Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Home About us Editorial Board Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online: 179
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

Table of Contents   
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 303-304
Authors' reply

1 Laboratory for Phototherapeutics in Oral Diseases, Discipline of Endodontics, University of Toronto, 124 Edward Street, Toronto ON M5G 1G6, Canada
2 Department of Preventive Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119704, Singapore
3 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Oxford Dental College, Bangalore, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission12-Mar-2012
Date of Decision16-Jun-2012
Date of Acceptance18-Jun-2012
Date of Web Publication3-Jul-2012

How to cite this article:
Shrestha A, Mohamed- Tahir M A, Hegde J, Azarpazhooh A, Kishen A. Authors' reply. J Conserv Dent 2012;15:303-4

How to cite this URL:
Shrestha A, Mohamed- Tahir M A, Hegde J, Azarpazhooh A, Kishen A. Authors' reply. J Conserv Dent [serial online] 2012 [cited 2020 Aug 14];15:303-4. Available from:
Dear Editor,

This letter is written in response to the letter to the editor dated 16 th February 2012. [1]

In our study an optical spectroscopy based method was used to measure/monitor the bacterial-mediated acidogenic-profile of saliva. Additional correlations with a standard pH meter and past caries experience of the patients were made. The experiments showed a strong correlation between the pH reading measured using a pH meter and the absorbance reading measured (from a photosensitive pH indicator) using the optical spectroscopic sensor. It is important to note that the optical spectroscopic system was calibrated, before any test is carried out using standard pH solutions (at pH 4 and 7). Previous publications have described similar optical spectroscopy based principles to monitor clinically relevant variables for quick diagnostic applications (References: 13-18 in the manuscript). The sensitivity, specificity and the predictive values have been clearly discussed in the manuscript (Page 399). Author AA is an experienced clinical epidemiologist. In addition, the sample size was chosen based on the power calculation carried out at statistics unit, at the National University of Singapore. [2]

The basic mechanism of optical sensor is based on the absorbance of a sample. Using the Beer Lambert's law, the variation in the absorbance could be related to the concentration of any specific parameter in a sample. Different biomedical equipments such as UV-visible spectrophotometers and ELISA plate readers work on the same basic principle of absorbance. Although optical spectroscopy could be a relatively newer technology compared to a pH meter for a practicing dentist, these are established systems/approaches in biotechnology. By applying this approach to determine pH changes, we are looking at a photometric resolution in the range of 0.001 absorbance unit and a photometric accuracy in the range of +/-1% +/- 0.0010 Abs from 0 to 2.000 Abs

Cost effectiveness is a relative feature. The caries detection systems such as Diagnodent ( could cost around $4000-5000 per unit. Another caries detection kit, Dentocult SM costs approximately $10 for one patient. The OSS can be assembled using a LED (light source), optical fiber and a detector, which might not be an expensive option at all, especially when compared to many of the current caries detection systems. Further, with rapid advances in instrumentation, these schemes can be easily developed to be a cost-effective, miniature system.

Thus we believe that an optical spectroscopy based approach will provide information with high resolution and sensitivity, and can be used to monitor clinically important variables such as salivary pH. We did not imply that this single measurement can be used for caries risk assessment. Dental caries is a multifactorial disease, and we believe that rapid cost effective sensors that can measure different (multiple) risk factors from saliva may be a potential system for caries risk assessment. In that line, optical spectroscopic sensor is a worthwhile strategy.

Thank you for this opportunity to explain further on this article.

   References Top

1.Wiwanitkit V. Caries-risk assessment with a chairside optical spectroscopic sensor. J Conserv Dent 2012;15:in press.  Back to cited text no. 1
2.Shrestha A, Mohamed- Tahir MA, Hegde J, Azarpazhooh A, Kishen A. Caries-risk assessment with a chairside optical spectroscopic sensor by monitoring bacterial-mediated acidogenic-profile of saliva in children. J Conserv Dent 2011;14:395-400  Back to cited text no. 2

Correspondence Address:
Anil Kishen
Laboratory for Phototherapeutics in Oral Diseases, Discipline of Endodontics, University of Toronto, 124 Edward Street, Toronto ON M5G 1G6
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded72    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal