Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Home About us Editorial Board Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online: 422
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 


 
Table of Contents   
CASE REPORT  
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 471-473
Management of mandibular first molar with four canals in mesial root


Department of Conservative and Endodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission03-Mar-2013
Date of Decision14-May-2013
Date of Acceptance11-Jul-2013
Date of Web Publication3-Sep-2013
 

   Abstract 

Successful root canal treatment depends on adequate cleaning, shaping, and filling of the root canal system. The presence of middle mesial (MM) root canal of mandibular molars has been reported by various authors. But incidence of four canals in mesial root of mandibular molar is very rare. The aim of this case report is to present and describe the identification and management of a mandibular first molar with four canals in the mesial root and single canal in the distal root.

Keywords: Four canals in mesial root; mandibular molar; two middle mesial canals

How to cite this article:
Subbiya A, Kumar KS, Vivekanandhan P, Prakash V. Management of mandibular first molar with four canals in mesial root. J Conserv Dent 2013;16:471-3

How to cite this URL:
Subbiya A, Kumar KS, Vivekanandhan P, Prakash V. Management of mandibular first molar with four canals in mesial root. J Conserv Dent [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 Sep 20];16:471-3. Available from: http://www.jcd.org.in/text.asp?2013/16/5/471/117495

   Introduction Top


Post treatment apical periodontitis or endodontic failure is associated with persistence of microbial infection in the root canal system and/or the periradicular area. [1] Microorganisms present in untouched areas such as missed canals, isthmuses, and irregularities may remain unaffected by endodontic disinfection procedures. These microorganisms continue to multiply to significant number and gain access to the periradicular region, causing inflammation in the periradicular tissues. [2] Therefore, the successful root canal treatment depends on adequate cleaning, shaping, and filling of the root canal system. There have been numerous studies that describe the complex morphology of teeth, including mandibular first molars. In 1974, Vertucci and Williams, as well as Barker et al., described the presence of an independent middle mesial (MM) canal. [3],[4] The presence of MM root canal of mandibular molars has been reported to have an incidence rate of 1-15% in various in vitro studies and case reports. The incidence of four canals in mesial root of mandibular molar have been reported by two authors ininvitro studies [5],[6] and by three authors as case reports. [7],[8],[9] The aim of this case report is to present and describe the management of a mandibular first molar with four canals in the mesial root and single canal in the distal root.


   Case Report Top


A 37-year-old male patient with a noncontributory medical history reported to our department with discomfort and pain in the right mandibular region. History of present illness showed that there were few episodes of recurrent pain in that region for the past 1 year. There was a large carious lesion and a draining sinus in relation to left mandibular first molar with pain on palpation in the periapical region. Pulp testing with cold and electric pulse tester (EPT) was nonresponsive. Intraoral periapical (IOPA) radiograph revealed a large radiolucency around the periapex of left mandibular first molar [Figure 1]a. Gutta-percha tracing of sinus showed that the sinus originated from the periapical radiolucency around the tooth. It was diagnosed as pulpal necrosis with symptomatic apical periodontitis. Treatment plan was explained to the patient and endodontic treatment was initiated under rubber dam isolation. Three canals were located, two in the mesial and one in the distal. Under magnification, it was evident that the mesiobuccal (MB) and mesiolingual (ML) were placed well apart with an isthmus joining the two canals. With the above mentioned pulpal floor anatomy over the mesial root, a possibility of MMcanalwas anticipated in the isthmus between MB and ML. On exploration with DG-16, there was a "catch" or a "stick" feeling where a MM canal was located close to MB canal. The distance between the MM canal and ML canal with a prominent isthmus between the two, prompted us to look for a second MM canal. Further exploration on the isthmus revealed one more "stick" feeling which on penetration with profinder revealed to be a second MM located closer to the ML canal [Figure 1]b. IOPA radiograph revealed one MM joining the MB canal and another joining the ML canal in the middle third [Figure 1]c. The orifices were enlarged using #2 GatesGlidden Drill (Mani, Japan) to enhance access and visualization. After confirming the working length with an apex locator (Root ZX, J Morita, Tokyo, Japan), the mesial canals were enlarged up to size 25-6% (M two, DentsplyMaillefer) and the distal canal was instrumented with hand K-files (DentsplyMaillefer) by crown down method with apex enlarged to size40. Intracanal medicament of 2% chlorhexidine was placed and closed dressing was given. Since the anatomy was unusual, a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image was taken to confirm the anatomy [Figure 1]d. CBCT image confirmed the presence of two MM canals of which one joined the MB and another joined the ML canal at the middle third and exited as a single canal at the apex. This was followed by an intracanal medication with CaOH (Dentocal, Anabond Stedman) with chlorhexidine (Asep-RC, Anabond Stedman) after a week for 3 weeks. CaOH was not placed in the first sitting as the radiopaque CaOH may obscure the CBCT image. Obturation was performed at the third appointment using cold lateral compaction of gutta-percha and AH-26 (Dentsply Maillefer) as a root canal sealer. [Figure 2]a and b shows the IOPA images immediately after obturation in buccal and distal view. [Figure 2]c is 6 month follow-up image showing a good healing of the periapical lesion.
Figure 1: (a) Preoperative IOPA radiograph of tooth #36. (b) Intraoral image showing four canals in the mesial root. (c) IOPA radiograph showing four canals in the mesial root. (d) Cone beam computerised tomography image showing the presence offour canals in the mesial root

Click here to view
Figure 2: (a) IOPA radiograph after obturation, buccal view. (b) IOPA radiograph after obturation, distal view. (c) IOPA radiograph after 6 months

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The incidence of MM canal ranges from 1 to 15%. [10] Pomeranz et al., [11] in a report of 100 cases found that 12 molars had MM canals and classified them into three morphologic categories as follows: Fin, confluent, and independent. Fin, where there is free communication between all three canals and confluent, where MM canal joins one of the main canals. According to Fabra-Campos, this MM canal more commonly joins the MB canal. [12] In a systematic review by de Pablo et al., the MM canal was present in 2.6% mandibular first molars. They reported that intracanal communications existed in about 55% of mesial roots of the first molar. [13]

The pulpal floor of first molar may or may not show a clear isthmus between the two canals. The isthmus is generally obscured by a dentinal projection which can be removed with specialized ultrasonic tip or one-fourth round bur. If the isthmus isevident clinically, presence of a MM canal should always be anticipated. Hsu and Kim [14] classified isthmus configurations, where type V (single, broad, and elongated canal) was the most frequent among mesial roots of mandibular molars. According to a study by Yesilsoy et al., [15] the groove between the MB and ML can be as deep as 3.5 mm from the orifice and between 4 and 6 mm from the apical foramen. [16] This groove is a potential area to be addressed and there is a need to modify the access to disinfect the root canal system effectively. Careful probing of this area will show a "catch" or a "stick" feeling if there is a canal in the isthmus. This isthmus could also be broad, with a fin type of MM canal. A fin type MM canal may be seen in younger age patients as canal differentiation in isthmus region with complete division of the root canal system starts only after 16 years of age and is seen in all roots only after the age of 30 years. And if numerous partitions form, extensive differentiation of the root canal system results in a reticular form in which three or more vertical canals are present with lateral interconnections. [17] Thus, a possibility of additional canals should be expected in patients above the age of 30 years. Most of the reported cases of third mesial canal have been in patients of 40 years of age or more. Though the presence of a third mesial canal has been reported by many authors, presence of fourth mesial canal has been reported only thrice. [7],[8],[9] Goel et al., in an in vitro study on Indian population reported an incidence of 3.3% of four canals in the mesial root of mandibular first molar. [18] Another in vitro study by Wasti et al., in Pakistan, which is of a similar ethnic population as this patient (Indian), one out of 30 teeth showed a Vertucci typeVIII configuration. [19]

In a study on 2,800 teeth by Sert and Bayirli, [5] 36 teeth showed morphology which does not come under Vertucci's classification and it occurred twice as often inmandibular teeth. They described four canals in mesial root exiting as one canal, but does not mention a 4-2-1pattern as seen in this case. Gulabivala et al., described a four canal pattern, but exiting as two canals, in Burmese population [6] as type XI. Thus, an absence of report of such a pattern and with only three previous case reports of four canals in the mesial root makes this report unique and worth mentioning to understand the complexity of root canal system of mandibular first molar.

Despite report of such extra canals, Mortman and Ahn [20] describes these extra mesial canals are a sequelae of instrumenting the isthmus between the MB and ML canals. But according to Navarro et al., if preparing a 'canal' in an isthmus can assist in cleaning and reshaping it, as many canals as necessary (without damaging the root structure) may be prepared so as to divide the isthmus and make it easier for the disinfectants to penetrate the spaces that cannot be reached with a file. [21] Care should be taken while instrumenting such confluent canals with nickel-titanium rotary instruments, as they have a tendency to break where two canals join at a sharp angle into one small canal. [6]


   Conclusion Top


Failure to locate and clean extra canals decreases the long-term prognosis of endodontic treatment. Endodontic management of aberrant root canal is often challenging. Adequate knowledge of aberrancies, the will to search for them, combined with usage of magnification, and modern imaging techniques will beget us greater success. This case report describes a successful management of an aberrant morphology in a mandibular molar with four canals in the mesial root and one canal in the distal root.

 
   References Top

1.Nair PN, Sjögren U, Krey G, Kahnberg KE, Sundqvist G. Intraradicular bacteria and fungi in root-filled, asymptomatic human teeth with therapy-resistant periapical lesions: A long-term light and electron microscopic follow-up study. J Endod 1990;16:580-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Siqueira JF Jr. Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: Why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 2001;34:1-10.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Vertucci FJ, Williams RG. Root canal anatomy of the mandibular first molar. J N J Dent Assoc 1974;45:27-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Barker BC, Parsons KC, Mills PR, Williams GL. Anatomy of root canals. III. Permanent mandibular molars. Aust Dent J 1974;19:408-13.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Sert S, Bayirli GS. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod 2004;30:391-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Gulabivala K, Aung TH, Alavi A, Ng YL. Root and canal morphology of Burmese mandibular molars. Int Endod J 2001;34:359-70.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Reeh ES. Seven canals in a lower first molar. J Endod 1998;24:497-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Kontakiotis EG, Tzanetakis GN. Four canals in the mesial root of a mandibular first molar. A case report under the operating microscope. Aust Endod J 2007;33:84-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Aminsobhani M, Shokouhinejad N, Ghabraei S, Bolhari B, Ghorbanzadeh A. Retreatment of a 6-canalled mandibular first molar with four mesial canals: A case report. Iran Endod J 2010;5:138-40.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Topics 2005;10:3-29.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Pomeranz HH, Eidelman DL, Goldberg MG. Treatment considerations of the middle mesial canal of mandibular first and second molars. J Endod 1981;7:565-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.Fabra-Campos H. Unusual root anatomy of mandibular first molars. J Endod 1985;11:568-72.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.de Pablo OV, Estevez R, Péix Sánchez M, Heilborn C, Cohenca N. Root anatomy and canal configuration of the permanent mandibular first molar: A systematic review. J Endod 2010;36:1919-31.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Hsu YY, Kim S. The resected root surface: The issue of canal isthmuses. Dent Clin North Am 1997;41:529-40.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.Yesilsoy C, Gordon W, Porras O, Hoch B. Observation of depth and incidence of the mesial groove between the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual orifices in mandibular molars. J Endod 2002;28:507-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.Teixeira FB, Sano CL, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, Souza-Filho FJ. A preliminary in vitro study of the incidence and position of the root canal isthmus in maxillary and mandibular first molars. Int Endod J 2003;36:276-80.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.Peiris HR, Pitakotuwage TN, Takahashi M, Sasaki K, Kanazawa E. Root canal morphology of mandibular permanent molars at different ages. Int Endod J 2008;41:828-35.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.Goel N, Gill K, Taneja J. Study of root canals configuration in mandibular first permanent molar. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 1991; 8:12-4.   Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    
19.Wasti F, Shearer AC, Wilson NH. Root canal systems of the mandibular and maxillary first permanent molar teeth of south Asian Pakistanis. Int Endod J 2001;34:263-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]    
20.Mortman RE, Ahn S. Mandibular first molars with three mesial canals. Gen Dent 2003;51:549-51.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.Navarro LF, Luzi A, García AA, García AH. Third canal in the mesial root of permanent mandibular first molars: Review of the literature and presentation of 3 clinical reports and 2 in vitro studies. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007;12:E605-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Arunajatesan Subbiya
35, 3rd avenue, Indra Nagar, Adyar, Chennai - 600 020, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.117495

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
 
 
  Search
 
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2251    
    Printed39    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded257    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal