|Year : 2013 | Volume
| Issue : 6 | Page : 494-498
|Evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate as root canal sealer: A clinical study
Sophia Thakur1, Jonathan Emil2, Benin Paulaian2
1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bapuji Dental College and Hospital, Davangere, Karnataka, India
2 Rajas Dental College and Hospital, Kavalkinaru, Thirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India
Click here for correspondence address and email
|Date of Submission||04-Aug-2013|
|Date of Decision||25-Sep-2013|
|Date of Acceptance||03-Oct-2013|
|Date of Web Publication||2-Nov-2013|
| Abstract|| |
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcome of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) or epoxy resin as a root canal sealer compared with zinc oxide eugenol sealer.
Materials and Methods: 45 single rooted teeth with periapical index Score 2 or more were allotted to three groups with 15 teeth in each group. Root canal treatment was performed in two visits and obturated with Gutta-percha as obturating material and zinc oxide eugenol as sealer in Group 1, epoxy resin as sealer in Group 2 and MTA mixed with propylene glycol as sealer in Group 3. Visual analog scale, periapical index and VixWin digital Pro image analysis software were used for evaluation. The quantitative data was analyzed by t-test and analysis of variance. Ordinal data was analyzed by Wilcoxon's signed rank test, Mann-Whitney and Kruskall-Wallis test.
Results: Results suggested that there exists no statistically significant difference in clinical or radiological outcome of root canal therapy with three different types of sealers used in this study.
Conclusions: MTA could be used as a root canal sealer with equal effectiveness compared with epoxy resin and zinc oxide eugenol sealers. Further long-term studies should be carried out to prove the effectiveness.
Keywords: Mineral troxide aggregate; perapical index; periapical radiolucency; root canal sealer; root canal therapy; zinc oxide eugenol
|How to cite this article:|
Thakur S, Emil J, Paulaian B. Evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate as root canal sealer: A clinical study. J Conserv Dent 2013;16:494-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Thakur S, Emil J, Paulaian B. Evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate as root canal sealer: A clinical study. J Conserv Dent [serial online] 2013 [cited 2020 Jan 25];16:494-8. Available from: http://www.jcd.org.in/text.asp?2013/16/6/494/120944
| Introduction|| |
Root canal treatment is an effective, less invasive and ideal treatment modality for pulpally involved tooth and salvaging it from extraction. Cleaning, shaping and three dimensional obturation of root canal system are essential steps in root canal treatment.  The bacteria impervious seal that is essential for success is provided by the root canal sealer and obturation material.  Innumerable root canal sealers are time tested with definitive success rates. 
Lee et al. introduced mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), a tricalcium silicate cement as a perforation repair material.  Being biocompatible and bioactive it gained popularity for pulp capping, pulpotomy, apexification and as root end filling material. Recently, it is finding application as a root canal sealer  and as obturation material.  When used as a root canal sealer, MTA has the ability to regenerate periodontal ligament and form cementum in the root canal space and accessory canals, thus closing the leeway spaces that can result in the treatment failure.  More recently, sealers based on MTA have been introduced  and found to have good sealing ability and higher push-out bond strengths.  In addition, sealers based on MTA demonstrated apatite-like deposits in contact with physiological solutions and a biocompatibility similar to MTA.  A sealer of good working consistency could be developed by mixing MTA with adequate quantities of water-soluble polymer. 
Epoxy resin sealers like AH Plus was found to bond better to the core obturation material and root dentine.  They have the advantages such as less shrinkage, high radio opacity, low solubility, better periapical repair and biocompatibility.  Studies have evaluated the success of root canal treatment, the incidence of pain and healing ability and many other aspects of the root canal sealers both in vivo and in vitro. Evaluation of post-operative pain with visual analogue scale (VAS), periapical healing with periapical index (PAI) are widely used methods and morphometric evaluation with VixWin Pro digital image analysis software is a new, reliable and accurate technique. No in vivo human studies are available using MTA as a root canal sealer. Zinc oxide eugenol is an efficient and proven root canal sealer while epoxy resin has equivalent properties to compete with it. This study was done to compare the clinical and radiological outcome of MTA or epoxy resin as a root canal sealers compared to zinc oxide eugenol sealer using Gutta-percha as the obturating material in teeth with periapical radiolucency.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This study was conducted in patients in an age group of 18-50 years with teeth indicated for root canal treatment. Single rooted tooth with periapical radiolucency and PAI  Score 2 or more were included. Teeth with calcified canals, retreatment cases, pregnant patients, systemic diseases and lactating mothers were excluded.
The 45 teeth indicated for root canal treatment were allotted into three groups with 15 teeth in each group. Ethical permission was obtained from the university ethical committee. Informed consent was obtained from all patients after explaining the treatment procedure in detail. The cases were assigned into any one of the following groups:
Rubberdam was used for isolation of all cases. Caries was excavated and if necessary pre-endodontic management was done with composite resin. Access cavity was prepared with access preparation kit (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). After irrigation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) (Prime dental products, Thane, India), a K-File of appropriate size was introduced in the root canal and working length was verified with Propex II apex locator (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). This was confirmed by taking a radiograph using parallel cone technique with the help of a film positioning device (Endoray II, Densply Rinn. Elgin, US).
- Group 1: Zinc oxide eugenol (Tubliseal) as root canal sealer (n = 15)
- Group 2: Epoxy resin (AH Plus) as root canal sealer (n = 15)
- Group 3: MTA (ProRoot MTA) as root canal sealer (n = 15).
Cleaning and shaping was done with K-files (Sybron endo, orange, CA) and Protaper rotary system (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) for all the teeth. 2.5% NaOCl, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Anabond Stedman, Kanchipuram, India) and normal saline (Baxter, Alathur, India) were used as irrigants. After cleaning and shaping, the canals were dried and medicated with calcium hydroxide (Endo cal, M Dent, BKK, Thailand) mixed with normal saline. After 1 week, patients were recalled and the intracanal medicament was removed and evaluated. Once the patient was free of pain, discomfort and canals were dry, the teeth were obturated according to their groups.
For Group 1: Zinc oxide eugenol (Tubliseal, Kerr/Sybron, Romulus, MI) was used as root canal sealer. The apical extent of the master cone was confirmed with radiograph and the canals were dried. Manufacturer's instructions were followed for mixing the sealer. The root canal was coated with the sealer using lentulospirals (Densply Canada, Woodbridge, Canada) in a slow speed handpiece (NSK, Tochigi, Japan). Obturation was performed with Gutta-percha cones and sealer by lateral compaction technique.
For Group 2: Epoxy resin (AH Plus, Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) was used as a sealer. Manufacturer's instructions were followed for mixing the sealer. The same steps were followed for obturation as in Group 1.
MTA (ProRoot MTA, Densply Tulsa, Johnson City) was used as root canal sealer in Group 3. To improve the handling properties of MTA and to get a sealer like consistency, the powder was mixed with propylene glycol , in a mixing pad. MTA sealer was coated in canal walls using lentulo spirals in a slow speed handpiece and obturated as in Groups 1 and 2. All treated teeth if required, were reduced to relieve occlusal load. Permanent restorations were done with composite resin (Filtek Z 350, 3M ESPE) and full coverage restoration if necessary after obturation. Follow-up evaluations were done after an interval of 1 week and after 6 months.
Pain evaluation - VAS
Before commencing the evaluation for pain, every patient was explained about the usage of VAS  using the following criteria:
Immediately after obturation and placement of coronal seal every patient was asked to mark the pain intensity using a 10 cm VAS. All subjects were recalled after 1 week of post-obturation for evaluation of pain and clinically examined. After 6 months, pain was evaluated using the same criteria.
Periapical status - PAI
Immediate post-obturation radiograph (base line data) was evaluated for PAI score and recorded in the evaluation sheet using the criteria described by Orstavik. , At the 6 month follow-up visit, again a radiograph was taken using parallel cone technique and the PAI score was assessed [Figure 1].
|Figure 1: Sample radiographs: (a) Pre-operative, (b) immediate post-operative and (c) after 6 months for the groups respectively|
Click here to view
Area measurement - VixWin Pro digital image analysis software
Immediately after obturation, a digital radiograph was taken (base line data) with Gendex RVG unit for morphometric analysis (Gendex Dental Systems, Hatfiled, PA, USA). The image was then subjected to morphometric area measurement with the area measurement tool in the VixWin Pro digital image analysis software (Version 1.3, Gendex Dental Systems, Hatfiled, PA, USA) by outlining the radiolucency.  Calibration was done automatically by the software. The area measured was recorded in the evaluation sheet. At the 6 month, again the same procedure was repeated and the area was measured using the same criteria as mentioned before [Figure 2].
|Figure 2: Area measurement by outlining the radiolucency using VixWin Pro digital image analysis software|
Click here to view
Wilcoxon's signed rank test was used for comparison of pain and PAI score within the groups at different intervals. Kruskall-Wallis analysis of variance test followed by Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of pain and PAI scores between groups at different intervals. Wilcoxon's signed rank test was used for the comparison of area among the three groups at base line and at 6 months.
| Results|| |
VAS score (evaluation for pain)
Pain comparison was performed intergroup and intragroup at three specific time periods. The standard deviation (SD) of VAS score immediately after obturation for the groups are 8.46 (11.26), 10.46 (14.86) and 7.63 (8.46) respectively. Group 2 was found to have more VAS score (P = 0.19) than other two groups but was statistically not significant (P = 0.19). When the pain was compared within the group at 1 week and at 6 months, there was no difference. VAS score after 6 months were 1.63, 1.06 and 0.33 respectively and there was no statistically significant difference [Table 1] and [Table 2].
|Table 1: Comparison of pain between groups measured by VAS at baseline, 1 week and at 6 months|
Click here to view
|Table 2: Comparison of pain within group measured by VAS at baseline, 1 week and at 6 months|
Click here to view
PAI score (periapical status)
There was a highly significant (HS) difference in the PAI score was found on comparing the base line and at 6 months. However, no difference among the groups was found at any interval [Table 3].
|Table 3: Comparison of periapical index score within groups at baseline and at 6 months|
Click here to view
Area measurement (regression of periapical radiolucency)
The SD of area measured immediately after obturation for the groups were 8.14 (8.40), 9.57 (9.20) and 4.32 (5.20) respectively and area after 6 months were 5.4 (5.7), 6.80 (8.11) and 4.14 (3.93) respectively. There was a HS difference in the area measurement comparing the base line and at 6 months, but no difference among the groups at any interval [Table 4].
| Discussion|| |
Invasion of microorganisms into the pulp is responsible for the pathogenesis and necrosis of the vital tissue.  Elimination of infection from the root canal system followed by its maintenance was found to induce healing. Root canal sealers along with obturation material will provide a bacteria proof seal of the root canal system, preventing the leeway space and communications between the intracanal and extracanal environments. 
The present study was designed to compare the clinical and radiological outcome of three different root canal sealers. No difference in the age, sex, tooth type, tooth distribution, root morphology, PAI score and area measurement at baseline suggest that the groups were equally distributed [Table 5].
Zinc oxide eugenol was used as a positive control in this study. This is because it has a history of long-term clinical usage with definitive success rate. It has good handling properties, sealing ability,  minimal tissue toxicity,  less water solubility, antimicrobial property  periapical repair and good radio opacity. AH Plus is an epoxy resin based sealer that is widely used because of its compatibility with resin based materials used for obturation and post-endodontic restorations. Because of better flow and long setting time, AH Plus sealer can penetrates deeper into the surface micro irregularities  as well inside the lateral root canals. These properties lead to greater intertwining of the sealer with dentin structure, which, together with the cohesion among the cement molecules provides greater adhesiveness and resistance to dislodgment.  MTA mixed with propylene glycol was used as a root canal sealer in this study. MTA sets hard and its setting time is long enough (165 ± 5 min)  to be used as a sealer. Calcium sulfate sealers based on MTA has demonstrated apatite-like deposits in contact with physiological solutions and a biocompatibility similar to MTA. 
Pain was evaluated at 3 time periods-immediately after obturation, 1 week after obturation and 6 months after obturation. On comparison of pain between groups, there was no statistically significant difference in pain experienced by the subjects in any of the time intervals evaluated. Clinical difference in pain intensity was observed by patients with epoxy resin sealer experiencing more pain, but was not statistically significant. The results of this study are in accordance with results obtained by Alacam in his study.  He found no statistical significant difference between the presence and type of post-operative discomfort and the type of sealer utilized.  Comparison with in the group at different interval has provided a HS difference immediately after the procedure and after 1 week or after 6 months. According to a meta-analysis by Nixdorf et al., the incidence of persistent tooth pain after endodontic therapy is 5.3%.  The results of this study are in accordance with these results.
The radiological outcome of root canal treatment using three different sealers was evaluated with PAI. When compared with in the group, there is a highly statistically significant difference in the PAI score at baseline and after 6 months. This dictates that healing of the periapical lesions may take longer time period than 6 months. But, according to a study by Jean Camps, there was a noticeable change in the periapical lesion after comparing the radiographs taken immediately after treatment, after 3 months and 6 months of endodontic therapy.  However, there was no increase in PAI score in any of the groups. This implies that all the three sealers used were highly efficient in inducing healing of the periapical tissues.
Morphometric area measurement was done using VixWin Pro digital image analyzing software (Gendex dental systems).  The periapical lesions were circumscribed by drawing the outline and the software provided the measured area in cm 2 . There was no difference in the baseline data. When compared at different time periods within the same group, there was a statistically significant difference in the area measured. There was a decrease in the area measured in all the groups after a period of 6 months.
There are no previous clinical studies evaluating area measurement using VixWin Pro digital image analysis software  as criteria for success of endodontic therapy. So, comparison of results with previous studies in the literature is not possible, but ideally it can be judged that, PAI records the periapical status of a tooth based on previous reference radiographs, which is more subjective and differs between the examiners. Area measurement makes it more objective, better comparison between pre-operative and follow-up evaluation with less inter examiner bias. In this study, MTA was mixed with propylene glycol to get a sealer consistency. , However in the future studies, an ideal powder liquid ratio with the vehicle should be established. Though radiographically detectable difference in periapical lesions can be appreciated in 6 months as used in this study, further longer period evaluation should be carried out in the future. Furthermore, the removal of material from the root canal system, if retreatment is indicated should also be evaluated. Being a biocompatible material and having the property to induce the deposition of cementum and periapical repair, MTA can prove to be a better material than other sealers. The scope of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of MTA as a root canal sealer considering its radiological and clinical success rate, usage and feasibility. MTA was found to be as good as epoxy resin and zinc oxide eugenol. Further long-term clinical trials with more criteria should be conducted to conclude the superiority of MTA among other root canal sealers.
| Conclusions|| |
Among the three root canal sealers used in this study, no sealer was proven to be superior. MTA has performed equally well when compared with the zinc oxide eugenol and AH Plus. Further long-term clinical trials with more criteria should be conducted to conclude the superiority among these materials.
| References|| |
|1.||Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974;18:269-96. |
|2.||Peters OA, Peters CI. Cleaning and shaping of the root canal system. In: Cohen S, Hargreaves KM, editors. Pathways of the Pulp. 9 th ed. Missouri: Mosby; 2006. p. 290-357. |
|3.||Branstetter J, von Fraunhofer JA. The physical properties and sealing action of endodontic sealer cements: A review of the literature. J Endod 1982;8:312-6. |
|4.||Lee SJ, Monsef M, Torabinejad M. Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of lateral root perforations. J Endod 1993;19:541-4. |
|5.||Gomes-Filho JE, Watanabe S, Bernabé PF, de Moraes Costa MT. A mineral trioxide aggregate sealer stimulated mineralization. J Endod 2009;35:256-60. |
|6.||Bogen G, Kuttler S. Mineral trioxide aggregate obturation: A review and case series. J Endod 2009;35:777-90. |
|7.||Holland R, de Souza V, Nery MJ, Otoboni Filho JA, Bernabé PF, Dezan Júnior E. Reaction of dogs' teeth to root canal filling with mineral trioxide aggregate or a glass ionomer sealer. J Endod 1999;25:728-30. |
|8.||Huffman BP, Mai S, Pinna L, Weller RN, Primus CM, Gutmann JL, et al. Dislocation resistance of ProRoot Endo Sealer, a calcium silicate-based root canal sealer, from radicular dentine. Int Endod J 2009;42:34-46. |
|9.||Ber BS, Hatton JF, Stewart GP. Chemical modification of proroot mta to improve handling characteristics and decrease setting time. J Endod 2007;33:1231-4. |
|10.||Lee KW, Williams MC, Camps JJ, Pashley DH. Adhesion of endodontic sealers to dentin and gutta-percha. J Endod 2002;28:684-8. |
|11.||Leonardo MR, Salgado AA, da Silva LA, Tanomaru Filho M. Apical and periapical repair of dogs' teeth with periapical lesions after endodontic treatment with different root canal sealers. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2003;17:69-74. |
|12.||Orstavik D, Kerekes K, Eriksen HM. The periapical index: A scoring system for radiographic assessment of apical periodontitis. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986;2:20-34. |
|13.||Holland R, Mazuqueli L, de Souza V, Murata SS, Dezan Júnior E, Suzuki P. Influence of the type of vehicle and limit of obturation on apical and periapical tissue response in dogs' teeth after root canal filling with mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2007;33:693-7. |
|14.||Orstavik D. Reliability of the periapical index scoring system. Scand J Dent Res 1988;96:108-11. |
|15.||Carvalho FB, Gonçalves M, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru-Filho M. Evaluation of periapical changes following endodontic therapy: Digital subtraction technique compared with computerized morphometric analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:438-44. |
|16.||Nair PN. On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: A review. Int Endod J 2006;39:249-81. |
|17.||De Almeida WA, Leonardo MR, Tanomaru Filho M, Silva LA. Evaluation of apical sealing of three endodontic sealers. Int Endod J 2000;33:25-7. |
|18.||Camps J, Pommel L, Bukiet F, About I. Influence of the powder/liquid ratio on the properties of zinc oxide-eugenol-based root canal sealers. Dent Mater 2004;20:915-23. |
|19.||Mickel AK, Wright ER. Growth inhibition of Streptococcus anginosus (milleri) by three calcium hydroxide sealers and one zinc oxide-eugenol sealer. J Endod 1999;25:34-7. |
|20.||Balguerie E, van der Sluis L, Vallaeys K, Gurgel-Georgelin M, Diemer F. Sealer penetration and adaptation in the dentinal tubules: A scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod 2011;37:1576-9. |
|21.||Nunes VH, Silva RG, Alfredo E, Sousa-Neto MD, Silva-Sousa YT. Adhesion of epiphany and AH Plus sealers to human root dentin treated with different solutions. Braz Dent J 2008;19:46-50. |
|22.||Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR. Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. J Endod 1995;21:349-53. |
|23.||Alacam T. Incidence of postoperative pain following the use of different sealers in immediate root canal filling. J Endod 1985;11:135-7. |
|24.||Nixdorf DR, Moana-Filho EJ, Law AS, McGuire LA, Hodges JS, John MT. Frequency of persistent tooth pain after root canal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2010;36:224-30. |
|25.||Camps J, Pommel L, Bukiet F. Evaluation of periapical lesion healing by correction of gray values. J Endod 2004;30:762-6. |
|26.||De Rossi A, De Rossi M, Rocha LB, da Silva LA, Rossi MA. Morphometric analysis of experimentally induced periapical lesions: Radiographic vs histopathological findings. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:211-7. |
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Rajas Dental College, Kavalkinaru, Thirunelveli, Tamil Nadu
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]
| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||2356 |
| Printed||59 |
| Emailed||0 |
| PDF Downloaded||319 |
| Comments ||[Add] |