Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Home About us Editorial Board Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online: 537
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 14  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 409-413

Clinical evaluation of giomer- and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in class V noncarious cervical lesions: An in vivo study


Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Siddhartha Dental College, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
K N Jyothi
101, 2nd Cross, 4th Main, Income Tax Layout, Near Attiguppe, Vijaynagar, Bangalore - 560 040
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.87214

Rights and Permissions

Objectives : To evaluate and compare the clinical performance of Giomer (Beautifil II) and RMGIC (Fuji II LC) in noncarious cervical lesions. Materials and Methods : Thirty-two subjects with one or two pairs of noncarious cervical lesions were included in the study. Each pair of lesion was restored with either giomer or RMGIC assigned randomly. Clinical evaluation of restorations was done using USPHS criteria. Data was formulated in a predesigned format and subjected to statistical analysis using the chi square test. Results : Statistically significant difference was found between RMGIC and Giomer with respect to surface roughness with P value <0.001. Conclusion : Giomer showed superior surface finish compared to RMGIC. Both Giomer and RMGIC showed equal retention ability.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4268    
    Printed136    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded434    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal