:342-6.  Back to cited text no. 30
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  

Top
Correspondence Address:
Rudra Kaul
Department of Conservative and Endodontics, Institute of Dental Sciences, Jammu and Kashmir
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.128043

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1262    
    Printed33    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded126    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal